Mechanisms for actuated assistive hip orthoses

Mobility is often a central problem for people having muscle weaknesses. The need for new devices to assist walking and walk related activities is therefore growing. Lower limb actuated orthoses have already proven their positive impact with paraplegic patients and are potentially promising for assisting people with weak muscles. However, the transfer from the existing systems of mobilization towards assistance implies several technical challenges as the seamless integration and the reduction of power consumption. In this paper two assistive orthoses which use different types of actuation mechanisms are presented and discussed. The first one is based on a ball screw and an excavator-like mechanism while the second one is based on a double differential actuation. Their technical capabilities are compared and contextualized for diverse activities. Objective characteristics such as the range of motion of the devices, the transparency, the maximal torque that they can provide or the RMS torque during cyclic trajectories are compared to point out which device is better adapted for specific situations. We presented two different hip orthoses with novel types of actuation.The two orthoses are optimized for assistance in various situations.Different characteristics are assessed in order to objectively compare our orthoses.

[1]  Martin Buss,et al.  Compliant actuation of rehabilitation robots , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[2]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  The ReWalk Powered Exoskeleton to Restore Ambulatory Function to Individuals with Thoracic-Level Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[3]  H. Herr,et al.  Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Human Population: The Next Half Century , 2003, Science.

[5]  F. Reynard,et al.  The WalkTrainer—A New Generation of Walking Reeducation Device Combining Orthoses and Muscle Stimulation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  Jerry E. Pratt,et al.  The RoboKnee: an exoskeleton for enhancing strength and endurance during walking , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[7]  Hugh Herr,et al.  Exoskeletons and orthoses: classification, design challenges and future directions , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Power Assist System HAL-3 for Gait Disorder Person , 2002, ICCHP.

[9]  Chee-Meng Chew,et al.  A Haptic Knob with a Hybrid Ultrasonic Motor and Powder Clutch Actuator , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[10]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[11]  Roger Gassert,et al.  Differential-damper topologies for actuators in rehabilitation robotics , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  J. Mizrahi,et al.  Joint torques during sit-to-stand in healthy subjects and people with Parkinson's disease. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  Peter Gwynne,et al.  Technology: Mobility machines , 2013, Nature.

[14]  T. Hortobágyi,et al.  Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  Guillaume Morel,et al.  A methodology to design kinematics of fixations between an orthosis and a human member , 2009, 2009 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[16]  Marco Cempini,et al.  Self-Alignment Mechanisms for Assistive Wearable Robots: A Kinetostatic Compatibility Method , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[17]  Reymond Clavel,et al.  Development of an assistive motorized hip orthosis: Kinematics analysis and mechanical design , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[18]  Frank Sup,et al.  Leveraging gait dynamics to improve efficiency and performance of powered hip exoskeletons , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[19]  M. Goldfarb,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Powered Lower Limb Orthosis to Aid Walking in Paraplegic Individuals , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  D. Winter Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: Variability and compensating effects , 1984 .

[21]  G. Andersson,et al.  Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30-40 years of age. , 1982, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[22]  Mario Cortese,et al.  A Light-weight Exoskeleton for Hip Flexion-extension Assistance , 2013, NEUROTECHNIX.

[23]  François Michaud,et al.  Dual-Differential Rheological Actuator for High-Performance Physical Robotic Interaction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[24]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  New horizons for orthotic and prosthetic technology: artificial muscle for ambulation , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[25]  Hannes Bleuler,et al.  A Double-differential Actuation for an Assistive Hip Orthosis - Specificities and Implementation , 2016, NEUROTECHNIX.

[26]  M. Pandy,et al.  Dynamic optimization of human walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  K. Waldron The constraint analysis of mechanisms , 1966 .

[28]  J. Koval,et al.  Longitudinal Study of Determinants of Dependence in an Elderly Population , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.