Forest Drought Resistance at Large Geographic Scales

Forest conservation and carbon sequestration efforts are on the rise, yet the long‐term stability of these efforts under a changing climate remains unknown. We generate nearly three decades of remotely sensed canopy water content throughout California, which we use to determine patterns of drought stress. Linking these patterns of drought stress with meteorological variables enables us to quantify spatially explicit biophysical drought resistance in terms of magnitude and duration. These maps reveal significant spatial heterogeneity in drought resistance and demonstrate that almost all forests have less resistance to severe, persistent droughts. By identifying the spatial patterning of biophysical drought resistance, we quantify an important component of long‐term ecosystem stability that can be used for forest conservation, management, and policy decisions.

[1]  C. W. Thornthwaite.  An approach toward a rational classification of climate. , 1948 .

[2]  C. S. Holling.  Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[3]  S. Pimm.  The complexity and stability of ecosystems , 1984, Nature.

[4]  A. Goetz,et al.  Column atmospheric water vapor and vegetation liquid water retrievals from Airborne Imaging Spectrometer data , 1990 .

[5]  N. Stephenson.  Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[6]  J. Downing,et al.  Biodiversity and stability in grasslands , 1996, Nature.

[7]  J. Overpeck,et al.  2000 Years of Drought Variability in the Central United States , 1998 .

[8]  Claudia M. Castaneda,et al.  Estimating Canopy Water Content of Chaparral Shrubs Using Optical Methods , 1998 .

[9]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[10]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series Incorporating Second-order Functional Knowledge for Better Option Pricing Incorporating Second-order Functional Knowledge for Better Option Pricing , 2022 .

[11]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[12]  S. Díaz,et al.  Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes , 2001 .

[13]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Leaf to Landscape , 2004 .

[14]  Thomas H. Painter,et al.  Measuring the expressed abundance of the three phases of water with an imaging spectrometer over melting snow , 2006 .

[15]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Carnegie Airborne Observatory: in-flight fusion of hyperspectral imaging and waveform light detection and ranging for three-dimensional studies of ecosystems , 2007 .

[16]  J. Hicke,et al.  Cross-scale Drivers of Natural Disturbances Prone to Anthropogenic Amplification: The Dynamics of Bark Beetle Eruptions , 2008 .

[17]  C. Daly,et al.  Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States , 2008 .

[18]  A. Goetz,et al.  Atmospheric correction algorithms for hyperspectral remote sensing data of land and ocean , 2009 .

[19]  N. McDowell,et al.  A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests , 2010 .

[20]  A. Hamann,et al.  Geographic variation in growth response of Douglas‐fir to interannual climate variability and projected climate change , 2010 .

[21]  G. Aronne,et al.  Morpho-Anatomical Traits for Plant Adaptation to Drought , 2012 .

[22]  U. Niinemets,et al.  Developmental changes in mesophyll diffusion conductance and photosynthetic capacity under different light and water availabilities in Populus tremula: how structure constrains function. , 2012, Plant, cell & environment.

[23]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Carnegie Airborne Observatory-2: Increasing science data dimensionality via high-fidelity multi-sensor fusion , 2012 .

[24]  L. Anderegg,et al.  Not all droughts are created equal: translating meteorological drought into woody plant mortality. , 2013, Tree physiology.

[25]  L. Anderegg,et al.  Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress , 2013 .

[26]  Keith R Hayes,et al.  Exposure of trees to drought-induced die-off is defined by a common climatic threshold across different vegetation types , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[27]  Zachary A. Holden,et al.  Tracking Interannual Streamflow Variability with Drought Indices in the U.S. Pacific Northwest , 2014 .

[28]  Nate G. McDowell,et al.  On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene , 2015 .

[29]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Progressive forest canopy water loss during the 2012–2015 California drought , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  S. Robeson.  Revisiting the recent California drought as an extreme value , 2015 .

[31]  N. Diffenbaugh,et al.  Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Joshua H. Viers,et al.  The fire frequency‐severity relationship and the legacy of fire suppression in California forests , 2015 .

[33]  F. Biondi,et al.  Pervasive drought legacies in forest ecosystems and their implications for carbon cycle models , 2015, Science.

[34]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[35]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes , 2015, Nature.

[36]  Martín Abadi,et al.  TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems , 2016, ArXiv.

[37]  James S. Clark,et al.  The impacts of increasing drought on forest dynamics, structure, and biodiversity in the United States , 2016, Global change biology.

[38]  Supratim Basu,et al.  Plant adaptation to drought stress , 2016, F1000Research.

[39]  Marc Macias-Fauria,et al.  Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability , 2016, Nature.

[40]  Jordi Martínez-Vilalta,et al.  Structural overshoot of tree growth with climate variability and the global spectrum of drought‐induced forest dieback , 2017, Global change biology.

[41]  P. Brodrick,et al.  Remotely sensed predictors of conifer tree mortality during severe drought , 2017 .

[42]  Michael Dixon,et al.  Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone , 2017 .

[43]  A. Latimer,et al.  Long-term climate and competition explain forest mortality patterns under extreme drought. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[44]  G. Asner,et al.  Airborne laser-guided imaging spectroscopy to map forest trait diversity and guide conservation , 2017, Science.

[45]  Tarin Paz-Kagan,et al.  What mediates tree mortality during drought in the southern Sierra Nevada? , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[46]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Landscape-scale variation in canopy water content of giant sequoias during drought , 2017, Forest Ecology and Management.

[47]  G. Asner,et al.  Leaf to landscape responses of giant sequoia to hotter drought: An introduction and synthesis for the special section , 2018, Forest Ecology and Management.

[48]  S. Pacala,et al.  Tree carbon allocation explains forest drought-kill and recovery patterns. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[49]  B. Choat,et al.  Triggers of tree mortality under drought , 2018, Nature.

[50]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Remote measurement of canopy water content in giant sequoias (Sequoiadendron giganteum) during drought , 2017, Forest Ecology and Management.

[51]  W. Cohen,et al.  Visual interpretation and time series modeling of Landsat imagery highlight drought's role in forest canopy declines , 2018, Ecosphere.