The human task-evoked pupillary response function is linear: Implications for baseline response scaling in pupillometry

The human task-evoked pupillary response provides a sensitive physiological index of the intensity and online resource demands of numerous cognitive processes (e.g., memory retrieval, problem solving, or target detection). Cognitive pupillometry is a well-established technique that relies upon precise measurement of these subtle response functions. Baseline variability of pupil diameter is a complex artifact that typically necessitates mathematical correction. A methodological paradox within pupillometry is that linear and nonlinear forms of baseline scaling both remain accepted baseline correction techniques, despite yielding highly disparate results. The task-evoked pupillary response (TEPR) could potentially scale nonlinearly, similar to autonomic functions such as heart rate, in which the amplitude of an evoked response diminishes as the baseline rises. Alternatively, the TEPR could scale similarly to the cortical hemodynamic response, as a linear function that is independent of its baseline. However, the TEPR cannot scale both linearly and nonlinearly. Our aim was to adjudicate between linear and nonlinear scaling of human TEPR. We manipulated baseline pupil size by modulating the illuminance in the testing room as participants heard abrupt pure-tone transitions (Exp. 1) or visually monitored word lists (Exp. 2). Phasic pupillary responses scaled according to a linear function across all lighting (dark, mid, bright) and task (tones, words) conditions, demonstrating that the TEPR is independent of its baseline amplitude. We discuss methodological implications and identify a need to reevaluate past pupillometry studies.

[1]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Categories & Subject Descriptors: H.5.2 [Information , 2022 .

[3]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al.  The eye as a window to the listening brain: Neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load , 2014, NeuroImage.

[5]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[6]  J. Bradshaw Background light intensity and the pupillary response in a reaction time task , 1969 .

[7]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Pupillary Responses to Words That Convey a Sense of Brightness or Darkness , 2017, Psychological science.

[8]  Ronen Hershman,et al.  A novel blink detection method based on pupillometry noise , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[9]  D. Brainard,et al.  Opponent melanopsin and S-cone signals in the human pupillary light response , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Paola Binda,et al.  Attention to Bright Surfaces Enhances the Pupillary Light Reflex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli , 1960, Science.

[13]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  A Model Relating Pupil Diameter to Mental Workload and Lighting Conditions , 2016, CHI.

[14]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  H. J. Wyatt The form of the human pupil , 1995, Vision Research.

[16]  Douglas P Munoz,et al.  A circuit for pupil orienting responses: implications for cognitive modulation of pupil size , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  B. Laeng,et al.  The Eye Pupil Adjusts to Imaginary Light , 2014, Psychological science.

[18]  Fang Chen,et al.  Pupillary Response Based Cognitive Workload Measurement under Luminance Changes , 2011, INTERACT.

[19]  N. Hayashi,et al.  Effect of intensity of dynamic exercise on pupil diameter in humans. , 2010, Journal of physiological anthropology.

[20]  D. Lakens Equivalence Tests , 2017, Social psychological and personality science.

[21]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[22]  J. Lacey,et al.  THE EVALUATION OF AUTONOMIC RESPONSES: TOWARD A GENERAL SOLUTION , 1956, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  I. E. Loewenfeld,et al.  The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications , 1999 .

[24]  Canan Karatekin,et al.  Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[25]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[26]  Albert Costa,et al.  Lying in a native and foreign language , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[27]  M. P. Janisse Pupillometry: Some Advances, Problems and Solutions , 1974 .

[28]  Christoph W Korn,et al.  A solid frame for the window on cognition: Modeling event-related pupil responses. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[29]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Novel Blink Detection Method Based on Pupillometry Noise , 2018 .

[30]  Sebastiaan Mathôt,et al.  Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[31]  J. Beatty Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982 .

[32]  W W Tryon,et al.  Pupillometry: a survey of sources of variation. , 1975, Psychophysiology.

[33]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[34]  Mickaël Causse,et al.  Frequency analysis of a task-evoked pupillary response: Luminance-independent measure of mental effort. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[35]  J. Wilder,et al.  Modern psychophysiology and the law of initial value. , 1958, American journal of psychotherapy.

[36]  M. Bradley,et al.  Orienting and Emotional Perception: Facilitation, Attenuation, and Interference , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[37]  J. Rouder Optional stopping: No problem for Bayesians , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[39]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  The Pupillary Response in Cognitive Psychophysiology and Schizophrenia a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[40]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[41]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.

[42]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  The post-illumination pupil response is reduced in glaucoma patients. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  Megan H. Papesh,et al.  Pupillometry and Memory: External Signals of Metacognitive Control , 2015 .

[44]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[45]  Oleg V. Komogortsev,et al.  Body mass index moderates gaze orienting biases and pupil diameter to high and low calorie food images , 2011, Appetite.

[46]  B. Laeng,et al.  The Eye Pupil’s Response to Static and Dynamic Illusions of Luminosity and Darkness , 2017, i-Perception.

[47]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors , 2014, J. Probl. Solving.

[48]  Daniel Howes,et al.  The Use of Task-Evoked Pupillary Response as an Objective Measure of Cognitive Load in Novices and Trained Physicians: A New Tool for the Assessment of Expertise , 2015, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[49]  Vsevolod Peysakhovich,et al.  The impact of luminance on tonic and phasic pupillary responses to sustained cognitive load. , 2017, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[50]  Michael W. Weiss,et al.  Pupils dilate for vocal or familiar music. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[52]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[53]  H. Stanley Thompson,et al.  The Pupil. Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Applications, Vols. I and II , 1993 .

[54]  B. Moore Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[56]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Pupillary Stroop effects , 2010, Cognitive Processing.