Molecular dynamics scheme for precise estimation of electrostatic interaction via zero-dipole summation principle.

We propose a novel idea, zero-dipole summation, for evaluating the electrostatic energy of a classical particle system, and have composed an algorithm for effectively utilizing the idea for molecular dynamics. It conceptually prevents the nonzero-charge and nonzero-dipole states artificially generated by a simple cutoff truncation. The resulting energy formula is nevertheless represented by a simple pairwise function sum, which enables facile application to high-performance computation. By following a heuristic approach to derive the current electrostatic energy formula, we developed an axiomatic approach to construct the method consistently. Explorations of the theoretical details of our method revealed the structure of the generated error, and we analyzed it by comparisons with other methods. A numerical simulation using liquid sodium chloride confirmed that the current method with a small damping factor yielded sufficient accuracy with a practical cutoff distance region. The current energy function also conducts stable numerical integration in a liquid MD simulation. Our method is an extension of the charge neutralized summation developed by Wolf et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8254 (1999)]. Furthermore, we found that the current method becomes a generalization of the preaveraged potential method proposed by Yakub and Ronchi [J. Chem. Phys. 119, 11556 (2003)], which is based on a viewpoint different from the neutrality. The current study presents these relationships and suggests possibilities for their further applications.

[1]  A. Baumketner,et al.  The influence of different treatments of electrostatic interactions on the thermodynamics of folding of peptides. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[2]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Isotropic periodic sum: a method for the calculation of long-range interactions. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  Claudio Ronchi,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of premelting and melting phase transitions in stoichiometric uranium dioxide. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[4]  D. Tobias,et al.  Electrostatics calculations: recent methodological advances and applications to membranes. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[5]  Mika A. Kastenholz,et al.  Influence of artificial periodicity and ionic strength in molecular dynamics simulations of charged biomolecules employing lattice-sum methods , 2004 .

[6]  A. Baumketner Removing systematic errors in interionic potentials of mean force computed in molecular simulations using reaction-field-based electrostatics. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  James B. Adams,et al.  Interatomic Potentials from First-Principles Calculations: The Force-Matching Method , 1993, cond-mat/9306054.

[8]  P. Koehl Electrostatics calculations: latest methodological advances. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  S. Garofalini,et al.  Dissociative water potential for molecular dynamics simulations. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[10]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Numerical examination of the extended phase‐space volume‐preserving integrator by the Nosé‐Hoover molecular dynamics equations , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Application of MDGRAPE‐3, a special purpose board for molecular dynamics simulations, to periodic biomolecular systems , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[12]  Yoshiteru Yonetani,et al.  Liquid water simulation: a critical examination of cutoff length. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  Martin Neumann,et al.  Dielectric relaxation in water. Computer simulations with the TIP4P potential , 1986 .

[14]  K. Idemitsu,et al.  Evaluation of melting point of UO2 by molecular dynamics simulation , 2009 .

[15]  B. Montgomery Pettitt,et al.  Structural and energetic effects of truncating long ranged interactions in ionic and polar fluids , 1985 .

[16]  Alejandro Gil-Villegas,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of primitive models for ionic systems using the Wolf method , 2006 .

[17]  Rastko Sknepnek,et al.  A Graphics Processing Unit Implementation of Coulomb Interaction in Molecular Dynamics. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[18]  L. Berthier,et al.  Amorphous silica modeled with truncated and screened Coulomb interactions: a molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[19]  D. J. Tildesley,et al.  Equation of state for the Lennard-Jones fluid , 1979 .

[20]  E. Yakub Effective computer simulation of strongly coupled Coulomb fluids , 2006 .

[21]  Xavier Daura,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of a reversibly folding beta-heptapeptide in methanol: influence of the treatment of long-range electrostatic interactions. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[22]  M. Ribeiro High frequency sound velocity in the glass former2Ca(NO3)2∙3KNO3: Molecular dynamics simulations , 2007 .

[23]  Bernard R. Brooks,et al.  New spherical‐cutoff methods for long‐range forces in macromolecular simulation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..

[24]  C. Ronchi,et al.  An efficient method for computation of long-ranged Coulomb forces in computer simulation of ionic fluids , 2003 .

[25]  J. Perram,et al.  Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. I. Lattice sums and dielectric constants , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[26]  J. Weeks,et al.  Local molecular field theory for effective attractions between like charged objects in systems with strong Coulomb interactions , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of a Polyalanine Octapeptide under Ewald Boundary Conditions: Influence of Artificial Periodicity on Peptide Conformation , 2000 .

[28]  Y. Fukunishi,et al.  The Filling Potential Method: A Method for Estimating the Free Energy Surface for Protein−Ligand Docking , 2003 .

[29]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Consistent Molecular Dynamics Scheme Applying the Wolf Summation for Calculating Electrostatic Interaction of Particles(Atomic and molecular physics) , 2008 .

[30]  J. D. Gezelter,et al.  Is the Ewald summation still necessary? Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard for long-range electrostatics. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[31]  Shaul Mukamel,et al.  Vibrational sum-frequency generation spectroscopy at the water/lipid interface: molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  Terry R. Stouch,et al.  Effects of Switching Functions on the Behavior of Liquid Water in Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 1994 .

[33]  C. Ronchi,et al.  A New Method for Computation of Long Ranged Coulomb Forces in Computer Simulation of Disordered Systems , 2005 .

[34]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[35]  T. Desai Molecular dynamics study of screening at ionic surfaces. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[36]  J. Banavar,et al.  Computer Simulation of Liquids , 1988 .

[37]  De-Li Chen,et al.  Atomic charges derived from electrostatic potentials for molecular and periodic systems. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[38]  Leslie Greengard,et al.  A fast algorithm for particle simulations , 1987 .

[39]  S. Phillpot,et al.  Exact method for the simulation of Coulombic systems by spherically truncated, pairwise r−1 summation , 1999 .

[40]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Using the isotropic periodic sum method to calculate long-range interactions of heterogeneous systems. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[41]  Wolf,et al.  Reconstruction of NaCl surfaces from a dipolar solution to the Madelung problem. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[42]  M. Sepliarsky,et al.  Interface effects in ferroelectric PbTiO3 ultrathin films on a paraelectric substrate. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[43]  Pierfranco Demontis,et al.  Application of the Wolf method for the evaluation of Coulombic interactions to complex condensed matter systems: Aluminosilicates and water , 2001 .

[44]  Robert J. Petrella,et al.  Electrostatic energies and forces computed without explicit interparticle interactions: A linear time complexity formulation , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[45]  P. P. Ewald Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale , 1921 .

[46]  J. A. Barker,et al.  Monte Carlo studies of the dielectric properties of water-like models , 1973 .

[47]  Stefan M. Kast,et al.  Enhancement of the wolf damped Coulomb potential: Static, dynamic, and dielectric properties of liquid water from molecular simulation , 2002 .

[48]  L. Onsager Electric Moments of Molecules in Liquids , 1936 .

[49]  William A. Goddard,et al.  Optimal spline cutoffs for Coulomb and van der Waals interactions , 1992 .

[50]  M. P. Tosi,et al.  Ionic sizes and born repulsive parameters in the NaCl-type alkali halides—II: The generalized Huggins-Mayer form☆ , 1964 .