Wherever I may roam—Human activity alters movements of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and elk (Cervus canadensis) across two continents

Human activity and associated landscape modifications alter the movements of animals with consequences for populations and ecosystems worldwide. Species performing long-distance movements are thought to be particularly sensitive to human impact. Despite the increasing anthropogenic pressure, it remains challenging to understand and predict animals' responses to human activity. Here we address this knowledge gap using 1206 Global Positioning System movement trajectories of 815 individuals from 14 red deer (Cervus elaphus) and 14 elk (Cervus canadensis) populations spanning wide environmental gradients, namely the latitudinal range from the Alps to Scandinavia in Europe, and the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in North America. We measured individual-level movements relative to the environmental context, or movement expression, using the standardized metric Intensity of Use, reflecting both the directionality and extent of movements. We expected movement expression to be affected by resource (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, NDVI) predictability and topography, but those factors to be superseded by human impact. Red deer and elk movement expression varied along a continuum, from highly segmented trajectories over relatively small areas (high intensity of use), to directed transitions through restricted corridors (low intensity of use). Human activity (Human Footprint Index, HFI) was the strongest driver of movement expression, with a steep increase in Intensity of Use as HFI increased, but only until a threshold was reached. After exceeding this level of impact, the Intensity of Use remained unchanged. These results indicate the overall sensitivity of Cervus movement expression to human activity and suggest a limitation of plastic responses under high human pressure, despite the species also occurring in human-dominated landscapes. Our work represents the first comparison of metric-based movement expression across widely distributed populations of a deer genus, contributing to the understanding and prediction of animals' responses to human activity.

[1]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Data Management and Sharing for Collaborative Science: Lessons Learnt From the Euromammals Initiative , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[2]  Mark A. Hurley,et al.  Mapping out a future for ungulate migrations , 2021, Science.

[3]  T. Mueller,et al.  The plasticity of ungulate migration in a changing world. , 2021, Ecology.

[4]  F. Rovero,et al.  Effects of cumulated outdoor activity on wildlife habitat use , 2020, Biological Conservation.

[5]  J. Brashares,et al.  Fence Ecology: Frameworks for Understanding the Ecological Effects of Fences , 2020, BioScience.

[6]  Mark A. Hurley,et al.  Wave-like Patterns of Plant Phenology Determine Ungulate Movement Tactics , 2020, Current Biology.

[7]  Robert A. Davis,et al.  Human impact overrides bioclimatic drivers of red fox home range size globally , 2020, Diversity and Distributions.

[8]  Nathan Ranc,et al.  Experimental evidence of memory-based foraging decisions in a large wild mammal , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  N. Horning,et al.  Variability in nomadism: environmental gradients modulate the movement behaviors of dryland ungulates , 2019, Ecosphere.

[10]  Eric K. Cole,et al.  Plasticity in elk migration timing is a response to changing environmental conditions , 2019, Global change biology.

[11]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Large herbivore migration plasticity along environmental gradients in Europe: life-history traits modulate forage effects , 2018, Oikos.

[12]  Michael S. Mitchell,et al.  Land management alters traditional nutritional benefits of migration for elk , 2018, The Journal of Wildlife Management.

[13]  Mark A. Hurley,et al.  Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals , 2018, Science.

[14]  John Fieberg,et al.  Animal movement tools (amt): R package for managing tracking data and conducting habitat selection analyses , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[15]  Shannon E. Albeke,et al.  Evaluating the influence of energy and residential development on the migratory behavior of mule deer , 2018 .

[16]  Susanne A. Fritz,et al.  Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements , 2018, Science.

[17]  R. Nielson,et al.  Mule deer and energy development—Long‐term trends of habituation and abundance , 2017, Global change biology.

[18]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Migration in geographic and ecological space by a large herbivore , 2017 .

[19]  Kendall R. Jones,et al.  Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009 , 2016, Scientific Data.

[20]  Ellen O. Aikens,et al.  Large herbivores surf waves of green-up during spring , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  L. Boitani,et al.  Border Security Fencing and Wildlife: The End of the Transboundary Paradigm in Eurasia? , 2016, PLoS biology.

[22]  J. Calabrese,et al.  How far to go? Determinants of migration distance in land mammals. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[23]  O. Liberg,et al.  Behavioral responses of wolves to roads: scale-dependent ambivalence , 2014, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[24]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[25]  S. Bauer,et al.  Migratory Animals Couple Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning Worldwide , 2014, Science.

[26]  P. Lejeune,et al.  Spatio-temporal patterns of wildlife-vehicle collisions in a region with a high-density road network , 2013 .

[27]  Bram Van Moorter,et al.  A road in the middle of one of the last wild reindeer migration routes in Norway: crossing behaviour and threats to conservation , 2013 .

[28]  M. Shinoda,et al.  Fragmentation of the Habitat of Wild Ungulates by Anthropogenic Barriers in Mongolia , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Clement Atzberger,et al.  Data service platform for MODIS Vegetation Indices time series processing at BOKU Vienna: current status and future perspectives , 2012, Remote Sensing.

[30]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  A Migratory Northern Ungulate in the Pursuit of Spring: Jumping or Surfing the Green Wave? , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[31]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Reassessing the Determinants of Breeding Synchrony in Ungulates , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Craig Nicolson,et al.  Annual movements of Mongolian gazelles: Nomads in the Eastern Steppe , 2010 .

[33]  R. Alkemade,et al.  The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta-analysis. , 2010 .

[34]  J. Berger,et al.  Global decline in aggregated migrations of large terrestrial mammals , 2009 .

[35]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  J. Berger Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas , 2007, Biology Letters.

[37]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[38]  J. P. Ball,et al.  Partial migration by large ungulates: characteristics of seasonal moose Alces alces ranges in northern Sweden , 2001, Wildlife Biology.

[39]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  PREDICTABILITY, CONSTANCY, AND CONTINGENCY OF PERIODIC PHENOMENA' , 1974 .

[40]  C. Wilmers,et al.  Human presence and human footprint have non-equivalent effects on wildlife spatiotemporal habitat use , 2020 .

[41]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Plastic response by a small cervid to supplemental feeding in winter across a wide environmental gradient , 2017 .

[42]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Red deer habitat selection and movements in relation to roads , 2013 .