Toward sustainable environment in Italy: The role of trade globalization, human capital, and renewable energy consumption

The current study evaluates the effect of financial development (FD), economic growth (GDP), trade globalization (TGLO), renewable energy consumption (REC), and human capital (HC) on ecological footprint (ECF) in Italy using data between 1985 and 2018. We further assess the combined impact of trade globalisation and human capital on ecological footprint as well as the combined effect of trade globalisation and human capital on ecological footprint. In order to explore these associations, the present research utilizes autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) to catch both long and short-run associations between ecological footprint and its drivers. Furthermore, we use dynamic OLS (DOLS) and fully modified OLS (FMOLS) long-run estimators as robustness checks. Lastly, causality at different frequencies is captured using the frequency domain causality test. The outcomes of the ARDL estimator disclose that (a) a surge in ecological footprint is attributed to an increase in economic growth; (b) a decrease in ecological footprint is attributed to an increase in renewable energy, trade globalisation, and human capital; (c) the combined impact of human capital and trade globalisation lessen ecological footprint, and (d) combined effect of trade globalisation and human capital mitigate ecological footprint in Italy. Furthermore, the outcomes of the causality test revealed that all the exogenous variables can significantly predict ecological footprint in the long run with the exemption of financial development. Based on the study's findings, an SDG-focused policy framework is advocated.

[1]  R. Alvarado,et al.  Do natural resources, economic growth, human capital, and urbanization affect the ecological footprint? A modified dynamic ARDL and KRLS approach , 2022, Resources Policy.

[2]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[3]  U. Pata,et al.  Do renewable and nuclear energy enhance environmental quality in France? A new EKC approach with the load capacity factor , 2022, Progress in Nuclear Energy.

[4]  M. Usman,et al.  Linking institutional quality to environmental sustainability , 2022, Sustainable Development.

[5]  E. B. Agyekum,et al.  Towards Sustainable Environment in G7 Nations: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption, Eco-innovation and Trade Openness , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[6]  Daniel Balsalobre-lorente,et al.  Towards Achieving Eco-Efficiency in Top 10 Polluted Countries: The Role of Green Technology and Natural Resource Rents , 2022, Gondwana Research.

[7]  Turgut Tursoy,et al.  Renewable energy, banking sector development, and carbon dioxide emissions nexus: A path toward sustainable development in South Africa , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[8]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  The Sustainable Environment in Uruguay: The Roles of Financial Development, Natural Resources, and Trade Globalization , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[9]  B. Saboori,et al.  Exploring the nexuses between nuclear energy, renewable energy, and carbon dioxide emissions: The role of economic complexity in the G7 countries , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[10]  M. Shahzad,et al.  Transition towards ecological sustainability through fiscal decentralization, renewable energy and green investment in OECD countries , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[11]  O. Adekoya,et al.  Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption – Ecological footprint nexus in net-oil exporting and net-oil importing countries: Policy implications for a sustainable environment , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[12]  Daniel Balsalobre-lorente,et al.  Structural emissions reduction of China's power and heating industry under the goal of "Double Carbon": A perspective from input-output analysis , 2022, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[13]  T. Adebayo,et al.  CO2 behavior amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy development , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[14]  Sudeshna Ghosh,et al.  How environmental taxes and carbon emissions are related in the G7 economies? , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[15]  M. Usman,et al.  Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: Can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load? , 2022, Energy Policy.

[16]  G. B. Amegavi,et al.  The dynamic relationship between economic globalisation, institutional quality, and ecological footprint: Evidence from Ghana , 2022, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development.

[17]  Muhammad Zubair Mumtaz,et al.  The dynamic nexus among financial development, renewable energy and carbon emissions: Moderating roles of globalization and institutional quality across BRI countries , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[18]  Ali Eren Alper,et al.  Testing the long-run impact of economic growth, energy consumption, and globalization on ecological footprint: new evidence from Fourier bootstrap ARDL and Fourier bootstrap Toda–Yamamoto test results , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[19]  Saima Sarwar,et al.  What causes environmental degradation in Pakistan? Embossing the role of fossil fuel energy consumption in the view of ecological footprint , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[20]  Adams Adeiza,et al.  Investigating the link between economic growth, financial development, urbanization, natural resources, human capital, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from Nigeria , 2022, Journal of Bioeconomics.

[21]  Derviş Kırıkkaleli,et al.  Empirical analysis of the relationship among urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprint: evidence from Eastern Europe , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[22]  Umer Shahzad,et al.  Investigating the spill overs and connectedness between financial globalization, high-tech industries and environmental footprints: Fresh evidence in context of China , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[23]  Sahar Afshan,et al.  The potency of eco-innovation, natural resource and financial development on ecological footprint: a quantile-ARDL-based evidence from China , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[24]  S. Kamel,et al.  The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: A quantile regression evidence , 2022, Energy Reports.

[25]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations , 2022, Resources Policy.

[26]  Derviş Kırıkkaleli,et al.  Load Capacity Factor and Financial Globalization in Brazil: The Role of Renewable Energy and Urbanization , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[27]  Daniel Balsalobre-lorente,et al.  A Step Towards Environmental Mitigation: How Do Economic Complexity And Natural Resources Matter? Focusing On Different Institutional Quality Level Countries , 2021, Resources Policy.

[28]  M. Ramzan,et al.  Does Globalization Moderate the Effect of Economic Complexity on CO2 Emissions? Evidence From the Top 10 Energy Transition Economies , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[29]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Effects of economic complexity, economic growth, and renewable energy technology budgets on ecological footprint: the role of democratic accountability , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[30]  A. Jahanger.  Impact of globalization on CO2 emissions based on EKC hypothesis in developing world: the moderating role of human capital , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[31]  N. Apergis,et al.  Investigating the role of globalization, and energy consumption for environmental externalities: Empirical evidence from developed and developing economies , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[32]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  The environmental Kuznets curve, based on the economic complexity, and the pollution haven hypothesis in PIIGS countries , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[33]  M. Ramzan,et al.  Determinants of carbon emissions in Argentina: The roles of renewable energy consumption and globalization , 2021 .

[34]  Munir Ahmad,et al.  Combined role of green productivity growth, economic globalization, and eco-innovation in achieving ecological sustainability for OECD economies. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  A. Alola,et al.  Examining the dynamics of ecological footprint in China with spectral Granger causality and quantile-on-quantile approaches , 2021, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.

[36]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development , 2021, Sustainable Development.

[37]  M. Usman,et al.  Pollution concern during globalization mode in financially resource-rich countries: Do financial development, natural resources, and renewable energy consumption matter? , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[38]  M. Usman,et al.  Do industrialization, economic growth and globalization processes influence the ecological footprint and healthcare expenditures? Fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for countries with the highest healthcare expenditures , 2021 .

[39]  G. Halkos,et al.  Influence of growth and urbanization on CO 2 emissions: The moderating effect of foreign direct investment on energy use in BRICS , 2021, Sustainable Development.

[40]  Avik Sinha,et al.  Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? , 2021, Gondwana Research.

[41]  Derviş Kırıkkaleli,et al.  The asymmetric effect of renewable energy and trade on consumption‐based CO2 emissions: The case of Italy , 2021, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[42]  Irfan Khan,et al.  Does energy trilemma a driver of economic growth? The roles of energy use, population growth, and financial development , 2021 .

[43]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: Does financial globalization matter? , 2021, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[44]  M. K. Anser,et al.  Striving towards environmental sustainability: how natural resources, human capital, financial development, and economic growth interact with ecological footprint in China , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[45]  Cosimo Magazzino,et al.  Revisiting the dynamic interactions between economic growth and environmental pollution in Italy: evidence from a gradient descent algorithm , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[46]  M. Usman,et al.  What determines environmental deficit in Asia? Embossing the role of renewable and non-renewable energy utilization , 2021 .

[47]  U. Pata.  Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective , 2021 .

[48]  I. Ozturk,et al.  The implications of renewable and non-renewable energy generating in Sub-Saharan Africa: The role of economic policy uncertainties , 2021 .

[49]  A. Ahmadpour,et al.  The effects of the renewable energies penetration on the surplus welfare under energy policy , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[50]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL , 2021 .

[51]  Kulvinder Purewal,et al.  Re-examining the effect of financial markets and institutions on economic growth: evidence from the OECD countries , 2021, Economic Change and Restructuring.

[52]  J. Gatsi,et al.  Financial development and economic growth nexus in SSA economies: The moderating role of telecommunication development , 2021, Cogent Economics & Finance.

[53]  Recep Ulucak,et al.  Relationship between energy consumption and environmental sustainability in OECD countries: The role of natural resources rents , 2020 .

[54]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[55]  O. Usman,et al.  The influence of renewable energy use, human capital, and trade on environmental quality in South Africa: multiple structural breaks cointegration approach , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[56]  A. Caglar,et al.  Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break , 2020 .

[57]  S. Nathaniel.  Biocapacity, human capital, and ecological footprint in G7 countries: the moderating role of urbanization and necessary lessons for emerging economies , 2020, Energy, Ecology and Environment.

[58]  Mohd Arshad Ansari,et al.  Do renewable energy and globalization enhance ecological footprint: an analysis of top renewable energy countries? , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[59]  Muhammad Umar,et al.  Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: How critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[60]  J. Inekwe,et al.  Human capital and CO2 emissions in the long run , 2020 .

[61]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: An empirical analysis , 2020 .

[62]  Kais Mtar,et al.  Causal Nexus Between Innovation, Financial Development, and Economic Growth: the Case of OECD Countries , 2020 .

[63]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States , 2019, Resources Policy.

[64]  S. Akadiri,et al.  Towards achieving environmental sustainability target in Italy. The role of energy, real income and globalization , 2019, Science of The Total Environment.

[65]  M. A. Baloch,et al.  The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[66]  U. Pata.  Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[67]  S. Sen,et al.  Opportunities, barriers and issues with renewable energy development – A discussion , 2017 .

[68]  Victor Moutinho,et al.  CO2 emissions, non-renewable and renewable electricity production, economic growth, and international trade in Italy , 2016 .

[69]  Paolo Mancuso,et al.  The contribution of physical and human capital accumulation to Italian regional growth: a nonparametric perspective , 2015 .

[70]  Cosimo Magazzino.  The relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Italy , 2016 .

[71]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies , 2010 .

[72]  Jörg Breitung,et al.  Testing for short- and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach , 2006 .

[73]  D. Andrews,et al.  Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis , 1992 .

[74]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.