Worker Cooperation and the Ratchet Effect

Workers paid by the piece should be happy to introduce new techniques that increase output, but firms always seem to reduce the piece rate when workers start earning too much money. Workers respond by restricting output and keeping good new ideas to themselves. We show that this outcome is inevitable in a competitive environment. However, there are noncompetitive situations where firms can use piece rates to get cooperation from their workers. These predictions are consistent with case history evidence from the cotton spinning industry in England in the nineteenth century and the Lincoln Electric Company in the United States even today.

[1]  W. Bentley MacLeod,et al.  The Ratchet Effect and the Market for Secondhand Workers , 1992, Journal of Labor Economics.

[2]  M. Huberman How did labor markets work in lancashire? more evidence on prices and quantities in cotton spinning, 1822–1852 , 1991 .

[3]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[4]  W. MacLeod,et al.  Multiskilling, Technical Change and the Japanese Firm , 1991 .

[5]  W. Lazonick,et al.  Production Relations, Labor Productivity, and Choice of Technique: British and U.S. Cotton Spinning , 1981, The Journal of Economic History.

[6]  W. MacLeod,et al.  Implicit Contracts, Incentive Com-patibility, and Involuntary Unemployment , 1989 .

[7]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  British factory, Japanese factory , 1973 .

[8]  J. Tirole,et al.  Planning Under Incomplete Information and the Ratchet Effect. , 1985 .

[9]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  Salaries and Piece Rates , 1986 .

[10]  Tor Eriksson,et al.  Pay Spread and Skewness, Employee Effort and Firm Productivity , 2001 .

[11]  J. Stiglitz Incentives, Risk, and Information: Notes Towards a Theory of Hierarchy , 1975 .

[12]  M. Huberman Invisible Handshakes in Lancashire: Cotton Spinning in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century , 1986, The Journal of Economic History.

[13]  R. Gibbons Piece-Rate Incentive Schemes , 1987, Journal of Labor Economics.

[14]  W. Lazonick,et al.  Industrial Relations and Technical Change: The Case of the Self-Acting Mule , 1979 .