The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by Swiss listed companies

The aim of this paper is to relate the extent of disclosure in the annual reports of Swiss listed companies to possible determinants representing agency and political costs. The choice of Switzerland is based on the fact that, prior to the implementation of the new company law on 1 July 1992 Swiss disclosure requirements were very low, so that the major part of the content of the annual report could be considered as voluntarily disclosed. The sample includes the 1991 annual report of 161 industrial and commercial firms. The extent of disclosure is measured by an index based on information whose disclosure is required by the Fourth and Seventh EU Directives. Independent variables are measures of company size, leverage, profitability, ownership structure, internationality, auditor's size, percentage of fixed assets and industry type. Relations are assessed using univariate analyses and multiple regressions. The main result is that size and internationality play a major role in the disclosure policy of firms, large and internationally diversified companies tending to disclose more information than small purely domestic enterprises.

[1]  Michael Gibbins,et al.  THE MANAGEMENT OF CORPORATE FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE - OPPORTUNISM, RITUALISM, POLICIES, AND PROCESSES , 1990 .

[2]  S. Gray,et al.  Globalization of Stock Markets and Foreign Listing Requirements: Voluntary Disclosures by Continental European Companies Listed on the London Stock Exchange , 1989 .

[3]  M. Firth.  The Impact of Size, Stock Market Listing, and Auditors on Voluntary Disclosure in Corporate Annual Reports , 1979 .

[4]  Alan R. Cerf,et al.  Corporate reporting and investment decisions , 1961 .

[5]  Frederick D. S. Choi.  Financial Disclosure and Entry to the European Capital Market , 1973 .

[6]  Terence Cooke,et al.  The Impact of Size, Stock Market Listing and Industry Type on Disclosure in the Annual Reports of Japanese Listed Corporations , 1992 .

[7]  Jerold L. Zimmerman,et al.  Voluntary Corporate Disclosure: The Case of Interim Reporting , 1981 .

[8]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis , 1987 .

[9]  Stephen L. Buzby.  COMPANY SIZE, LISTED VERSUS UNLISTED STOCKS, AND EXTENT OF FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE , 1975 .

[10]  Ronald A. Dye,et al.  Strategic Accounting Choice And The Effects Of Alternative Financial-Reporting Requirements , 1985 .

[11]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE , 1976 .

[12]  Gerald L. Salamon,et al.  COMPANY SIZE AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS WITH EVIDENCE FROM THE SEGMENTAL REPORTING ISSUE , 1980 .

[13]  Kamal Naser,et al.  Firm-specific determinants of the comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong , 1995 .

[14]  R. S. O. Wallace,et al.  Corporate Financial Reporting in Nigeria , 1988 .

[15]  B. Lev.  ON THE USEFULNESS OF EARNINGS AND EARNINGS RESEARCH: LESSONS AND DIRECTIONS FROM TWO DECADES OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 1989 .

[16]  S. Myers.  Determinants of corporate borrowing , 1977 .

[17]  George Foster,et al.  Corporate Financial-Reporting - A Methodological Review Of Empirical-Research , 1982 .

[18]  Terence Cooke,et al.  Disclosure in the Corporate Annual Reports of Swedish Companies , 1989 .

[19]  Stephen L Taylor,et al.  DISCRETIONARY DISCLOSURE OF RESERVES BY OIL AND GAS COMPANIES: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[20]  Araceli Mora,et al.  The Relationship Between the Comprehensiveness of Corporate Annual Reports and Firm Characteristics in Spain , 1994 .