Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?

Science education reform documents emphasize the importance of inquiry experiences for young learners. This means that teachers must be prepared with the knowledge, skills, and habits of thinking to mentor their students through authentic investigations. This study examines how preservice teachers' inquiry experiences, in a science methods course, influenced and were influenced by their conceptions of inquiry. The study also assesses how these experiences were associated with eventual classroom practice. Six preservice secondary teachers were observed during a 2-month inquiry project and then followed into the classroom as they began a 9-week teaching practicum. Data revealed that participants' preproject conceptions of the inquiry process were related to the conduct and interpretation of their own inquiry project, and that the project experience modified the inquiry conceptions of those participants who already had sophisticated understandings of scientific investigations. Perhaps most importantly, the participants who eventually used guided and open inquiry during their student teaching were not those who had more authentic views of inquiry or reflected most deeply about their own inquiry projects, but rather they were individuals who had significant undergraduate or professional experiences with authentic science research. Finally, this article advocates that independent science investigations be part of preservice education and that these experiences should be scaffolded to prompt reflection specifically about the nature of inquiry and conceptually linked to ways in which inquiry can be brought into the K-12 classroom. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed87:112–143, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.10044

[1]  Carla Zembal-Saul,et al.  Engaging in Science as Inquiry: Prospective Elementary Teachers' Learning in the Context of an Innovative Life Science Course. , 2001 .

[2]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science , 1999 .

[3]  Sandra H. Fradd,et al.  Teachers' Roles in Promoting Science Inquiry with Students from Diverse Language Backgrounds. , 1999 .

[4]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Preparing Students for Competent Scientific Practice: Implications of Recent Research in Science and Technology Studies , 1999 .

[5]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN LEARNING TO TEACH ELEMENTARY SCIENCE , 1999 .

[6]  Christine Y. O'Sullivan,et al.  Student Work and Teacher Practices in Science. , 1999 .

[7]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[8]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick,et al.  An Exploratory Study of the Knowledge Base for Science Teaching , 1997 .

[9]  Brian Alters,et al.  Whose nature of science , 1997 .

[10]  B. Shapiro A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the “face of science that does not yet know” , 1996 .

[11]  Paul J. Germann,et al.  Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry , 1996 .

[12]  Navigating a sea of ideas: Teacher and students negotiate a course toward mutual relevance , 1995 .

[13]  Gordon Wells,et al.  Language and the Inquiry-Oriented Curriculum , 1995 .

[14]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Lessons Learned: How Collaboration Helped Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[15]  Contrasts and Similarities in Case Studies of Teacher Reflection and Change , 1994 .

[16]  Deborah Pomeroy Implications of Teachers' Beliefs about the Nature of Science: Comparison of the Beliefs of Scientists, Secondary Science Teachers, and Elementary Teachers. , 1993 .

[17]  Deborah Trumbull,et al.  University researchers' inchoate critiques-of science teaching: Implications for the content of preservice science teacher education , 1993 .

[18]  M. Pajares,et al.  Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct , 1992 .

[19]  Norman G. Lederman Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[20]  Linda R. Valli,et al.  Reflective teacher education : cases and critiques , 1992 .

[21]  Kathy Carter,et al.  Meaning and metaphor: Case knowledge in teaching , 1990 .

[22]  H. Marshall Metaphor as an instructional tool in encouraging student teacher reflection , 1990 .

[23]  Kenneth M. Zeichner Changing Directions in the Practicum: looking ahead to the 1990s , 1990 .

[24]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum , 1988 .

[25]  Reflective Teacher Education and Moral Deliberation , 1987 .

[26]  J. Nespor The Role of Beliefs in the Practice of Teaching. , 1987 .

[27]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[28]  D. Clandinin,et al.  Rhythms in teaching: The narrative study of teachers' personal practical knowledge of classrooms , 1986 .

[29]  A. Tom Inquiring into Inquiry-oriented Teacher Education , 1985 .

[30]  Sharon Feiman-Nemser,et al.  Pitfalls of Experience in Teacher Preparation , 1985, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[31]  D. Cruickshank Uses and Benefits of Reflective Teaching. , 1985 .

[32]  Pinchas Tamir Inquiry and the Science Teacher. , 1983 .

[33]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[34]  Kenneth M. Zeichner,et al.  Are the Effects of University Teacher Education 'Washed Out' by School Experience? , 1981 .

[35]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations , 1981 .

[36]  Dennis W. Sunal,et al.  Assessing Inquiry Potential: A Tool For Curriculum Decision Makers , 1980 .

[37]  M. Herron,et al.  The Nature of Scientific Enquiry , 1971, The School Review.