Compliant control for soft robots: Emergent behavior of a tendon driven anthropomorphic arm

With the accelerated development of robot technologies, optimal control becomes one of the central themes of research. In traditional approaches, the controller, by its internal functionality, finds appropriate actions on the basis of the history of sensor values, guided by the goals, intentions, objectives, learning schemes, and so forth. While very successful with classical robots, these methods run into severe difficulties when applied to soft robots, a new field of robotics with large interest for human-robot interaction. We claim that a novel controller paradigm opens new perspective for this field. This paper applies a recently developed neuro controller with differential extrinsic synaptic plasticity to a muscle-tendon driven arm-shoulder system from the Myorobotics toolkit. In the experiments, we observe a vast variety of self-organized behavior patterns: when left alone, the arm realizes pseudo-random sequences of different poses. By applying physical forces, the system can be entrained into definite motion patterns like wiping a table. Most interestingly, after attaching an object, the controller gets in a functional resonance with the object's internal dynamics, starting to shake spontaneously bottles half-filled with water or sensitively driving an attached pendulum into a circular mode. When attached to the crank of a wheel the neural system independently develops to rotate it. In this way, the robot discovers affordances of objects its body is interacting with.

[1]  Ralf Der,et al.  Self-organized control for musculoskeletal robots , 2016, 1602.02990.

[2]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Morphological Computation - Connecting Brain, Body, and Environment , 2006, Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[3]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Self-organization of reflexive behavior from spontaneous motor activity , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  How the body shapes the way we think - a new view on intelligence , 2006 .

[5]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  Design Approach of Biologically-Inspired Musculoskeletal Humanoids , 2013 .

[6]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  The challenges ahead for bio-inspired 'soft' robotics , 2012, CACM.

[7]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  The role of feedback in morphological computation with compliant bodies , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Richard Sproat,et al.  Morphology and computation , 1992 .

[9]  Veljko Potkonjak,et al.  The Puller-Follower Control Concept in the Multi-Jointed Robot Body with Antagonistically Coupled Compliant Drives , 2011 .

[10]  Veljko Potkonjak,et al.  Anthropomimetic robot with passive compliance - Contact dynamics and control , 2011, 2011 19th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED).

[11]  Ralf Der,et al.  Novel plasticity rule can explain the development of sensorimotor intelligence , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Toward Anthropomimetic Robotics: Development, Simulation, and Control of a Musculoskeletal Torso , 2013, Artificial Life.

[13]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Computed muscle control for an anthropomimetic elbow joint , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Rolf Pfeifer Morphological Computation - Connecting Brain, Body, and Environment , 2006, Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[15]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.