When meaningful components interrupt the processing of the whole: the case of fractions.

Numerical fractions are composed of a numerator and a denominator that are natural numbers. These components influence processing of the fraction. This study was conducted to test whether eliminating the fractional components would result in the processing of fractions as unique numerical entities. Participants that learned to relate fractional values to arbitrary figures in a training task showed automatic processing of the numerical values of the new figures. The processing of fractions written in regular form improved following training, but did not show automatic processing. The results suggest that eliminating the influence of the fractional components allowed individual fractions to be represented in long-term memory.

[1]  Y. Okamoto,et al.  Language supports for children's understanding of numerical fractions: cross-national comparisons. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Why frequencies are natural , 2007 .

[3]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Early fraction calculation ability. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[4]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them? , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  The epigenesis of mathematical thinking , 2000 .

[7]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Michael Schneider,et al.  Representations of the magnitudes of fractions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Notation-Independent Representation of Fractions in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Yujing Ni,et al.  Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias , 2005 .

[11]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[12]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  Automatic comparisons of artificial digits never compared: learning linear ordering relations. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Susan Carey,et al.  Never getting to zero: Elementary school students’ understanding of the infinite divisibility of number and matter , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[15]  Koleen McCrink,et al.  Ratio Abstraction by 6-Month-Old Infants , 2007, Psychological science.

[16]  M. Schocke,et al.  The processing and representation of fractions within the brain. An fMRI investigation. , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  On the mental representation of negative numbers: Context-dependent SNARC effects with comparative judgments , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Early understandings of numbers: paths or barriers to the construction of new understandings? , 1998 .

[19]  Margarete Delazer,et al.  The processing and representation of fractions within the brain An fMRI investigation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  Barbara A. Shepperson,et al.  Countable entities: Developmental changes , 1990, Cognition.

[21]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[22]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Do Negative Numbers Have a Place on the Mental Number Line , 2005 .

[23]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A neural model of how the brain represents and compares multi-digit numbers: spatial and categorical processes , 2003, Neural Networks.

[24]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Rational numbers: Componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  Automaticity of two-digit numbers. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins , 2001, Cognition.

[27]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  J. Bargh.  The automaticity of everyday life. , 1997 .

[29]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[30]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Behavioral and Prefrontal Representation of Spatial Proportions in the Monkey , 2008, Current Biology.

[31]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  The Representation of Negative Numbers: Exploring the Effects of Mode of Processing and Notation , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The generative basis of natural number concepts , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions , 2004 .

[34]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[35]  J. Bargh.  The ecology of automaticity: toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[36]  Arava Y. Kallai,et al.  A generalized fraction: an entity smaller than one on the mental number line. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  A. Vinter,et al.  The self-organizing consciousness. , 2002, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[38]  E. Bialystok,et al.  Representing quantity beyond whole numbers: some, none, and part. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[39]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[40]  J. Gibbon.  Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[41]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Comparing 5/7 and 2/9: Adults can do it by accessing the magnitude of the whole fractions. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[42]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[43]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The mental representation of numerical fractions: real or integer? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  G. M. Reicher.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  Ipke Wachsmuth,et al.  IDENTIFYING FRACTIONS ON NUMBER LINES , 1988 .

[46]  Eleanor J. Gibson,et al.  Learning to read , 1965, Science.