Temporal aggregation impacts on epidemiological simulations employing microcontact data

BackgroundMicrocontact datasets gathered automatically by electronic devices have the potential augment the study of the spread of contagious disease by providing detailed representations of the study population’s contact dynamics. However, the impact of data collection experimental design on the subsequent simulation studies has not been adequately addressed. In particular, the impact of study duration and contact dynamics data aggregation on the ultimate outcome of epidemiological models has not been studied in detail, leaving the potential for erroneous conclusions to be made based on simulation outcomes.MethodsWe employ a previously published data set covering 36 participants for 92 days and a previously published agent-based H1N1 infection model to analyze the impact of contact dynamics representation on the simulated outcome of H1N1 transmission. We compared simulated attack rates resulting from the empirically recorded contact dynamics (ground truth), aggregated, typical day, and artificially generated synthetic networks.ResultsNo aggregation or sampling policy tested was able to reliably reproduce results from the ground-truth full dynamic network. For the population under study, typical day experimental designs – which extrapolate from data collected over a brief period – exhibited too high a variance to produce consistent results. Aggregated data representations systematically overestimated disease burden, and synthetic networks only reproduced the ground truth case when fitting errors systemically underestimated the total contact, compensating for the systemic overestimation from aggregation.ConclusionsThe interdepedendencies of contact dynamics and disease transmission require that detailed contact dynamics data be employed to secure high fidelity in simulation outcomes of disease burden in at least some populations. This finding serves as motivation for larger, longer and more socially diverse contact dynamics tracing experiments and as a caution to researchers employing calibrated aggregate synthetic representations of contact dynamics in simulation, as the calibration may underestimate disease parameters to compensate for the overestimation of disease burden imposed by the aggregate contact network representation.

[1]  A. Barrat,et al.  Simulation of an SEIR infectious disease model on the dynamic contact network of conference attendees , 2011, BMC medicine.

[2]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Reality mining: sensing complex social systems , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[3]  J. M. Riese,et al.  Semi-empirical power-law scaling of new infection rate to model epidemic dynamics with inhomogeneous mixing. , 2006, Mathematical biosciences.

[4]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Newman.  Spread of epidemic disease on networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Kevin G. Stanley,et al.  Leveraging H1N1 infection transmission modeling with proximity sensor microdata , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[7]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[8]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[9]  G. Huse.  Individual‐based Modeling and Ecology , 2008 .

[10]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[11]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Graph-Coupled HMMs for Modeling the Spread of Infection , 2012, UAI.

[12]  W. Edmunds,et al.  Dynamic social networks and the implications for the spread of infectious disease , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[13]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[14]  Robert M May,et al.  Network structure and the biology of populations. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Kevin G. Stanley,et al.  Human network data collection in the wild: the epidemiological utility of micro-contact and location data , 2012, IHI '12.

[16]  K. Desanto,et al.  Public Health Agency of Canada , 2011 .

[17]  Hazhir Rahmandad,et al.  Heterogeneity and Network Structure in the Dynamics of Diffusion: Comparing Agent-Based and Differential Equation Models , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Philip Levis,et al.  Experiences in measuring a human contact network for epidemiology research , 2010, HotEmNets.

[19]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  Injong Rhee,et al.  On the levy-walk nature of human mobility , 2011, TNET.

[21]  Kevin G. Stanley,et al.  Flunet: Automated tracking of contacts during flu season , 2010, 8th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks.

[22]  Alex Pentland,et al.  How Many Makes a Crowd? On the Evolution of Learning as a Factor of Community Coverage , 2012, SBP.

[23]  David Kotz,et al.  Analysis of a Campus-Wide Wireless Network , 2002, MobiCom '02.

[24]  Sun-Ki Chai,et al.  Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[25]  M. Keeling.  The implications of network structure for epidemic dynamics. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.

[26]  Geoffrey M. Voelker,et al.  Access and mobility of wireless PDA users , 2003, MOCO.

[27]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Power Law and Exponential Decay of Intercontact Times between Mobile Devices , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[28]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility , 2010, Science.

[29]  P. Blair,et al.  Evaluation of an influenza-like illness case definition in the diagnosis of influenza among patients with acute febrile illness in cambodia , 2010, BMC infectious diseases.

[30]  Matteo Chinazzi,et al.  Little Italy: An Agent-Based Approach to the Estimation of Contact Patterns- Fitting Predicted Matrices to Serological Data , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  David Buckeridge,et al.  Estimated epidemiologic parameters and morbidity associated with pandemic H1N1 influenza , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[32]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Modeling Infection with Multi-agent Dynamics , 2012, SBP.

[33]  M. Keeling,et al.  Networks and epidemic models , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[34]  David Lazer,et al.  Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  What's in a crowd? Analysis of face-to-face behavioral networks , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Social Dynamics in Conferences: Analyses of Data from the Live Social Semantics Application , 2010, SEMWEB.

[37]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  High-Resolution Measurements of Face-to-Face Contact Patterns in a Primary School , 2011, PloS one.

[38]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Business dynamics : systems thinking and modelling for acomplex world , 2002 .

[39]  Matt J Keeling,et al.  Contact tracing and disease control , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Maria A. Kazandjieva,et al.  A high-resolution human contact network for infectious disease transmission , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.