Transcriptomics in Toxicogenomics, Part I: Experimental Design, Technologies, Publicly Available Data, and Regulatory Aspects

The starting point of successful hazard assessment is the generation of unbiased and trustworthy data. Conventional toxicity testing deals with extensive observations of phenotypic endpoints in vivo and complementing in vitro models. The increasing development of novel materials and chemical compounds dictates the need for a better understanding of the molecular changes occurring in exposed biological systems. Transcriptomics enables the exploration of organisms’ responses to environmental, chemical, and physical agents by observing the molecular alterations in more detail. Toxicogenomics integrates classical toxicology with omics assays, thus allowing the characterization of the mechanism of action (MOA) of chemical compounds, novel small molecules, and engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). Lack of standardization in data generation and analysis currently hampers the full exploitation of toxicogenomics-based evidence in risk assessment. To fill this gap, TGx methods need to take into account appropriate experimental design and possible pitfalls in the transcriptomic analyses as well as data generation and sharing that adhere to the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles. In this review, we summarize the recent advancements in the design and analysis of DNA microarray, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), and single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) data. We provide guidelines on exposure time, dose and complex endpoint selection, sample quality considerations and sample randomization. Furthermore, we summarize publicly available data resources and highlight applications of TGx data to understand and predict chemical toxicity potential. Additionally, we discuss the efforts to implement TGx into regulatory decision making to promote alternative methods for risk assessment and to support the 3R (reduction, refinement, and replacement) concept. This review is the first part of a three-article series on Transcriptomics in Toxicogenomics. These initial considerations on Experimental Design, Technologies, Publicly Available Data, Regulatory Aspects, are the starting point for further rigorous and reliable data preprocessing and modeling, described in the second and third part of the review series.

[1]  Aaron Diaz,et al.  Single-Cell mRNA Sequencing in Cancer Research: Integrating the Genomic Fingerprint , 2017, Front. Genet..

[2]  Deborah Berhanu,et al.  Multi-walled carbon nanotube length as a critical determinant of bioreactivity with primary human pulmonary alveolar cells. , 2014, Carbon.

[3]  Andrew Williams,et al.  Impact of Genomics Platform and Statistical Filtering on Transcriptional Benchmark Doses (BMD) and Multiple Approaches for Selection of Chemical Point of Departure (PoD) , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Justin Lamb,et al.  The Connectivity Map: a new tool for biomedical research , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[5]  Paul A Clemons,et al.  The Connectivity Map: Using Gene-Expression Signatures to Connect Small Molecules, Genes, and Disease , 2006, Science.

[6]  TaeJin Ahn,et al.  Practical approach to determine sample size for building logistic prediction models using high-throughput data , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[7]  Xun Zhu,et al.  Single cell transcriptomics reveals unanticipated features of early hematopoietic precursors , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  John S. House,et al.  A Pipeline for High-Throughput Concentration Response Modeling of Gene Expression for Toxicogenomics , 2017, Front. Genet..

[9]  Jiri Aubrecht,et al.  Comparison of toxicogenomics and traditional approaches to inform mode of action and points of departure in human health risk assessment of benzo[a]pyrene in drinking water , 2015, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[10]  D. Warheit,et al.  Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessments of C60 water suspensions in rats: few differences in fullerene toxicity in vivo in contrast to in vitro profiles. , 2007, Nano letters.

[11]  Heather L Ciallella,et al.  Advancing Computational Toxicology in the Big Data Era by Artificial Intelligence: Data-Driven and Mechanism-Driven Modeling for Chemical Toxicity. , 2019, Chemical research in toxicology.

[12]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Quantitative Monitoring of Gene Expression Patterns with a Complementary DNA Microarray , 1995, Science.

[13]  Thomas Ragg,et al.  The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements , 2006, BMC Molecular Biology.

[14]  Minnamari Vippola,et al.  A secretomics analysis reveals major differences in the macrophage responses towards different types of carbon nanotubes , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[15]  Sabrina Gioria,et al.  Changes in Caco-2 cells transcriptome profiles upon exposure to gold nanoparticles. , 2015, Toxicology letters.

[16]  Håkan Wallin,et al.  Surface modification does not influence the genotoxic and inflammatory effects of TiO2 nanoparticles after pulmonary exposure by instillation in mice , 2016, Mutagenesis.

[17]  Hongshan Guo,et al.  Single-cell RNA-seq transcriptome analysis of linear and circular RNAs in mouse preimplantation embryos , 2015, Genome Biology.

[18]  H. Ghosh,et al.  Emission from the Charge Transfer State of Xanthene Dye-Sensitized TiO2 Nanoparticles: A New Approach to Determining Back Electron Transfer Rate and Verifying the Marcus Inverted Regime , 2001 .

[19]  L Li,et al.  Systematic Quality Control Analysis of LINCS Data , 2016, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[20]  J. Marioni,et al.  Single-Cell Landscape of Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Cell Fate Decisions during Mouse Early Gastrulation , 2017, Cell reports.

[21]  Rachel Cavill,et al.  Extensive temporal transcriptome and microRNA analyses identify molecular mechanisms underlying mitochondrial dysfunction induced by multi-walled carbon nanotubes in human lung cells , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[22]  Andreas Bender,et al.  Developments in toxicogenomics: understanding and predicting compound-induced toxicity from gene expression data , 2018, Molecular omics.

[23]  Alexandra Kroll,et al.  Current in vitro methods in nanoparticle risk assessment: limitations and challenges. , 2009, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[24]  Rona S. Gertner,et al.  Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells , 2013, Nature.

[25]  Mary Gulumian,et al.  Gold Nanoparticle Interference Study during the Isolation, Quantification, Purity and Integrity Analysis of RNA , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  L. Lamon,et al.  Physiologically based mathematical models of nanomaterials for regulatory toxicology: A review , 2019, Computational toxicology.

[27]  Katherine J. Denby,et al.  Microarray experiments : considerations for experimental design : review article , 2005 .

[28]  Mary Gulumian,et al.  The presence of residual gold nanoparticles in samples interferes with the RT-qPCR assay used for gene expression profiling , 2017, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[29]  Vittorio Fortino,et al.  eUTOPIA: solUTion for Omics data PreprocessIng and Analysis , 2018, bioRxiv.

[30]  L. Gribaldo,et al.  High variability of genomic instability and gene expression profiling in different HeLa clones , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Alex E. Lash,et al.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[32]  Ola Spjuth,et al.  Toward the Replacement of Animal Experiments through the Bioinformatics-driven Analysis of ‘Omics’ Data from Human Cell Cultures , 2015, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[33]  Eleonore Fröhlich,et al.  Role of omics techniques in the toxicity testing of nanoparticles , 2017, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[34]  Thomas R. Pieber,et al.  Important issues in the cytotoxicity screening of nano-sized materials , 2010 .

[35]  Weida Tong,et al.  The challenge of the application of 'omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment: Background and outlook. , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[36]  Oliver Stueker,et al.  Understanding interactions of functionalized nanoparticles with proteins: a case study on lactate dehydrogenase. , 2014, Small.

[37]  G Chambers,et al.  Single walled carbon nanotubes induce indirect cytotoxicity by medium depletion in A549 lung cells. , 2008, Toxicology letters.

[38]  Junying Yuan,et al.  Single-Cell RNA Sequencing: Unraveling the Brain One Cell at a Time. , 2017, Trends in molecular medicine.

[39]  Carole L. Yauk,et al.  Toxicogenomic applications in risk assessment at Health Canada , 2019 .

[40]  E. Blomme,et al.  Comparison of RNA-Seq and Microarray Gene Expression Platforms for the Toxicogenomic Evaluation of Liver From Short-Term Rat Toxicity Studies , 2019, Front. Genet..

[41]  Rhona K. M. Smith Regulation (EC) No 764/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council , 2015 .

[42]  R. Snyder,et al.  Toxicogenomics in drug discovery and development: mechanistic analysis of compound/class-dependent effects using the DrugMatrix database. , 2006, Pharmacogenomics.

[43]  Andrew D. Rouillard,et al.  LINCS Canvas Browser: interactive web app to query, browse and interrogate LINCS L1000 gene expression signatures , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[44]  Teresa Lettieri,et al.  Recent Applications of DNA Microarray Technology to Toxicology and Ecotoxicology , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[45]  Donna K. Slonim,et al.  Getting Started in Gene Expression Microarray Analysis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  Megan S. Lord,et al.  Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response , 2010 .

[47]  Terry R Van Vleet,et al.  An Overview of Machine Learning and Big Data for Drug Toxicity Evaluation. , 2020, Chemical research in toxicology.

[48]  Katherine J. Denby,et al.  Microarray experiments: considerations for experimental design , 2005 .

[49]  Charles J. Vaske,et al.  Single-cell analyses of transcriptional heterogeneity during drug tolerance transition in cancer cells by RNA sequencing , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Reliability and reproducibility issues in DNA microarray measurements. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[51]  C. Murphy,et al.  Global transcriptomic analysis of model human cell lines exposed to surface-modified gold nanoparticles: the effect of surface chemistry. , 2015, Nanoscale.

[52]  Yan Guo,et al.  Power and sample size calculations for high-throughput sequencing-based experiments , 2018, Briefings Bioinform..

[53]  Margherita Scarpato,et al.  Novel Transcription Factor Variants through RNA-Sequencing: The Importance of Being “Alternative” , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[54]  Petri Auvinen,et al.  Network Analysis Reveals Similar Transcriptomic Responses to Intrinsic Properties of Carbon Nanomaterials in Vitro and in Vivo. , 2017, ACS nano.

[55]  Weida Tong,et al.  Toxicogenomics: A 2020 Vision. , 2019, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[56]  Joanne M Yeakley,et al.  A trichostatin A expression signature identified by TempO-Seq targeted whole transcriptome profiling , 2017, PloS one.

[57]  Dongmei Wu,et al.  Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Novel Mechanistic Insight into Murine Biological Responses to Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Lungs and Cultured Lung Epithelial Cells , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  A simple method for assessing sample sizes in microarray experiments , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[59]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  CEBS—Chemical Effects in Biological Systems: a public data repository integrating study design and toxicity data with microarray and proteomics data , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[60]  Craig A. Poland,et al.  Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[61]  Andreas Scherer,et al.  Batch Effects and Noise in Microarray Experiments: Sources and Solutions , 2009 .

[62]  O. B. Usta,et al.  Generation and manipulation of hydrogel microcapsules by droplet-based microfluidics for mammalian cell culture. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[63]  Hui Gong,et al.  CEBS: a comprehensive annotated database of toxicological data , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[64]  Jean Armengaud,et al.  High-throughput, quantitative assessment of the effects of low-dose silica nanoparticles on lung cells: grasping complex toxicity with a great depth of field , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[65]  Per Axel Clausen,et al.  Multi-walled carbon nanotube physicochemical properties predict pulmonary inflammation and genotoxicity , 2016, Nanotoxicology.

[66]  Minnamari Vippola,et al.  A Single Aspiration of Rod-like Carbon Nanotubes Induces Asbestos-like Pulmonary Inflammation Mediated in Part by the IL-1 Receptor. , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[67]  D. Warheit,et al.  Nanoscale and fine zinc oxide particles: can in vitro assays accurately forecast lung hazards following inhalation exposures? , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[68]  R. Russell,et al.  Effect of prostaglandin 15(R) 15 methyl-E2 methyl ester on aspirin and taurocholic acid-induced gastric mucosal haemorrhage in rats. , 1976, Gut.

[69]  Monika Mortimer,et al.  Impact of metal oxide nanoparticles on in vitro DNA amplification , 2019, PeerJ.

[70]  Hugh J. Byrne,et al.  Solubilization of SWNTs with Organic Dye Molecules , 2004 .

[71]  Eric T. Wang,et al.  An Abundance of Ubiquitously Expressed Genes Revealed by Tissue Transcriptome Sequence Data , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[72]  David M. Simcha,et al.  Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[73]  Flemming R. Cassee,et al.  On the pivotal role of dose for particle toxicology and risk assessment: exposure is a poor surrogate for delivered dose , 2017, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[74]  Dik van de Meent,et al.  Cellular uptake of nanoparticles as determined by particle properties, experimental conditions, and cell type , 2014, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[75]  Andrew Williams,et al.  Hepatic and Pulmonary Toxicogenomic Profiles in Mice Intratracheally Instilled With Carbon Black Nanoparticles Reveal Pulmonary Inflammation, Acute Phase Response, and Alterations in Lipid Homeostasis , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[76]  Maqc Consortium The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[77]  Sandrine Dudoit,et al.  Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-Seq experiments , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[78]  Shawn M. Gillespie,et al.  Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma , 2014, Science.

[79]  Vittorio Fortino,et al.  INfORM: Inference of NetwOrk Response Modules , 2018, Bioinform..

[80]  Helen E. Parkinson,et al.  ArrayExpress—a public database of microarray experiments and gene expression profiles , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[81]  Heidi Foth Abstracts of the 46th Congress of the European Societies of Toxicology (EUROTOX2009). Dresden, Germany. September 13-16, 2009. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[82]  Eleonore Fröhlich,et al.  Cellular targets and mechanisms in the cytotoxic action of non-biodegradable engineered nanoparticles. , 2013, Current drug metabolism.

[83]  Caffiyar Mohamed Yousuff,et al.  Microfluidic Platform for Cell Isolation and Manipulation Based on Cell Properties , 2017, Micromachines.

[84]  David B Warheit,et al.  Hazard and risk assessment strategies for nanoparticle exposures: how far have we come in the past 10 years? , 2018, F1000Research.

[85]  Stephen C. Harris,et al.  Rat toxicogenomic study reveals analytical consistency across microarray platforms , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[86]  Jason E. Stewart,et al.  Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[87]  Hicham Fenniri,et al.  Widespread Nanoparticle-Assay Interference: Implications for Nanotoxicity Testing , 2014, PloS one.

[88]  Ravi S Kane,et al.  The protein-nanomaterial interface. , 2006, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[89]  Gary A. Churchill,et al.  Importance of randomization in microarray experimental designs with Illumina platforms , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[90]  Alok Dhawan,et al.  Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[91]  Ann M Richard,et al.  The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. , 2019, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[92]  Vera Meyer,et al.  The use of open source bioinformatics tools to dissect transcriptomic data. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[93]  James J. Chen,et al.  Power and sample size estimation in microarray studies , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[94]  Russell S. Thomas,et al.  Recommended approaches in the application of toxicogenomics to derive points of departure for chemical risk assessment , 2016, Archives of Toxicology.

[95]  Andrew Williams,et al.  MWCNTs of different physicochemical properties cause similar inflammatory responses, but differences in transcriptional and histological markers of fibrosis in mouse lungs. , 2015, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[96]  JeanClare Seagrave,et al.  In vitro versus in vivo exposure to combustion emissions. , 2005, Experimental and toxicologic pathology : official journal of the Gesellschaft fur Toxikologische Pathologie.

[97]  Maqc Consortium The MicroArray Quality Control ( MAQC )-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models , 2012 .

[98]  Sean R. Davis,et al.  NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[99]  Ruchir R Shah,et al.  The Power of Resolution: Contextualized Understanding of Biological Responses to Liver Injury Chemicals Using High-throughput Transcriptomics and Benchmark Concentration Modeling. , 2019, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[100]  Phil Sayre,et al.  In vitro approaches to assess the hazard of nanomaterials , 2017 .

[101]  S. Kennedy,et al.  Adverse Outcome Pathway on Aryl hydrogen receptor activation leading to early life stage mortality, via reduced VEGF , 2019, OECD Series on Adverse Outcome Pathways.

[102]  Helinor J Johnston,et al.  A critical review of the biological mechanisms underlying the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of carbon nanotubes: The contribution of physico-chemical characteristics , 2010, Nanotoxicology.

[103]  Robert Petryszak,et al.  ArrayExpress update—simplifying data submissions , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[104]  N. Monteiro-Riviere,et al.  Limitations and relative utility of screening assays to assess engineered nanoparticle toxicity in a human cell line. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[105]  Chenghang Zong,et al.  Effective detection of variation in single-cell transcriptomes using MATQ-seq , 2017, Nature Methods.

[106]  Jie Zhou,et al.  RNA-seq differential expression studies: more sequence or more replication? , 2014, Bioinform..

[107]  Christie M. Sayes,et al.  Can in vitro assays substitute for in vivo studies in assessing the pulmonary hazards of fine and nanoscale materials? , 2009 .

[108]  Catalin C. Barbacioru,et al.  mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell , 2009, Nature Methods.

[109]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling , 2018, Front. Public Health.

[110]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Meeting Report: Validation of Toxicogenomics-Based Test Systems: ECVAM–ICCVAM/NICEATM Considerations for Regulatory Use , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[111]  Andrew Williams,et al.  Nano-risk Science: application of toxicogenomics in an adverse outcome pathway framework for risk assessment of multi-walled carbon nanotubes , 2015, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[112]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[113]  Morteza Mahmoudi,et al.  Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions , 2013 .

[114]  Russell S. Thomas,et al.  BMDExpress 2: enhanced transcriptomic dose-response analysis workflow , 2018, Bioinform..

[115]  Hitoshi Iwahashi,et al.  Toxicogenomics using yeast DNA microarrays. , 2010, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[116]  Navid B. Saleh,et al.  Overcoming qRT-PCR interference by select carbon nanotubes in assessments of gene expression. , 2017, BioTechniques.

[117]  David B Warheit,et al.  Assessing toxicity of fine and nanoparticles: comparing in vitro measurements to in vivo pulmonary toxicity profiles. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[118]  Carmine Zoccali,et al.  Sample Size Calculations , 2011, Nephron Clinical Practice.

[119]  Ravi S Kane,et al.  Nanobiotechnology: Protein‐Nanomaterial Interactions , 2007, Biotechnology progress.

[120]  Yong Qian,et al.  mRNA and miRNA regulatory networks reflective of multi-walled carbon nanotube-induced lung inflammatory and fibrotic pathologies in mice. , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[121]  Hiroshi Yamada,et al.  Open TG-GATEs: a large-scale toxicogenomics database , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[122]  S. Linnarsson,et al.  Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq , 2015, Science.

[123]  Vittorio Fortino,et al.  Integration of genome-wide mRNA and miRNA expression, and DNA methylation data of three cell lines exposed to ten carbon nanomaterials , 2018, Data in brief.

[124]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.

[125]  Wenyu Zhang,et al.  Fluorescence detection of Zinc oxide nanoparticles in water contamination analysis based on surface reactivity with porphyrin , 2018 .

[126]  I. Hellmann,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Methods , 2016, bioRxiv.

[127]  Ann M. Richard,et al.  Toward a public toxicogenomics capability for supporting predictive toxicology: survey of current resources and chemical indexing of experiments in GEO and ArrayExpress. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[128]  J. Trent,et al.  Microarrays and toxicology: The advent of toxicogenomics , 1999, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[129]  Vittorio Fortino,et al.  Inhalation and Oropharyngeal Aspiration Exposure to Rod-Like Carbon Nanotubes Induce Similar Airway Inflammation and Biological Responses in Mouse Lungs. , 2017, ACS nano.

[130]  Li Fei,et al.  Effect of Nanoparticles on Protein Folding and Fibrillogenesis , 2009, International journal of molecular sciences.

[131]  Åsa K. Björklund,et al.  Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2 , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[132]  Weida Tong,et al.  A generic Transcriptomics Reporting Framework (TRF) for 'omics data processing and analysis. , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[133]  Yongsheng Chen,et al.  Nanoparticles inhibit DNA replication by binding to DNA: modeling and experimental validation. , 2013, ACS nano.

[134]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project , 2017, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[135]  Angela N. Brooks,et al.  A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles , 2017, Cell.

[136]  Michael D Waters,et al.  Case study on the utility of hepatic global gene expression profiling in the risk assessment of the carcinogen furan. , 2014, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[137]  Emma Pedersen,et al.  Guidance Document on Good In Vitro Method Practices (GIVIMP) , 2018, OECD Series on Testing and Assessment.