Clinically oriented prediction of patient response to targeted and immunotherapies from the tumor transcriptome

Background Precision oncology is gradually advancing into mainstream clinical practice, demonstrating significant survival benefits. However, eligibility and response rates remain limited in many cases, calling for better predictive biomarkers. Methods We present ENLIGHT, a transcriptomics-based computational approach that identifies clinically relevant genetic interactions and uses them to predict a patient’s response to a variety of therapies in multiple cancer types, without training on previous treatment response data. We study ENLIGHT in two translationally oriented scenarios: Personalized Oncology (PO), aimed at prioritizing treatments for a single patient, and Clinical Trial Design (CTD), selecting the most likely responders in a patient cohort. Findings Evaluating ENLIGHT’s performance on 21 blinded clinical trial datasets in the PO setting, we show that it can effectively predict a patient’s treatment response across multiple therapies and cancer types. Its prediction accuracy is better than previously published transcriptomics-based signatures and is comparable to that of supervised predictors developed for specific indications and drugs. In combination with the IFN-γsignature, ENLIGHT achieves an odds ratio larger than 4 in predicting response to immune checkpoint therapy. In the CTD scenario, ENLIGHT can potentially enhance clinical trial success for immunotherapies and other monoclonal antibodies by excluding non-responders, while overall achieving more than 90% of the response rate attainable under an optimal exclusion strategy. Conclusion ENLIGHT demonstrably enhances the ability to predict therapeutic response across multiple cancer types from the bulk tumor transcriptome. Funding This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program, NIH and by the Israeli Innovation Authority.

[1]  F. He,et al.  CTR-DB, an omnibus for patient-derived gene expression signatures correlated with cancer drug response , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  F. Markowetz,et al.  Multi-omic machine learning predictor of breast cancer therapy response , 2021, Nature.

[3]  A. Haslam,et al.  Anticancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration From 2009 to 2020 According to Their Mechanism of Action , 2021, JAMA network open.

[4]  P. Wen,et al.  A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma , 2021, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  Rajvi Patel,et al.  Impact of Precision Medicine on Clinical Outcomes: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[6]  D. Berry,et al.  Durvalumab with olaparib and paclitaxel for high-risk HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial. , 2021, Cancer cell.

[7]  Y. Jeng,et al.  Exploring Markers of Exhausted CD8 T Cells to Predict Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2021, Liver Cancer.

[8]  Yixue Li,et al.  Large-scale pharmacogenomic studies and drug response prediction for personalized cancer medicine. , 2021, Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao.

[9]  E. Ruppin,et al.  Synthetic lethality-mediated precision oncology via the tumor transcriptome , 2021, Cell.

[10]  L. Esserman,et al.  Circulating tumor DNA and magnetic resonance imaging to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and recurrence risk , 2021, NPJ breast cancer.

[11]  Joshua M. Dempster,et al.  Integrated cross-study datasets of genetic dependencies in cancer , 2020, Nature Communications.

[12]  David J. Sims,et al.  Molecular Landscape and Actionable Alterations in a Genomically Guided Cancer Clinical Trial: National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Jinyu Yu,et al.  Ratio of the interferon-γ signature to the immunosuppression signature predicts anti-PD-1 therapy response in melanoma , 2020, bioRxiv.

[14]  R. Kurzrock,et al.  Review of precision cancer medicine: Evolution of the treatment paradigm. , 2020, Cancer treatment reviews.

[15]  Ron Edgar,et al.  NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository , 2020 .

[16]  Mary Goldman,et al.  Genomic basis for RNA alterations in cancer , 2020, Nature.

[17]  D. Cutler Early Returns From the Era of Precision Medicine. , 2020, JAMA.

[18]  L. Siu,et al.  Molecular profiling for precision cancer therapies , 2020, Genome medicine.

[19]  A. Kesselheim,et al.  Response Rates and Durations of Response for Biomarker-Based Cancer Drugs in Nonrandomized Versus Randomized Trials. , 2020, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[20]  J. Doroshow,et al.  Genomics and the History of Precision Oncology. , 2020, Surgical oncology clinics of North America.

[21]  Aviad Tsherniak,et al.  Extracting Biological Insights from the Project Achilles Genome-Scale CRISPR Screens in Cancer Cell Lines , 2019, bioRxiv.

[22]  J Jack Lee,et al.  Genomic and transcriptomic profiling expands precision cancer medicine: the WINTHER trial , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[23]  Adam A. Friedman,et al.  Genome‐wide prediction of synthetic rescue mediators of resistance to targeted and immunotherapy , 2018, bioRxiv.

[24]  J. Sicklick,et al.  Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[25]  R. Rabadán,et al.  Immune and genomic correlates of response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in glioblastoma , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[26]  Nuno A. Fonseca,et al.  ArrayExpress update – from bulk to single-cell expression data , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Synthetic Lethal Networks for Precision Oncology: Promises and Pitfalls. , 2018, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  X. Liu,et al.  Signatures of T cell dysfunction and exclusion predict cancer immunotherapy response , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[29]  V. Mazzaferro,et al.  Molecular predictors of prevention of recurrence in HCC with sorafenib as adjuvant treatment and prognostic factors in the phase 3 STORM trial , 2018, Gut.

[30]  E. Ruppin,et al.  Harnessing synthetic lethality to predict the response to cancer treatment , 2018, Nature Communications.

[31]  Paul A Clemons,et al.  A precision oncology approach to the pharmacological targeting of mechanistic dependencies in neuroendocrine tumors , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[32]  Jörg Menche,et al.  Map of synthetic rescue interactions for the Fanconi anemia DNA repair pathway identifies USP48 , 2018, Nature Communications.

[33]  Virginia G Kaklamani,et al.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21‐Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Overexpression of BLM promotes DNA damage and increased sensitivity to platinum salts in triple-negative breast and serous ovarian cancers , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[35]  T. Chan,et al.  Tumor and Microenvironment Evolution during Immunotherapy with Nivolumab , 2017, Cell.

[36]  J. Lunceford,et al.  IFN-&ggr;–related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade , 2017, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[37]  G. Pupo,et al.  PD-L1 Expression and Immune Escape in Melanoma Resistance to MAPK Inhibitors , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[38]  Ann E. Sizemore,et al.  Computational correction of copy-number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[39]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  PARP inhibitors: Synthetic lethality in the clinic , 2017, Science.

[40]  J. Wargo,et al.  Primary, Adaptive, and Acquired Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy , 2017, Cell.

[41]  J. Lunceford,et al.  IFN- γ –related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade , 2017 .

[42]  Deborah Schrag,et al.  Precision Oncology: Who, How, What, When, and When Not? , 2017, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[43]  M. Dolled-Filhart,et al.  Development of a Companion Diagnostic for Pembrolizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Immunohistochemistry for Programmed Death Ligand-1. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[44]  D. Generali,et al.  Integrated evaluation of PAM50 subtypes and immune modulation of pCR in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and HER2-targeted agents in the CherLOB trial. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[45]  L. V. van't Veer,et al.  70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  Ludmila V. Danilova,et al.  The Intratumoral Balance between Metabolic and Immunologic Gene Expression Is Associated with Anti–PD-1 Response in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2016, Cancer Immunology Research.

[47]  Trey Ideker,et al.  A Network of Conserved Synthetic Lethal Interactions for Exploration of Precision Cancer Therapy. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[48]  J. Taube,et al.  Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[49]  J. Carpten,et al.  Translating RNA sequencing into clinical diagnostics: opportunities and challenges , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[50]  L. De Cecco,et al.  Functional Genomics Uncover the Biology behind the Responsiveness of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer Patients to Cetuximab , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[51]  Arul M Chinnaiyan,et al.  Translating cancer genomes and transcriptomes for precision oncology , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[52]  S. Bicciato,et al.  Prospective Biomarker Analysis of the Randomized CHER-LOB Study Evaluating the Dual Anti-HER2 Treatment With Trastuzumab and Lapatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. , 2015, The oncologist.

[53]  O. Gevaert,et al.  Combining bevacizumab and chemoradiation in rectal cancer. Translational results of the AXEBeam trial , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[54]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles , 2015, Nature Methods.

[55]  Jean Y. Tang,et al.  Smoothened variants explain the majority of drug resistance in basal cell carcinoma. , 2015, Cancer cell.

[56]  N. Hacohen,et al.  Molecular and Genetic Properties of Tumors Associated with Local Immune Cytolytic Activity , 2015, Cell.

[57]  R. Foà,et al.  Chlorambucil plus rituximab with or without maintenance rituximab as first‐line treatment for elderly chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients , 2014, American journal of hematology.

[58]  G. Pupo,et al.  BRAF Inhibitor Resistance Mechanisms in Metastatic Melanoma: Spectrum and Clinical Impact , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[59]  Anton Belousov,et al.  Research-Based PAM50 Subtype Predictor Identifies Higher Responses and Improved Survival Outcomes in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the NOAH Study , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[60]  N. Pavlidis,et al.  A study of gene expression markers for predictive significance for bevacizumab benefit in patients with metastatic colon cancer: a translational research study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[61]  Gary Ruvkun,et al.  Human disease locus discovery and mapping to molecular pathways through phylogenetic profiling , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[62]  L. Tanoue,et al.  The National Comprehensive Cancer Network , 1998, Cancer.

[63]  Yuan Qi,et al.  Cell Line Derived Multi-Gene Predictor of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Validation Study on US Oncology 02-103 Clinical Trial , 2012, BMC Medical Genomics.

[64]  Michael Peyton,et al.  An Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition Gene Signature Predicts Resistance to EGFR and PI3K Inhibitors and Identifies Axl as a Therapeutic Target for Overcoming EGFR Inhibitor Resistance , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[65]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Seventeen-gene signature from enriched Her2/Neu mammary tumor-initiating cells predicts clinical outcome for human HER2+:ERα− breast cancer , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Lee T. Sam,et al.  Personalized Oncology Through Integrative High-Throughput Sequencing: A Pilot Study , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[67]  H. Ikeuchi,et al.  Gene expression signature and response to the use of leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer patients , 2011, Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico.

[68]  Bob Löwenberg,et al.  A 2-gene classifier for predicting response to the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2007, Blood.

[69]  E. Wherry,et al.  Molecular signature of CD8+ T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. , 2007, Immunity.

[70]  David C. Atkins,et al.  Identification of Molecular Predictors of Response in a Study of Tipifarnib Treatment in Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[71]  A. Alavi,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges , 1998, In Vitro Diagnostic Industry in China.

[72]  Gavin D. Grant,et al.  Common markers of proliferation , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[73]  S. Gabriel,et al.  EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy , 2004, Science.

[74]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer , 2002, Nature.

[75]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[76]  Alex E. Lash,et al.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[77]  M. Roussel,et al.  Apoptosis Triggered by Myc-Induced Suppression of Bcl-XL or Bcl-2 Is Bypassed during Lymphomagenesis , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[78]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[79]  C. Baird,et al.  The pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[80]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs. , 1997, Science.

[81]  Donald M. Steinwachs,et al.  Promises and pitfalls of the , 1997 .