The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning Statistical Learning

The visual environment contains massive amounts of information involving the relations between objects in space and time, and recent studies of visual statistical learning (VSL) have suggested that this information can be automatically extracted by the visual system. The experiments reported in this article explore the automaticity of VSL in several ways, using both explicit familiarity and implicit response-time measures. The results demonstrate that (a) the input to VSL is gated by selective attention, (b) VSL is nevertheless an implicit process because it operates during a cover task and without awareness of the underlying statistical patterns, and (c) VSL constructs abstracted representations that are then invariant to changes in extraneous surface features. These results fuel the conclusion that VSL both is and is not automatic: It requires attention to select the relevant population of stimuli, but the resulting learning then occurs without intent or awareness.

[1]  C. L. M..  The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[2]  G. Bonanno,et al.  Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes. , 1986, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Kevin J. Hawley,et al.  Contribution of perceptual fluency to recognition judgments. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  S. Rose.  Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[6]  M. A. Stadler,et al.  Role of attention in implicit learning. , 1995 .

[7]  John G. Seamon,et al.  The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. , 1995 .

[8]  J. Elman,et al.  Learning Rediscovered , 1996, Science.

[9]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[10]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Language Acquisition and Use: Learning and Applying Probabilistic Constraints , 1997, Science.

[11]  E. Newport,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article INCIDENTAL LANGUAGE LEARNING: Ustening (and Learning) out of the Comer of Your Ear , 2022 .

[12]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[14]  P. Ashworth,et al.  Handbook of Implicit Learning , 1998 .

[15]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction task , 1998 .

[16]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.

[18]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Which Attention Is Needed for Implicit Sequence Learning , 1999 .

[19]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[20]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[21]  M. Chun,et al.  Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Steven B. Most,et al.  How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness , 2001, Psychological science.

[24]  M. Hauser,et al.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins , 2001, Cognition.

[25]  M. Chun,et al.  Selective attention modulates implicit learning , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Implicit /explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[28]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  C. Fisher,et al.  Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience , 2002, Cognition.

[30]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Marina Nespor,et al.  Signal-Driven Computations in Speech Processing , 2002, Science.

[32]  M. Chun,et al.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[34]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Pattern induction by infant language learners. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[35]  Perception of object trajectories during occlusion constrains statistical learning of visual features , 2004 .

[36]  E. Newport,et al.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Charles D. Yang.  Universal Grammar, statistics or both? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and Structure in Sequence Learning , 2004 .

[39]  Sarah C. Creel,et al.  Distant melodies: statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  M. Hauser,et al.  Learning at a distance II. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in a non-human primate , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Role of attention and perceptual grouping in visual statistical learning. , 2004, Psychological science.

[42]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  R. Peereman,et al.  Learning Nonadjacent Dependencies: No Need for Algebraic-like Computations Is It Possible to Learn the Relation between 2 Nonadjacent Events? , 2004 .

[44]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Implicit learning of ignored visual context. , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  R. Aslin,et al.  Encoding multielement scenes: statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  Steven B. Most,et al.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.

[47]  J. Mehler,et al.  Linguistic Constraints on Statistical Computations , 2005, Psychological science.

[48]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Infant-Directed Speech Facilitates Word Segmentation. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[49]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  What Face Inversion Does to Infants' Counting Abilities , 2005, Psychological science.

[50]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking (MOT): II. Inhibition of moving nontargets , 2006 .

[51]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Inattentional blindness , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[52]  R. Kronauer,et al.  Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized , 2022 .