Microelectronic package characterisation using scanning acoustic microscopy

In a highly competitive market, reliable techniques for manufacturing quality control of electronic devices are demanded. Characterisation of modern microelectronic package integrity becomes more difficult due to the continued miniaturisation of electronic device and the complexity of advanced micro-assembling technologies such as chip-scale packages and 3D IC stacks. In this paper, sparse representations of acoustic signals are sought to improve the scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM), a common non-destructive tool for failure analysis of microelectronic packages. Sparse representation of an ultrasonic signal is obtained by decomposing it in an overcomplete dictionary. Detection and location of ultrasonic echoes are then performed on the basis of the resulting redundant representation. The method offers a solution to the deconvolution problem for restoration of the ultrasonic reflectivity function. It can restore closely space overlapping echoes beyond the resolution of the conventional SAM system. It also produces high resolution and accurate estimates for ultrasonic echo parameters, i.e., time-of-flight, amplitude, centre frequency, and bandwidth. These merits of the proposed method are explored in various potential applications for microelectronic package characterisation.

[1]  S. Canumalla Critical issues in thin layer acoustic image interpretation and metrology for microelectronics , 2002, 52nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2002. (Cat. No.02CH37345).

[2]  J. Saniie,et al.  Model-based estimation of ultrasonic echoes. Part I: Analysis and algorithms , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse Bayesian learning for basis selection , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[4]  Joseph F. Murray,et al.  Dictionary Learning Algorithms for Sparse Representation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[5]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: a re-weighted minimum norm algorithm , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Natasa Kovacevic,et al.  Algorithm 820: A flexible implementation of matching pursuit for Gabor functions on the interval , 2002, TOMS.

[7]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  D.M. Harvey,et al.  Advanced acoustic microimaging using sparse signal representation for the evaluation of microelectronic packages , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging.

[9]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Wavelet Shrinkage: Asymptopia? , 1995 .

[10]  Guang-Ming Zhang,et al.  Resolution improvement of acoustic microimaging by continuous wavelet transform for semiconductor inspection , 2006, Microelectron. Reliab..

[11]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Learning Overcomplete Representations , 2000, Neural Computation.

[12]  J. Saniie,et al.  Model-based estimation of ultrasonic echoes. Part II: Nondestructive evaluation applications , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  David Harvey,et al.  High-resolution AMI technique for evaluation of microelectronic packages , 2004 .

[14]  D. Donoho,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 2001 .

[15]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Blind Source Separation by Sparse Decomposition in a Signal Dictionary , 2001, Neural Computation.

[17]  Sheng Liu,et al.  Defects pattern recognition for flip chip solder joint quality inspection with laser ultrasound and interferometer , 2002, 52nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2002. (Cat. No.02CH37345).

[18]  Guang-Ming Zhang,et al.  An improved acoustic microimaging technique with learning overcomplete representation , 2005 .