Personalised parliamentary behaviour without electoral incentives: the case of the Netherlands

Abstract Most theories of legislative behaviour explain the behaviour of MPs through electoral incentives. However, they fail to explain variation in parliamentary activity when individual electoral incentives are largely absent. This article studies MPs’ activity in such a parliament: the Dutch Tweede Kamer. It examines four clusters of incentives that may drive parliamentarians to be active. Party and committee environments provide the best explanation for the level of activity of individual MPs. Reselection and promotion prospects explain MPs’ behaviour, but only under more particular specifications. Re-election prospects were not found to affect activity levels.

[1]  David R. Mayhew.  Congress: The Electoral Connection , 1975 .

[2]  Thomas Bräuninger,et al.  Personal vote‐seeking in flexible list systems: How electoral incentives shape Belgian MPs' bill initiation behaviour , 2012 .

[3]  Keith Krehbiel,et al.  Dynamics of Cosponsorship , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[4]  James E. Campbell.  Cosponsoring Legislation in the U. S. Congress , 1982 .

[5]  Reuven Y. Hazan,et al.  Democracy within Parties , 2010 .

[6]  K. Shepsle.  Rational Choice Institutionalism , 2008 .

[7]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Measuring party positions in Europe , 2015 .

[8]  H. Clarke,et al.  Freshman MPs' Job Images: The Effects of Incumbency, Ambition and Position , 1980, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[9]  Sue Thomas.  How Women Legislate , 1994 .

[10]  Ulrich Sieberer.  Behavioral consequences of mixed electoral systems: Deviating voting behavior of district and list MPs in the German Bundestag , 2010 .

[11]  Edward Crowe.  The Web of Authority: Party Loyalty and Social Control in the British House of Commons , 1986 .

[12]  O. Rozenberg,et al.  Bringing Parliamentary Roles Back In , 2012 .

[13]  Gregory Koger,et al.  Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House , 2003 .

[14]  W. Müller.  Political parties in parliamentary democracies: Making delegation and accountability work , 2000 .

[15]  Shane Martin.  Why electoral systems don’t always matter , 2014 .

[16]  Noah J. Kaplan,et al.  Comparing Cosponsorship and Roll-Call Ideal Points , 2009 .

[17]  Keith Krehbiel,et al.  Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z , 1995 .

[18]  Stefanie Bailer,et al.  People's Voice or Information Pool? The Role of, and Reasons for, Parliamentary Questions in the Swiss Parliament , 2011 .

[19]  Reuven Y. Hazan,et al.  Candidate Selection Methods , 2001 .

[20]  R. Andeweg,et al.  Pathways to party unity: Sanctions, loyalty, homogeneity and division of labour in the Dutch parliament , 2011 .

[21]  Yael Shomer.  Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-Seeking Behavior , 2009 .

[22]  C. M. V. Vonno.  Role-Switching in the Dutch Parliament: Reinvigorating Role Theory? , 2012 .

[23]  Gary King,et al.  Toward a Common Framework for Statistical Analysis and Development , 2008 .

[24]  Kaare W. Strøm.  Rules, reasons and routines: Legislative roles in parliamentary democracies , 1997 .

[25]  A. Hirschman.  THE PATERNITY OF AN INDEX , 1964 .

[26]  Tom Louwerse,et al.  The Impact of Parliamentary Specialisation on Cosponsorship , 2015 .

[27]  Kelly Blidook,et al.  Constituency Influence on ‘Constituency Members’: The Adaptability of Roles to Electoral Realities in the Canadian Case , 2011 .

[28]  Anika Gauja.  Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences , 2012 .

[29]  Christophe Schinckus,et al.  Toward a Common Framework , 2017 .

[30]  Reuven Y. Hazan,et al.  Electoral Systems and Candidate Selection , 2006 .

[31]  G. Huber,et al.  The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior , 2007 .

[32]  Jonathan B. Slapin,et al.  Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech , 2012 .

[33]  Sam Depauw,et al.  Legislative party discipline and cohesion in comparative perspective , 2005 .

[34]  S. Bowler.  Private Members' Bills in the UK Parliament: Is There an ‘Electoral Connection’? , 2010 .

[35]  Herbert B. Asher.  The Learning of Legislative Norms , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[36]  Eric B. Edwards,et al.  Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning , 2010 .