THIS PAPER PRESENTS A METHODOLOGY FOR THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF A MANEUVER LOAD CONTROL SYSTEM TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE AIRFRAME FLEXIBILITY. THE SYSTEM, WHEN SWITCHED ON, IS ABLE TO MINIMIZE THE BENDING MOMENT AUGMENTATION AT A WING STATION NEAR THE WING ROOT DURING AN UNSTEADY LONGITUDINAL MANEUVER. THE REDUCTION OF THE INCREMENTAL WING BENDING MOMENT DUE TO MANEUVERS CAN LEAD TO BENEFITS SUCH AS IMPROVED PAY-LOADS/GROSS WEIGHT CAPABILITIES AND/OR EXTENDED STRUCTURAL FATIGUE LIFE. THE MANEUVER IS PER-FORMED BY FOLLOWING A DESIRED VERTICAL LOAD FACTOR LAW WITH ELEVA-TORS DEFLECTIONS, STARTING FROM THE TRIM EQUILIBRIUM IN LEVEL FLIGHT. THE SYSTEM OBSERVES LOAD FACTOR AND STRUCTURAL BENDING THROUGH ACCELEROMETERS AND CALIBRATED STRAIN SENSORS AND THEN SENDS SIGNALS TO A COMPUTER THAT SYMMETRICALLY ACTUATES AILERONS FOR REDUCING THE STRUCTURAL BENDING AND ELEVATORS FOR COMPENSATING THE PERTUR-BATION TO THE LONGITUDINAL EQUILIBRIUM. THE MAJOR LIMIT OF THIS KIND OF SYSTEMS APPEARS WHEN IT HAS TO BE INSTALLED ON COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT FOR REDUCED OEW OR AUGMENTED WING ASPECT-RATIO. IN THIS CASE EXTENSIVE RAMS ANALYSES AND HIGH REDUNDANCY OF THE MLC RELATED SUB-SYSTEMS ARE REQUIRED BY THE CERTIFICATION AUTHORITY. OTHERWISE THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN MUST BE PERFORMED AT SYSTEM OFF. THUS THE UNIQUE ACTUAL BENEFIT TO BE GAINED FROM THE ADOPTION OF A MLC SYSTEM ON A COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT IS THE FA-TIGUE LIFE EXTENSION. AN APPLICATION TO A BUSINESS AIRCRAFT RESPOND-ING TO THE EASA CERTIFICATION SPECIFICATIONS, PART 25, HAS BEEN PERFORMED. THE AIRCRAFT USED FOR THE NUMERICAL APPLICATION IS CON-SIDERED ONLY AS A TEST CASE-STUDY. MOST OF DESIGN AND ANALYSIS CONSIDERATIONS ARE APPLICABLE ALSO TO OTHER AIRCRAFT, SUCH AS UN-MANNED OR MILITARY ONES, ALTHOUGH SOME DESIGN REQUIREMENTS CAN BE CLEARLY DIFFERENT. THE ESTIMATION OF THE FATIGUE LIFE EXTENSION OF A STRUCTURAL JOINT (WING LOWER SKIN-STRINGER), LOCATED CLOSE TO THE WING ROOT, HAS BEEN ESTIMATED BY SHOWING THE EXPECTED BENEFIT TO BE GAINED FROM THE ADOPTION OF SUCH A MANEUVERING LOAD CONTROL SYSTEM.
[1]
Jan Roskam,et al.
Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight Controls
,
2018
.
[2]
R F O'Connell.
Design, Development and Implementation of an Active Control System for Load Alleviation for a Commercial Transport Airplane,
,
1980
.
[3]
Martin Hromcik,et al.
HYBRID CONTROLLER FOR GUST LOAD ALLEVIATION AND RIDE COMFORT IMPROVEMENT USING DIRECT LIFT CONTROL FLAPS
,
2009
.
[4]
Sigurd Skogestad,et al.
Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning
,
2003
.
[5]
R. F. O'Connell,et al.
Digital active control system for load alleviation for the Lockheed L-1011
,
1981,
The Aeronautical Journal (1968).
[6]
K.-U. Hahn,et al.
ATTAS Flight Test and Simulation Results of the Advanced Gust Management System LARS.
,
1992
.
[7]
S. Skogestad.
Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning
,
2004
.
[8]
Nicola Paletta,et al.
Load Alleviation on a Joined-Wing Unmanned Aircraft
,
2010
.