Auxiliary Reflectance Sensor for Guided Surgery with Dental Implants: In Vitro Study

Objectives  The aim of this research was to develop a sensor of approximation by reflectance for guided surgery with dental implants without flap detachment, and verify the effectiveness of this system. Materials and Methods  Ten models of total edentulous arches were divided into two groups. Two implants of 3.5 × 11.5 mm (NeoDent) were inserted in each model; in Group 1 (G1), a stereolithographic guide NeoGuide system was used. In Group 2 (G2), the experimental approximation sensor was used for the insertion of the implants. The evaluation of the results was performed by overlapping the virtual planning images with the tomographies of the models of the implants inserted. Results  There were no statistically significant differences between the guide and the sensor groups. The averages and standard deviations observed at the angulation of the guide was 4.15 (2.65 degrees) and 5.48 (2.85 degrees) at the sensor. The linear deviations at the cervical level were 0.002 (1.37) and 0.11 (1.47) mm and at the apical level 0.19 (1.28) and 0.21 (1.42) mm, respectively. Conclusions  The use of a guide is important for the stabilization of the drills; the greatest challenge is to control the apical position of the implants, especially in highly reabsorbed edges. The experimental sensor can become an auxiliary tool to the stereolithographic guides; however, several difficulties must still be overcome to recommend the use of a sensor.

[1]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  Computer-enhanced stereoscopic vision in a head-mounted display for oral implant surgery. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  Daniel Amaral Alves Marlière,et al.  Accuracy of computer-guided surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A systematic review , 2018, European Journal of Dentistry.

[3]  Gintaras Juodzbalys,et al.  Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review , 2018, Journal of oral & maxillofacial research.

[4]  M. Esposito,et al.  Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. , 2014, European journal of oral implantology.

[5]  Patricia R Cury,et al.  Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[6]  Sang-Hoon Kang,et al.  Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: in vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method. , 2014, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[7]  A. Voulgarakis,et al.  Outcomes of implants placed with three different flapless surgical procedures: a systematic review. , 2014, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Depth and lateral deviations in guided implant surgery: an RCT comparing guided surgery with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  Nadine Brodala,et al.  Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  Ignace Naert,et al.  Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy. , 2014, Periodontology 2000.

[11]  J. D'haese,et al.  A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[12]  Zhonghao Liu,et al.  CLINICAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE ACCURACY OF GUIDED IMPLANT SURGERY—A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS , 2017, The journal of evidence-based dental practice.

[13]  Robert W Emery,et al.  Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. , 2016, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[14]  Volkan Arısan,et al.  Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. , 2010, Journal of periodontology.

[15]  D. Tatakis,et al.  Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. , 2019, Periodontology 2000.

[16]  T. van de Velde,et al.  A model study on flapless implant placement by clinicians with a different experience level in implant surgery. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  L. Sennerby,et al.  Immediate loading of maxillary prostheses using flapless surgery, implant placement in predetermined positions, and prefabricated provisional restorations. Part 2: a retrospective 10-year clinical study. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  N. Sesma,et al.  Linear and angular deviations of implants placed in experimental casts with stereolithographic drill guides fixed by o'ring ortho implant devices. , 2013, Brazilian dental journal.