Topicalization in German particle verb constructions : The role of semantic transparency

In this paper, we investigate topicalization patterns of German particle verbs by comparing the syntactic behavior of semantically transparent and non-transparent particle verb constructions. We propose a classification that allows us to cover the whole transparency spectrum and to distinguish between fully transparent and fully non-transparent particle verbs. Given this classification, we report on a questionnaire study that provides empirical evidence for the claim that information structural constraints in combination with the degree of semantic transparency govern topicalization patterns in particle verb configurations. We conclude by pointing out potential additional constraints on topicalization in particle verb constructions that go beyond information structure.

[1]  Jesse Snedeker,et al.  It takes two to kiss, but does it take three to give a kiss? Categorization based on thematic roles , 2014 .

[2]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Verb-Particle Explorations , 2002 .

[3]  Agnieszka E. Konopka,et al.  Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Sit down and read on: Working memory and long-term memory in particle-verb processing , 2013, Brain and Language.

[5]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Measuring Grammatical Complexity , 2014 .

[6]  Julia Horvath,et al.  “Discourse features”, syntactic displacement and the status of contrast , 2010 .

[7]  Andrew McIntyre,et al.  German double particles as preverbs : morphology and conceptual semantics , 2001 .

[8]  Gisela Zifonun,et al.  Sprachkorpora - Datenmengen und Erkenntnisfortschritt , 2007 .

[9]  Joachim Jacobs,et al.  Focus Ambiguities , 1991, J. Semant..

[10]  Eva Wittenberg,et al.  If you want a quick kiss, make it count: How choice of syntactic construction affects event construal , 2017, Journal of memory and language.

[11]  J. Bayer,et al.  The derivation and interpretation of left peripheral discourse particles , 2015 .

[12]  Barbara John A Thomas Lohse,et al.  Domain Minimization in English Verb-Particle Constructions , 2004 .

[13]  Stefan Müller.  Complex Predicates: Verbal Complexes, Resultative Constructions, and Particle Verbs in German , 2002 .

[14]  Andreas Trotzke,et al.  The complexity of narrow syntax : Minimalism, representational economy, and simplest Merge , 2014 .

[15]  Gert Webelhuth,et al.  A Lexical-Functional Analysis of Predicate Topicalization in German , 1999, American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures.

[16]  A. Reboul.  Mind, Values, and Metaphysics , 2014 .

[17]  Erlangung der Doktorwürde.  RETHINKING SYNTACTOCENTRISM LESSONS FROM RECENT GENERATIVE APPROACHES TO PRAGMATIC PROPERTIES OF LEFT-PERIPHERY-MOVEMENT IN GERMAN , 2010 .

[18]  Angelika Wöllstein,et al.  Event arguments : foundations and applications , 2005 .

[19]  Jochen Zeller,et al.  Particle verbs and local domains , 2001 .

[20]  Andreas Trotzke,et al.  The grammatical reflexes of emphasis: evidence from German wh-questions , 2015 .

[21]  Stefan Müller,et al.  Qualitative Korpusanalyse für die Grammatiktheorie: Introspektion vs. Korpus , 2007 .

[22]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[23]  Nanna Fuhrhop.  Zwischen Wort und Syntagma : zur grammatischen Fundierung der Getrennt- und Zusammenschreibung , 2007 .

[24]  Charles N. Li.  Word order and word order change , 1975 .

[25]  Stefan Müller,et al.  Syntax or morphology: German particle verbs revisited , 2002 .

[26]  Gisela Zifonun,et al.  Grammatik der deutschen Sprache , 1997 .

[27]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Syntactic Cartography and the Syntacticisation of Scope-Discourse Semantics , 2014 .

[28]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax , 2002 .

[29]  Anke Lüdeling,et al.  On Particle Verbs and Similar Constructions in German , 2001 .

[30]  P. Eisenberg.  Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik , 2006 .

[31]  Andrew Mclntyre,et al.  Idiosyncrasy in particle verbs , 2002 .

[32]  Ping Chen,et al.  Discourse and Particle Movement in English , 1986 .

[33]  Susan Olsen,et al.  Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe , 2015 .

[34]  Carsten Eulitz,et al.  'Verstehen ' ('understand') primes ' stehen ' ('stand'): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs , 2014 .

[35]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Context-dependent Semantic Processing in the Human Brain: Evidence from Idiom Comprehension , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Nicole Dehé.  Particle verbs in Germanic , 2015 .

[37]  James Myers,et al.  Syntactic Judgment Experiments , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[38]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates , 2005 .

[39]  Martin Paczynski,et al.  The difference between "giving a rose" and "giving a kiss": Sustained neural activity to the light verb construction. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[40]  Joachim Jacobs,et al.  Quer zu den Feldern: zur Topologie von Partikelverben , 2010 .

[41]  W. Detmar Meurers,et al.  42. Corpora and syntax , 2009 .

[42]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[43]  Sophie Repp,et al.  Defining ‘contrast’ as an information-structural notion in grammar , 2010 .

[44]  DIETER WUNDERLICH,et al.  Morphology feeds syntax: the case of particle verbs , 1994 .

[45]  Andreas Trotzke,et al.  Discourse-oriented Syntax , 2015 .

[46]  Patrick Caudal,et al.  Types of degrees and types of event structures , 2005 .

[47]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[48]  Susi Wurmbrand,et al.  THE STRUCTURE(S) OF PARTICLE VERBS , 2000 .

[49]  Peter Eisenberg,et al.  Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Band 2: Der Satz. Stuttgart: Metzler 1999. XII + 551 S. , 2000 .