Semi-non-intrusive objective intelligibility measure using spatial filtering in hearing aids

Reliable non-intrusive online assessment of speech intelligibility can play a key role for the functioning of hearing aids, e.g. as guidance for adjusting the hearing aid settings to the environment. While existing intrusive metrics can provide a precise and reliable measure, the current non-intrusive metrics have not been able to achieve acceptable intelligibility predictions. This paper presents a new semi-non-intrusive intelligibility measure based on an existing intrusive measure, STOI, where an estimate of the clean speech is extracted using spatial filtering in the hearing aid. The results indicate that the STOI score obtained with the proposed method using an estimate of the clean speech correlates well with the STOI score having the original clean speech signal available.

[1]  James M. Kates,et al.  Objective Quality and Intelligibility Prediction for Users of Assistive Listening Devices: Advantages and limitations of existing tools , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  Jesper Jensen,et al.  An Algorithm for Intelligibility Prediction of Time–Frequency Weighted Noisy Speech , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[3]  S. Nordholm,et al.  Adaptive beamforming: Spatial filter designed blocking matrix , 1994 .

[4]  Wail Gueaieb,et al.  Adaptive environment classification system for hearing aids. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Robustness analysis of multichannel Wiener filtering and generalized sidelobe cancellation for multimicrophone noise reduction in hearing aid applications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing.

[6]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Performance measurement in blind audio source separation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[7]  Dafydd Gibbon,et al.  EUROM - a spoken language resource for the EU - the SAM projects , 1995, EUROSPEECH.

[8]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Predicting the intelligibility of reverberant speech for cochlear implant listeners with a non-intrusive intelligibility measure , 2013, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[9]  B C Moore,et al.  Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Speech Understanding in Background Noise with the Two-Microphone Adaptive Beamformer BEAM™ in the Nucleus Freedom™ Cochlear Implant System , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[11]  James M. Kates,et al.  The Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI) , 2014, Speech Commun..

[12]  Andries P. Hekstra,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221).

[13]  L. J. Griffiths,et al.  An alternative approach to linearly constrained adaptive beamforming , 1982 .

[14]  24th European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO 2016, Budapest, Hungary, August 29 - September 2, 2016 , 2016, European Signal Processing Conference.

[15]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Raymond L. Goldsworthy,et al.  Analysis of speech-based Speech Transmission Index methods with implications for nonlinear operations. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Henning Puder,et al.  Signal Processing in High-End Hearing Aids: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Trends , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[18]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids: without is better than with. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Tiago H. Falk,et al.  A Non-Intrusive Quality and Intelligibility Measure of Reverberant and Dereverberated Speech , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.