Measuring location in residential location choice: An empirical study on the canton of Zurich

In transportation and land-use research, discrete choice models have become a common method for assessing the value or utility of discrete alternatives for an individual choice-maker and have led to the simulation of land-use developments on a microscopic level. Discrete location choice models represent relocation behavior in those simulations and generally implement three groups of variables, representing attributes of the alternative, the decision-taker and the location. With the growing availability of spatial data on a disaggregated level, a large number of location variables have been reported in these models, which reduces their comparability and their transferability to other study areas. To address this limitation, Schirmer et al. (2012) classified location variables and proposed a common set of attributes as an initial setup. In this paper, we explore the impact of these attributes on residential location choice in the Canton of Zurich.

[1]  André de Palma,et al.  A model of residential location choice with endogenous housing prices and traffic for the Paris region , 2005 .

[2]  Paul Waddell,et al.  Residential mobility and location choice: a nested logit model with sampling of alternatives , 2010 .

[3]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Modeling the choice continuum: an integrated model of residential location, auto ownership, bicycle ownership, and commute tour mode choice decisions , 2011 .

[4]  Patrick Schirmer Location choice in the greater Zurich Area: An intermediate report , 2011 .

[5]  David Simmonds,et al.  Residential Location Choice - Models and Applications , 2010 .

[6]  Paul Waddell,et al.  Reexamining the Influence of Work and Nonwork Accessibility on Residential Location Choices with a Microanalytic Framework , 2010 .

[7]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Accessibility Trade-Offs in Household Residential Location Decisions , 2008 .

[8]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Tradeoffs in residential location decisions: Transportation versus other factors , 1980 .

[9]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  The Zurich Case Study of UrbanSim , 2011 .

[10]  André de Palma,et al.  Discrete choice models with capacity constraints: an empirical analysis of the housing market of the greater Paris region , 2007 .

[11]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Reviewing measurements in residential location choice models , 2012 .

[12]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  The validity of hierarchical information integration choice experiments to model residential preference and choice , 2010 .

[13]  Benjamin C. Belart Wohnstandortwahl im Grossraum Zürich , 2011 .

[14]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Reference-Dependent Residential Location Choice Model within a Relocation Context , 2009 .

[15]  A. Anas Residential location markets and urban transportation : economic theory, econometrics, and policy analysis with discrete choice models , 1982 .

[16]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[17]  Jae Hong Kim,et al.  The Intention to Move and Residential Location Choice Behaviour , 2005 .

[18]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Operationalizing the Concept of Neighborhood: Application to Residential Location Choice Analysis , 2007 .

[19]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Locations, Commitments and Activity Spaces , 2004 .

[20]  Marits Pieters,et al.  Influence of Accessibility on Residential Location Choice , 2005 .

[21]  Jessica Y. Guo,et al.  Addressing spatial complexities in residential location choice models , 2004 .

[22]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Understanding Residential Mobility , 2009 .

[23]  W. G. Hansen How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[24]  P. Waddell,et al.  Analysis of Lifestyle Choices: Neighborhood Type, Travel Patterns, and Activity Participation , 2002 .

[25]  Jonas Eliasson,et al.  The Influence of Accessibility on Residential Location , 2010 .

[26]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Learning, Innovation and Growth Within Interconected Clusters: An Agent-Based Approach , 2009 .