Bayes' theorem in the trial process

The use of statistics and probabilities as legal evidence has recently come under increased scrutiny. Judges' and jurors' ability to understand and use this type of evidence has been of special concern. Finkelstein and Fairley (1970) proposed introducing Bayes' theorem into the courtroom to aid the fact-finder evaluate this type of evidence. The present study addressed individuals' ability to use statistical information as well as their ability to understand and use an expert's Bayesian explanation of that evidence. One hundred and eighty continuing education students were presented with a transcript purportedly taken from an actual trial and were asked to make several subjective probabiliy judgments regarding blood-grouping evidence. The results extend to the trial process previous psychological research suggesting that individuals generally underutilize statistical information, as compared to a Bayesian model. In addition, subjects in this study generally ignored the expert's Bayesian explanation of the statistical evidence.

[1]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[2]  P. L. Altman,et al.  Blood and Other Body Fluids , 1961, Pediatrics.

[3]  R. Cattell,et al.  Formal representation of human judgment , 1968 .

[4]  M. P. Dumont.  Comment … , 1970 .

[5]  Michael O. Finkelstein,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence , 1970 .

[6]  W. Ducharme.  Response bias explanation of conservative human inference. , 1970 .

[7]  Michael O. Finkelstein,et al.  The Continuing Debate over Mathematics in the Law of Evidence: A Comment on "Trial by Mathematics" , 1971 .

[8]  Laurence H. Tribe,et al.  The Continuing Debate over Mathematics in the Law of Evidence: A Further Critique of Mathematical Proof , 1971 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[10]  P. Horwich.  Probability and Evidence , 1972 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[12]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[14]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[16]  W. Edwards.  Cognitive Processes and the Assessment of Subjective Probability Distributions: Comment , 1975 .

[17]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[18]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[19]  I. Ajzen.  Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction. , 1977 .

[20]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art , 1977 .

[21]  Lea Brilmayer,et al.  Review: Quantitative Methods and Legal Decisions , 1978 .

[22]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judged frequency of lethal events , 1978 .

[23]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Law and Society Review , 1979 .

[24]  Ira Mark Ellman,et al.  Probabilities and Proof: Can HLA and Blood Group Testing Prove Paternity? , 1979 .

[25]  E. Lind,et al.  Theory testing, theory development, and laboratory research on legal issues , 1979 .

[26]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decision Making and Change in Human Affairs , 1979 .

[27]  S. Diamond,et al.  A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm , 1979 .

[28]  N. Kerr,et al.  Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior , 1979 .

[29]  B. D. Finetti,et al.  Probability, induction and statistics : the art of guessing , 1979 .

[30]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[31]  M. Fishbein.  Progress in social psychology , 1980 .

[32]  M. Bar-Hillel.  The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. , 1980 .

[33]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[34]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[35]  Michael J. Saks,et al.  Human Information Processing and Adjudication: Trial by Heuristics , 1980 .

[36]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  When Do Base Rates Affect Predictions , 1981 .

[37]  Jennifer Crocker,et al.  Judgment of Covariation by Social Perceivers , 1981 .

[38]  D. Schum,et al.  Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence. , 1982 .

[39]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. , 1982 .

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  Causal Schemata in Judgments under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[41]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[42]  Notes on a Grand Illusion: Some Limits on the Use of Bayesian Theory in Evidence Law , 1982 .

[43]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Conservatism in human information processing , 1982 .

[44]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hypothesis Evaluation from a Bayesian Perspective. , 1983 .

[45]  Statistical assessments as evidence in the courts , 1985 .

[46]  D. G. Rees,et al.  Foundations of Statistics , 1989 .

[47]  J. Kaplan,et al.  Cases and Materials On Evidence , 1987 .