Selecting and Retaining Friends on the Basis of Cigarette Smoking Similarity

This study examines whether friend selection, deselection, and socialization differ as a function of the level of cigarette smoking in the friendship group. A total of 1419 students (median age = 16) from upper secondary and vocational schools in Finland were included as targets in the peer network. Targets in the peer network were asked to nominate friends and describe their own cigarette smoking at two time points one year apart. Network analyses revealed similarity arising from selection and deselection on the basis of smoking. Selection effects (i.e., selecting new friends based on similarity) were stronger for adolescents in low-smoking groups. Deselection effects (i.e., dropping friends based on dissimilarity) were stronger for adolescents in high-smoking groups.

[1]  Penelope Eckert,et al.  Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School , 1989 .

[2]  K. Salmela‐Aro,et al.  Opposites detract: middle school peer group antipathies. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  A. Rimpelä,et al.  Health related lifestyle in adolescence predicts adult educational level: a longitudinal study from Finland. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[4]  B. Laursen,et al.  Friend influence over adolescent problem behaviors as a function of relative peer acceptance: to be liked is to be emulated. , 2012, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  René Veenstra,et al.  Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics , 2012 .

[6]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Age differences in resistance to peer influence. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The statistical analysis of data from small groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Jere M. Cohen.  Sources of peer group homogeneity. , 1977 .

[9]  H. Juon,et al.  A longitudinal study of developmental trajectories to young adult cigarette smoking. , 2002, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[10]  Ruth M. Ripley,et al.  Manual for RSiena , 2011 .

[11]  S. Değirmencioğlu,et al.  Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[12]  J. Cotterell.  Social Networks in Youth and Adolescence , 2007 .

[13]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Manual for SIENA version 2.1 , 2005 .

[14]  R. Little.  A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values , 1988 .

[15]  Bruce G. Simons-Morton,et al.  Recent Findings on Peer Group Influences on Adolescent Smoking , 2010, The Journal of Primary Prevention.

[16]  C. Steglich,et al.  DYNAMIC NETWORKS AND BEHAVIOR: SEPARATING SELECTION FROM INFLUENCE: separating selection from influence , 2010 .

[17]  Katariina Salmela-Aro,et al.  Peer Group Influence and Selection in Adolescents' School Burnout: A Longitudinal Study , 2008 .

[18]  E. Oetting,et al.  Peer cluster theory, socialization characteristics, and adolescent drug use: A path analysis. , 1987 .

[19]  M. Kerr,et al.  Homophily in stable and unstable adolescent friendships: Similarity breeds constancy , 2011 .

[20]  Mark Huisman,et al.  Treatment of non-response in longitudinal network studies , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[21]  M. Prinstein,et al.  Adolescent peer crowd affiliation: linkages with health-risk behaviors and close friendships. , 2001, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[22]  Kaisa Aunola,et al.  The Role of Peer Groups in Adolescents’ Educational Expectations and Adjustment , 2007 .

[23]  Hein de Vries,et al.  Social influence and selection effects in the context of smoking behavior: changes during early and mid adolescence. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[24]  Todd D. Little,et al.  Handbook of developmental research methods , 2012 .

[25]  T. Moffitt.  Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. , 1993, Psychological review.

[26]  Christian Steglich,et al.  A longitudinal social network analysis of peer influence, peer selection, and smoking behavior among adolescents in British schools. , 2012, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[27]  W. Hartup.  The company they keep: friendships and their developmental significance. , 1996, Child development.

[28]  Karl E. Bauman,et al.  The Peer Context of Adolescent Substance Use: Findings from Social Network Analysis , 2006 .

[29]  René Veenstra,et al.  Transformations in adolescent peer networks , 2011 .

[30]  J. Rogers.  Children and Teens , 2011 .

[31]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[32]  H. Hops,et al.  The influence of peers on young adult substance use. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[33]  Jeroen Bruggeman,et al.  The social network, socioeconomic background, and school type of adolescent smokers , 2012 .

[34]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Smoking patterns and dependence: contrasting chippers and heavy smokers. , 2006, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[35]  W. Andrew Collins,et al.  Parent—Child Relationships During Adolescence , 2009 .

[36]  Michael Michell.  Smoke Rings: social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking , 2000 .

[37]  J. Moody,et al.  DELINQUENCY AND THE STRUCTURE OF ADOLESCENT PEER GROUPS. , 2011, Criminology : an interdisciplinary journal.

[38]  Katariina Salmela-Aro,et al.  Pressure to drink but not to smoke: disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. , 2010, Journal of adolescence.

[39]  C. Agnew,et al.  Similarity in cigarette smoking attracts: a prospective study of romantic partner selection by own smoking and smoker prototypes. , 2009, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[40]  K. Bauman,et al.  The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: the case of adolescent cigarette smoking. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  W. Burk,et al.  Mother and Adolescent Reports of Associations Between Child Behavior Problems and Mother-Child Relationship Qualities: Separating Shared Variance from Individual Variance , 2010, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[42]  T. Snijders,et al.  A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution , 2003 .

[43]  K. Dodge,et al.  Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. , 1982 .