Sustainability seen from the perspective of consumers

An important step in promoting sustainable consumption is to find out how consumers understand the concept of sustainability. In this paper, we report on a study among Norwegian consumers in which we explored their understanding of sustainability at two levels. First, we investigated consumers' understanding of the general sustainability concept; specifically, we studied how important the following five sustainability dimensions are in consumers' conception of sustainability: the environmental, social, economic, temporal and the developmental dimension. Second, we investigated how consumers' understanding of sustainability manifests itself in consumption decisions: We studied consumers' opinions about how important various attributes are for sustainable products and which product labels they consider indicative of sustainable products. We found that all five sustainability dimensions occurred as elements of consumers' understanding of the sustainability concept. The environmental dimension, the social dimension and the developmental dimension were particularly outstanding. With regard to attributes that are important for sustainable products, consumers placed high emphasis on recyclability of the packaging, fair payment of producers, low energy use and low carbon dioxide emissions during production and shipping. Humane animal treatment was also considered an important attribute of sustainable products. The product labels that were considered most indicative of sustainable products were the Nordic Swan and the Norwegian Debio label. Consumers' judgments of how indicative the labels are of sustainable products were related positively to familiarity with the labels.

[1]  Session,et al.  Resolution Adopted By The General Assembly , 1984, International Legal Materials.

[2]  Hugh Wilkins The Integration of the Pillars of Sustainable Development: A Work in Progress , 2008 .

[3]  Charles Francis,et al.  Food system orientation and quality perception among consumers and producers of organic food in Hedmark County, Norway , 2001 .

[4]  N. Jungbluth,et al.  Evidence for the coincidence effect in environmental judgments: why isn't it easy to correctly identify environmentally friendly food products? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  W. E. Baker,et al.  Brand Familiarity and Advertising: Effects on the Evoked Set and Brand Preference , 1986 .

[6]  M. Teisl,et al.  Non-dirty dancing? Interactions between eco-labels and consumers , 2008 .

[7]  J. Thøgersen Psychological Determinants of Paying Attention to Eco-Labels in Purchase Decisions: Model Development and Multinational Validation , 2000 .

[8]  Chris Janiszewski Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects , 1993 .

[9]  Caroline Josephine Burns (Doran),et al.  The Role of Personal Values in Fair Trade Consumption , 2009 .

[10]  Tagbata Didier,et al.  Measuring consumer's willingness to pay for organic and Fair Trade products , 2008 .

[11]  Y. Ma Young consumers' fair trade consumption: Application of the theory of planned behavior to non-food fair trade purchases , 2007 .

[12]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Organic Tomatoes Versus Canned Beans , 2011 .

[13]  Nachhaltiger Konsum: Zentrale Herausforderung für für moderne Verbraucherpolitik , 2005 .

[14]  A. Brouder Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International , 2010 .

[15]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[16]  L. Sirieix What do purchasers of Fair Trade products want , 2008 .

[17]  Carl Obermiller,et al.  Varieties of Mere Exposure: The Effects of Processing Style and Repetition on Affective Response , 1985 .

[18]  Ibon Galarraga Gallastegui THE USE OF ECO-LABELS: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 2002 .

[19]  B. Wynne,et al.  Book Reviews: public perceptions and sustainability in Lancashire: indicators, institutions, participation. , 1995 .

[20]  J. Thøgersen Norms for Environmentally Responsible Behaviour: An Extended Taxonomy , 2006 .

[21]  D. Zitzlsperger,et al.  Brands and Labels as Sustainability Signals , 2009 .

[22]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair‐Trade Coffee , 2005 .

[23]  P. Macnaghten,et al.  Public identification with sustainable development: Investigating cultural barriers to participation , 1997 .

[24]  Aric P Rindfleisch,et al.  Explaining the Familiarity-Liking Relationship: Mere Exposure, Information Availability, or Social Desirability? , 1998 .

[25]  G. Böhm,et al.  Can I Make a Difference? The Role of General and Domain-specific Self-efficacy in Sustainable Consumption Decisions , 2010 .

[26]  Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen,et al.  Caveat emptor – let the buyer beware! environmental labelling and the limitations of ‘green’ consumerism , 2006 .