Tutoring in problem-based learning medical curricula: the influence of tutor background and style on effectiveness

BackgroundEvidence for the superiority of particular characteristics in PBL tutors in medical curricula is generally inconclusive. Most studies have investigated the effectiveness of content experts compared with that of non-experts as measured either by student satisfaction or academic achievement. A few have compared academic staff tutors with student tutors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between students' perception of overall tutor effectiveness, particular tutor behaviours, clinical qualifications and academic appointment.MethodA questionnaire designed to evaluate particular aspects of PBL tutoring technique, related either to subject-matter knowledge or to process-facilitation skill, as well as overall effectiveness, was distributed to students in first year of a PBL medical program at the end of each of three tutor terms. A total of 76 tutor terms were included in the study. Data analysis compared clinical with non-clinical tutors, and staff with non-staff tutors.ResultsClinically qualified tutors used their subject-matter knowledge significantly more than non-clinical tutors and were seen as being more empathic with their students. Staff tutors placed more emphasis on assessment than non-staff tutors and were seen as having greater skill in establishing and maintaining an environment of cooperation within their PBL groups than non-staff tutors.ConclusionThese results suggest that both subject-matter knowledge and process-facilitation skills are necessary but not individually sufficient characteristics of effective tutors.

[1]  K. Engle.  Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education , 1981 .

[2]  J. Moust,et al.  Peer teaching and higher level cognitive learning outcomes in problem-based learning , 1989 .

[3]  A. Gilkison,et al.  Techniques used by ‘expert’ and ‘non‐expert’ tutors to facilitate problem‐based learning tutorials in an undergraduate medical curriculum , 2003, Medical education.

[4]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Influence of tutors' subject‐matter expertise on student effort and achievement in problem‐based learning , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  H. Schmidt,et al.  What makes a tutor effective? A structural‐equations modeling approach to learning in problem‐based curricula , 1995, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  G. Maudsley,et al.  Roles and responsibilities of the problem based learning tutor in the undergraduate medical curriculum , 1999, BMJ.

[7]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Facilitating small-group learning: A comparison of student and staff tutors' behavior , 1994 .

[8]  M. Paine,et al.  Effects of expert and non‐expert facilitators on the small‐group process and on student performance , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  Wim H. Gijselaers,et al.  Peer teaching and problem-based learning: tutor characteristics, tutor functioning, group functioning and student achievement , 1990 .

[10]  Stanley G. Korenman,et al.  Innovation in Medical Education: An Evaluation of Its Present Status , 1991 .

[11]  J. Gordon,et al.  Student evaluation of expert and non-expert problem-based learning tutors , 2002, Medical teacher.

[12]  Sonja van Holland.  Facilitating small-group learning: a comparison of student and staff tutors' behavior , 2004 .

[13]  D. T. Vernon,et al.  Does problem‐based learning work? A meta‐analysis of evaluative research , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[14]  C. Vleuten,et al.  Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research , 2002, Medical teacher.