Simulation of image detectors in radiology for determination of scatter-to-primary ratios using Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNP/MCNPX.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare and validate three methods to simulate radiographic image detectors with the Monte Carlo software MCNP/MCNPX in a time efficient way. METHODS The first detector model was the standard semideterministic radiography tally, which has been used in previous image simulation studies. Next to the radiography tally two alternative stochastic detector models were developed: A perfect energy integrating detector and a detector based on the energy absorbed in the detector material. Validation of three image detector models was performed by comparing calculated scatter-to-primary ratios (SPRs) with the published and experimentally acquired SPR values. RESULTS For mammographic applications, SPRs computed with the radiography tally were up to 44% larger than the published results, while the SPRs computed with the perfect energy integrating detectors and the blur-free absorbed energy detector model were, on the average, 0.3% (ranging from -3% to 3%) and 0.4% (ranging from -5% to 5%) lower, respectively. For general radiography applications, the radiography tally overestimated the measured SPR by as much as 46%. The SPRs calculated with the perfect energy integrating detectors were, on the average, 4.7% (ranging from -5.3% to -4%) lower than the measured SPRs, whereas for the blur-free absorbed energy detector model, the calculated SPRs were, on the average, 1.3% (ranging from -0.1% to 2.4%) larger than the measured SPRs. CONCLUSIONS For mammographic applications, both the perfect energy integrating detector model and the blur-free energy absorbing detector model can be used to simulate image detectors, whereas for conventional x-ray imaging using higher energies, the blur-free energy absorbing detector model is the most appropriate image detector model. The radiography tally overestimates the scattered part and should therefore not be used to simulate radiographic image detectors.

[1]  Michael Sandborg,et al.  Distributions of scatter-to-primary and signal-to-noise ratios per pixel in digital chest imaging. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(TI) full-field flat panel detector. , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  N W Marshall.  Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  G Panayiotakis,et al.  Monte Carlo generated mammograms: development and validation. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[6]  E. M. Souza,et al.  Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation. , 2008, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[7]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2007, Medical physics.

[8]  W Kalender,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations of x-ray scatter data for diagnostic radiology. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Spencer Gunn,et al.  Introducing DeBRa: a detailed breast model for radiological studies. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  G Panayiotakis,et al.  A Monte Carlo simulation model of mammographic imaging with x-ray sources of finite dimensions. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  D E Peplow,et al.  Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  K Doi,et al.  Physical characteristics of scattered radiation in diagnostic radiology: Monte Carlo simulation studies. , 1985, Medical physics.

[14]  G. Verdu,et al.  Monte Carlo image reconstruction of a mammographic phantom , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  J M Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation. , 2000, Medical physics.

[16]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[17]  D. Rogers,et al.  EGS4 code system , 1985 .

[18]  E. M. Souza,et al.  Methodology for digital radiography simulation using the Monte Carlo code MCNPX for industrial applications. , 2008, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[19]  J. Sempau,et al.  MANTIS: combined x-ray, electron and optical Monte Carlo simulations of indirect radiation imaging systems , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Ioannis S Kandarakis,et al.  Modeling granular phosphor screens by Monte Carlo methods. , 2006, Medical physics.

[21]  Patrik Sund,et al.  What is worse: decreased spatial resolution or increased noise? , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  W Huda,et al.  Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography. , 1998, Medical physics.