The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet.

To people with the necessary technology the internet can provide vast amounts of health information. However, there are concerns about the quality of the information and how it may affect relationships between patients and doctors. Little empirical research has examined how the internet is used by those diagnosed with a serious illness. This study uses in-depth interviews collected for DIPEx projects with men and women with cancer. The analysis is informed by Radley and Billig's (Sociol. Health Illness 2 (1996) 220) observation that accounts of illness require patients to simultaneously display themselves as 'worthy individuals, as more or less fit participants in the social world' and on Arthur Frank's work on quest narratives. Drawing on in-depth interviews with a woman with inflammatory breast cancer and a man with prostate cancer I will demonstrate how the internet has been used not only to gather information and gain support from others but also to make sense of the experience of cancer. The ability to access health information on the internet may provide patients with an opportunity to display a particularly modern marker of competence and social fitness. However, one of the consequences of easier access to health information may be the emergence of a felt imperative to be (or present oneself as) an expert and critical patient, able to question advice and locate effective treatments for oneself.

[1]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Database of patients' experiences (DIPEx): a multi-media approach to sharing experiences and information , 2000, The Lancet.

[2]  Michael Billig,et al.  Accounts of health and illness: Dilemmas and representations , 1996 .

[3]  W. Kearns,et al.  The internet II: Future effects on cognitive behavioral practice , 1996 .

[4]  John Powell,et al.  The WWW of the World Wide Web: Who, What, and Why? , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Michael Hardey,et al.  ‘The Story of My Illness’: Personal Accounts of Illness on the Internet , 2002 .

[6]  M. Hardey.  Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise , 1999 .

[7]  Roger Burrows,et al.  VIRTUAL COMMUNITY CARE? SOCIAL POLICY AND THE EMERGENCE OF COMPUTER MEDIATED SOCIAL SUPPORT , 2000 .

[8]  Richard Gordon.  Doctor in the House , 1952 .

[9]  Sasha Shepperd,et al.  Against internet exceptionalism , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  K Adelhard,et al.  Evaluation of Medical Internet Sites , 1999, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[11]  R. J. Cline,et al.  Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. , 2001, Health education research.

[12]  E. Coiera,et al.  The Internet's challenge to health care provision , 1996, BMJ.

[13]  D H Gustafson,et al.  Access to health information and support: a public highway or a private road? , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  A R Jadad,et al.  Promoting partnerships: challenges for the internet age , 1999, BMJ.

[15]  Qualitative interview study of communication between parents and children about maternal breast cancer. , 2000, BMJ.

[16]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Evidence-based patient choice? , 2001 .

[17]  S. Ziebland,et al.  How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Jo Ann Oravec.  The Resourceful Patient , 2003 .

[19]  G. Williams,et al.  The genesis of chronic illness: narrative re-construction. , 1984, Sociology of health & illness.

[20]  S. McLeod,et al.  The quality of medical information on the Internet. A new public health concern. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Doctors in a wired world: can professionalism survive connectivity? , 2002, The Milbank quarterly.

[22]  Marc Jamoulle,et al.  The quality of medical information on the internet , 2000 .

[23]  C W Oliver,et al.  The quality of surgical information on the Internet. , 1999, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[24]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.