Boundary objects in information science

Boundary objects (BOs) are abstract or physical artifacts that exist in the liminal spaces between adjacent communities of people. The theory of BOs was originally introduced by Star and Griesemer in a study on information practices at the Berkeley Museum of Vertebrate Zoology but has since been adapted in a broad range of research contexts in a large number of disciplines including the various branches of information science. The aim of this review article is to present an overview of the state‐of‐the‐art of information science research informed by the theory of BOs, critically discuss the notion, and propose a structured overview of how the notion has been applied in the study of information.

[1]  S. L. Star,et al.  Social science, technical systems, and cooperative work: beyond the great divide , 1999 .

[2]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Boundary Objects with Agency: A Method for Studying the Design–Use Interface , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[3]  Natalya Godbold,et al.  Chapter 3 Usefully Messy: How People Use Rich, Complex Descriptions to Make Sense in Online Renal Discussion Groups , 2012 .

[4]  D. Grant Campbell,et al.  Global Abstractions: The Classification of International Economic Data for Bibliographic and Statistical Purposes , 2003 .

[5]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  Document theory for the design of socio-technical systems: A document model as ontology of human expression , 2012, J. Documentation.

[6]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[7]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[8]  Ola Pilerot,et al.  LIS research on information sharing activities - people, places, or information , 2012, J. Documentation.

[9]  Gary Priestnall,et al.  Of Catwalk Technologies and Boundary Creatures , 2013, TCHI.

[10]  Niels Windfeld Lund,et al.  Document theory , 2009, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Isto Huvila,et al.  Awkwardness of becoming a boundary object: Mangle and materialities of reports, documentation data, and the archaeological work , 2016, Inf. Soc..

[12]  Tor Hernes,et al.  Studying Composite Boundaries: A Framework of Analysis , 2004 .

[13]  Mary Cavanagh,et al.  Planting contemporary practice theory in the garden of information science , 2011, Inf. Res..

[14]  Da Yu Ou,et al.  Simulation and Optimization for Household Electrical Appliances Production Logistics Based on Remanufacturing , 2013 .

[15]  Theresa Dirndorfer Anderson,et al.  Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science—"Featuring the Future" Settings, arenas and boundary objects: socio-material framings of information practices , 2007 .

[16]  R. Badham,et al.  The Politics of Socio-technical Intervention: An Interactionist View , 2000 .

[17]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Information Work at the Boundaries of Science: Linking Library Services to Research Practices , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[18]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Dynamics of Boundary Objects, Social Infrastructures and Social Identities , 2005, ECIS.

[19]  Lars Björk,et al.  How reproductive is a reproduction? : Digital transmission of text-based documents , 2015 .

[20]  Olof Sundin.  Deflating information: From science studies to documentation , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Todd E. Nicewonger.  Boundary Objects Revisited: A Comparative Analysis of World Making in Avant-Garde Fashion Design and Animal Husbandry , 2015 .

[22]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Documents As Mediating Artifacts in Contemporary IS Development , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  C. Mouffe,et al.  Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics , 1988 .

[24]  G. Wagner,et al.  Fungi and Leaf Surfaces , 2012 .

[25]  Steven J. Landry,et al.  Enabling Collaborative Work Across Different Communities of Practice Through Boundary Objects: Field Studies in Air Traffic Management , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  Alfredo Jornet,et al.  The Matter of Space: Bodily Performances and the Emergence of Boundary Objects During Multidisciplinary Design Meetings , 2015 .

[27]  Patrick Carroll,et al.  Water and technoscientific state formation in California , 2012 .

[28]  Jeanette Eriksson,et al.  Support for Cooperative Design of End-User Tailorable Software , 2008, CEE-SET.

[29]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Introduction: An Agenda for Infrastructure Studies , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Isto Huvila,et al.  The politics of boundary objects: Hegemonic interventions and the making of a document , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Beth A. Bechky.  Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Jeanette Eriksson,et al.  Supporting the Cooperative Design Process of End-User Tailoring , 2008 .

[34]  Kathleen Burnett,et al.  Latinas cross the IT Border: Understanding Gender as a Boundary Object between Information Worlds , 2009, First Monday.

[35]  Jan Löwstedt,et al.  Gaining external knowledge - boundaries in managers' knowledge relations , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[36]  Nadia Caidi,et al.  The Politics of Library Artifacts: The NationalUnion Catalog1 , 2004, The Library Quarterly.

[37]  Geri Gay,et al.  Designing collaboration: comparing cases exploring cultural probes as boundary-negotiating objects , 2013, CSCW '13.

[38]  Ola Pilerot.  Information sharing in the field of design research , 2015, Inf. Res..

[39]  Vladislav Fomin,et al.  Standardization: bridging the gap between economic and social theory , 2000, ICIS.

[40]  Timothy Kuhn,et al.  Negotiating Boundaries between Scholars and Practitioners , 2002 .

[41]  J. Mai.  Folksonomies and the New Order: Authority in the Digital Disorder , 2011 .

[42]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Digital libraries and human values: Human-computer interaction meets social informatics , 2008, ASIST.

[43]  Libby Hemphill,et al.  Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, 2nd ed , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  A. Strauss.  A SOCIAL WORLD PERSPECTIVE* , 2012 .

[45]  Jack Whalen,et al.  Making work visible : ethnographically grounded case studies of work practice , 2011 .

[46]  Kees van Deemter,et al.  Information sharing , 1985, SIGP.

[47]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Texts at work: some thoughts on "Just for You" service in the context of domain expertise. , 1998 .

[48]  Yu-Wei Lin,et al.  A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making , 2011, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[49]  John Seely Brown,et al.  The Social Life of Documents , 1996, First Monday.

[50]  Eva Hourihan Jansen,et al.  ASIST&T SIG CR Doctoral Research Forum Title: A Review of Boundary Objects in Classification Research , 2013 .

[51]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[52]  Isto Huvila,et al.  Authorship and Documentary Boundary Objects , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[53]  Elspeth Oppermann,et al.  The discourse of adaptation to climate change and the UK Climate Impacts Programme: De-scribing the problematization of adaptation , 2011 .

[54]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[55]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Information sharing , 1985, SIGP.

[56]  Pamela J. McKenzie,et al.  Preparing for opening night: temporal boundary objects in textually-mediated professional practice , 2004, Inf. Res..

[57]  Tiffany C. Veinot,et al.  “The Eyes of the Power Company”: Workplace Information Practices of a Vault Inspector1 , 2007, The Library Quarterly.

[58]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  From Findings to Theories: Institutionalizing Social Informatics , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[59]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Open Data Partnerships between Firms and Universities: The Role of Boundary Organizations , 2015 .

[60]  Karen E. Fisher,et al.  Information grounds and the use of need-based services by immigrants in Queens, New York: A context-based, outcome evaluation approach , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[61]  Timothy S. Clark,et al.  Between Innovation and Legitimation— Boundaries and Knowledge Flow in Management Consultancy , 2009 .

[62]  K. K. Cetina.  Postsocial Relations: Theorizing Sociality in a Postsocial Environment , 2001 .

[63]  Reijo Savolainen.  Information Behavior and Information Practice: Reviewing the “Umbrella Concepts” of Information‐Seeking Studies1 , 2007, The Library Quarterly.

[64]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Inscriptions: Toward a Theory of Representing as Social Practice , 1998 .

[65]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[66]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[67]  Kaj U. Koskinen.  Metaphoric boundary objects as co‐ordinating mechanisms in the knowledge sharing of innovation processes , 2005 .

[68]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Policy as Boundary Object: A New Way to Look at Educational Policy Design and Implementation , 2009 .

[69]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Information sharing: an exploration of the literature and some propositions , 2010, Inf. Res..

[70]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[71]  Florence Millerand,et al.  Who are the users? Who are the developers? Webs of users and developers in the development process of a technical standard , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[72]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Information behaviour: an interdisciplinary perspective , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[73]  Oswald Jones,et al.  Mediating Artefacts, Boundary Objects and the Social Construction of Knowledge , 2006 .

[74]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[75]  H. Albrechtsen,et al.  Toward a New Horizon in Information Science: Domain-Analysis , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[76]  Elin K. Jacob,et al.  The Dynamics of Classification Systems as Boundary Objects for Cooperation in the Electronic Library , 1998, Libr. Trends.

[77]  Robert Winter,et al.  Crossing the Line: Overcoming Knowledge Boundaries in Enterprise Transformation , 2015, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[78]  Francis Harvey,et al.  Boundary Objects and the Social Construction of GIS Technology , 1998 .

[79]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[80]  Elizabeth Yakel.  Encoded Archival Description: Are Finding Aids Boundary Spanners or Barriers for Users? , 2004 .

[81]  Gina Nason,et al.  Information Services and Digital Literacy: In Search of the Boundaries of Knowing , 2014, Program.

[82]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Studying Online Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[83]  Laura Ridenour.  Boundary Objects: Measuring Gaps and Overlap Between Research Areas , 2016 .

[84]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Crossing boundaries and conscripting participation: representing and integrating knowledge in a paper machinery project , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[85]  Isto Huvila,et al.  How a museum knows? Structures, work roles, and infrastructures of information work , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[86]  Yasuko Kawatoko,et al.  Space, Time and Documents in a Refrigerated Warehouse , 1999 .

[87]  S. Shackley,et al.  Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority , 1996 .

[88]  Moni Naor,et al.  Social Informatics , 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[89]  Geoffrey Yeo.  Concepts of Record (2) : Prototypes and Boundary Objects , 2008 .

[90]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  CPOE workarounds, boundary objects, and assemblages , 2011, CHI.

[91]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Boundary Objects and Prototypes at the Interfaces of Engineering Design , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[92]  Julia Müller,et al.  Knowledge Sharing between Project Teams and its Cultural Antecedents , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[93]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[94]  Adam Worrall,et al.  The role of digital libraries as boundary objects within and across communities , 2013 .

[95]  P. Trompette,et al.  Revisiting the notion of Boundary Object , 2009 .

[96]  John Seely Brown,et al.  The Social Life of Documents , 1996, First Monday.

[97]  J. McTavish.  A domain-analytic perspective on sexual health in LCSH and RVM , 2011 .

[98]  W. David Holford,et al.  Boundary constructions as knowledge flows within and between work groups , 2016 .

[99]  Joseph T. Tennis,et al.  Epistemology, Theory, and Methodology in Knowledge Organization: Toward a Classification, Metatheory, and Research Framework , 2008 .

[100]  Carsten S. Østerlund.  The Materiality of Communicative Practices The boundaries and objects of an emergency room genre , 2008 .

[101]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[102]  Wai Fong Chua,et al.  The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing , 2001 .

[103]  Roberta Lamb,et al.  As we may remember , 2006, HCC.

[104]  Kimmo Tuominen,et al.  "Isms" in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism , 2005, J. Documentation.

[105]  Lynn Westbrook,et al.  Community information as boundary object: police responsibility for abuse survivors , 2012, J. Documentation.

[106]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[107]  Adam Worrall,et al.  "Like a Real Friendship": Translation, Coherence, and Convergence of Information Values in LibraryThing and Goodreads , 2015 .

[108]  Andrew D. Madden,et al.  Interpreting the world across a boundary: The evolution of information from life's first decisions to the information society , 2014, J. Documentation.

[109]  Bruce R. Schatz,et al.  Transparency beyond the Individual Level of Scale: Convergence between Information Artifacts and Communities of Practice , 2003 .

[110]  Eivor Oborn,et al.  Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams , 2010 .

[111]  R. Briggs,et al.  Association for Information Systems , 2009 .

[112]  Alexandre Fortier.  CAIS 2011 Presentation Proposal A Domain-Analytic Perspective on Sexual Health in LCSH and RVM , 2013 .

[113]  Susan Gasson,et al.  A genealogical study of boundary-spanning IS design , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[114]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Beyond Boundary Objects: Collaborative Reuse in Aircraft Technical Support , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[115]  Jonathan Foster,et al.  Collaborative information seeking and retrieval , 2006, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[116]  R. Freeman,et al.  Documents, Practices and Policy , 2011 .

[117]  Louise Limberg.  Learning assignment as task in information seeking research , 2007, Inf. Res..

[118]  Christopher Wright,et al.  Inside Out? Organizational Membership, Ambiguity and the Ambivalent Identity of the Internal Consultant , 2009 .

[119]  Pamela J. McKenzie,et al.  Producing Storytime: A Collectivist Analysis of Work in a Complex Communicative Space1 , 2007, The Library Quarterly.

[120]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[121]  S. Hunter.  Living documents: A feminist psychosocial approach to the relational politics of policy documentation , 2008 .

[122]  A. Langenohl.  How to change other people's institutions: discursive entrepreneurship and the boundary object of competition/competitiveness in the German banking sector , 2008 .

[123]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design , 2013, CHI.

[124]  Elisabeth Davenport,et al.  Clinical guidelines and the translation of texts into care: overcoming professional conflicts concerning evidence-based practice , 2000, J. Documentation.

[125]  Ann Light,et al.  Research Project as Boundary Object: Negotiating the Conceptual Design of a Tool for International Development , 2009, ECSCW.

[126]  Fritz Heider.  Ding und Medium , 2005 .

[127]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Toward a New Horizon in Information Science: Domain-Analysis , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[128]  Emma Howarth.  The road to federation , 2014 .

[129]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  The affordances of actor network theory in ICT for development research , 2010, Inf. Technol. People.

[130]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Information Worlds: Social Context, Technology, and Information Behavior in the Age of the Internet , 2010 .

[131]  Olof Sundin,et al.  Putting Discourse to Work: Information Practices and the Professional Project of Nurses1 , 2007, The Library Quarterly.

[132]  Chris Kimble,et al.  Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[133]  Barbara P. Buttenfield,et al.  Digital Libraries and Collaborative Knowledge Construction , 2003 .

[134]  Sebastian K. Boell,et al.  Using Heider’s Epistemology of Thing and Medium for Unpacking the Conception of Documents: Gantt Charts and Boundary Objects , 2015 .

[135]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[136]  Anu Kajamaa,et al.  Boundary Breaking in a Hospital: Expansive Learning between the Worlds of Evaluation and Frontline Work. , 2011 .

[137]  De Laat,et al.  Social Informatics: An Information Society for All? , 2006 .

[138]  Chun Wei Choo.  Keynote Address: Information seeking in organizations: epistemic contexts and contests , 2007, Inf. Res..

[139]  Maia Green.  Making Development Agents: Participation as Boundary Object in International Development , 2010 .

[140]  Pamela J. McKenzie,et al.  Documentary tools in everyday life: the wedding planner , 2010, J. Documentation.

[141]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Emergent boundary objects and boundary zones in collaborative design research projects , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[142]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Frameworks for understanding knowledge sharing in open online communities: Boundaries and boundary crossing , 2013 .

[143]  Peter Mambrey,et al.  Understanding the role of documents in a hierarchical flow of work , 1997, GROUP '97.

[144]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Obfuscatocracy: A Stakeholder Analysis of Governing Documents for Virtual Worlds , 2008, First Monday.

[145]  S. Faraj,et al.  Boundary work in knowledge teams. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[146]  M. Feldman,et al.  Ways of Knowing and Inclusive Management Practices , 2006 .

[147]  Deana D. Pennington,et al.  The Dynamics of Material Artifacts in Collaborative Research Teams , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[148]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[149]  Reijo Savolainen.  Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of “way of life” , 1995 .

[150]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[151]  R CarlilePaul.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries , 2002 .

[152]  Nancy A. Vanhouse,et al.  Digital Library Use: Social Practice in Design and Evaluation , 2003 .

[153]  Elaine K. Yakura,et al.  Charting Time: Timelines as Temporal Boundary Objects , 2002 .

[154]  D. Robinson.  Coleridge, Mary Robinson, and the prosody of dreams. , 1997 .

[155]  Megan A. Winget,et al.  Annotations on musical scores by performing musicians: Collaborative models, interactive methods, and music digital library tool development , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[156]  Leon Sterling,et al.  Engineering the social: The role of shared artifacts , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[157]  Jiska Engelbert,et al.  Social construction of reality , 2016 .

[158]  Andrew M. Cox,et al.  An exploration of the practice approach and its place in information science , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[159]  Guo Zhang,et al.  Understanding boundaries: physical, epistemological and virtual dimensions , 2013, Inf. Res..

[160]  Bernd Frohmann,et al.  Documentation Redux: Prolegomenon to (Another) Philosophy of Information , 2004, Libr. Trends.

[161]  Michael Redclift,et al.  European environmental research in the social sciences: research into ecological modernization as a ‘boundary object’ , 2000 .

[162]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Digital Libraries with Embedded Values: Combining Insights from LIS and Science and Technology Studies1 , 2007, The Library Quarterly.

[163]  Jan Nolin,et al.  "Relevance" as a boundary concept: Reconsidering early information retrieval , 2009, J. Documentation.

[164]  Elin K. Jacob,et al.  The everyday world of work: two approaches to the investigation of classification in context , 2001, J. Documentation.

[165]  Allen Hunter,et al.  A discussion of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso, 1985). , 2016 .

[166]  Kajsa Lindberg,et al.  Knotting the action net, or organizing between organizations , 2006 .

[167]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[168]  Ola Pilerot,et al.  Design researchers' information sharing : the enactment of a discipline , 2014 .

[169]  Carsten S. Østerlund.  Documents in Place: Demarcating Places for Collaboration in Healthcare Settings , 2008, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).