The additional value of three time point color coding in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast for inexperienced and experienced readers.

PURPOSE To evaluate the additional value of the color coding of dynamic data using the 3TP method in the evaluation of contrast-enhanced breast MRI for readers with different levels of experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 52 lesions were included in this study, 25 malignant and 27 benign. All lesions were evaluated by four readers on two different workstations for the evaluation of dynamic breast MRI; one displaying the subtracted images and relative enhancement versus time curves and one displaying the subtracted images together with the 3TP color coding projected onto pre-contrast T1 images. Readers with different levels of experience were used. The diagnostic performance of both workstations was evaluated using ROC curve analyses. Interobserver variations were evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS All lesions were detected by all four readers on both workstations. The diagnostic performance found in the inexperienced readers improved significantly when using the 3TP evaluations (p=0.04 and p=0.03). No significant difference was found for the more experienced readers (p=0.94 and p=0.54). The level of agreement between the readers improved significantly when using the 3TP evaluation method (p=0.01). CONCLUSION Even though the 3TP color coding did not improve the diagnostic performance of the more experienced readers, this study clearly shows its value for inexperienced readers. The use of 3TP color coding is therefore recommended for inexperienced readers.

[1]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[2]  G Lutterbey,et al.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.

[3]  Peter Gibbs,et al.  Breast lesion analysis of shape technique: Semiautomated vs. manual morphological description , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Edna Schechtman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional diversity of the vasculature in benign and malignant breast lesions , 2005, Cancer.

[5]  M Cohnen,et al.  Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[6]  Hans H Schild,et al.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  Uwe Fischer,et al.  The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer , 2004, European Radiology.

[8]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[9]  Frederick Kelcz,et al.  Clinical testing of high-spatial-resolution parametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  N. Hylton,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. , 2004, JAMA.

[13]  D. Blondin,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection? , 2007, European Radiology.

[14]  Scott Fields,et al.  Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[15]  N. Hylton,et al.  Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. , 2006, Radiology.

[16]  L. Liberman,et al.  Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  U. Bick,et al.  Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria , 2001, European Radiology.

[18]  Simone Schrading,et al.  MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study , 2007, The Lancet.

[19]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.