The importance of the use phase on the LCA of environmentally friendly solutions for asphalt road pavements

Abstract In order to assess sustainability of products and processes, different methodologies have been developed and used in the last years. In the road pavement construction area, most methodologies used for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) are essentially focused in the construction phase. The present paper analyses the importance of the use phase of a road in the LCA of different paving alternatives, namely by evaluating energy consumption and gaseous emissions throughout the road pavement’s life. Therefore, a new LCA methodology for road pavements was developed, and the results of its application to a case study involving the construction of alternative pavement structures are discussed. The study intends to assess the influence of using more sustainable paving construction alternatives (asphalt recycling vs. conventional asphalt mixtures), and/or different surface course materials (which have a higher influence on the rolling resistance and, therefore, affect the performance during the use phase). The LCA results obtained for this case study showed that the reductions in energy consumption and gaseous emissions obtained during the use phase, for pavement alternatives with a lower rolling resistance surface course, are higher than the total amount of energy consumption and gas emissions produced during construction. It is therefore clear that some improvements in the characteristics of the surface course may have an effect over the road use phase that will rapidly balance the initial costs and gas emissions of those interventions. The LCA results obtained also showed that the sustainability of pavement construction may also be improved using recycled asphalt mixtures.

[1]  Dave Amos Pavement Smoothness and Fuel Efficiency: An Analysis of the Economic Dimensions of the Missouri Smooth Road Initiative. , 2006 .

[2]  Eric Masanet,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of pavements. Part I: Critical review , 2011 .

[3]  M Nunn,et al.  Development of a more versatile approach to flexible and flexible composite pavement design , 2004 .

[4]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[5]  D Goos,et al.  Environmental impacts and fuel efficiency of road pavements , 2004 .

[6]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[7]  Yue Huang,et al.  Development of a life cycle assessment tool for construction and maintenance of asphalt pavements , 2009 .

[8]  Pedro José Pérez-Martínez,et al.  Energy consumption and emissions from the road transport in Spain: a conceptual approach , 2012 .

[9]  W. Adrian,et al.  Influence of Pavement Reflectance on Lighting for Parking Lots by , 2005 .

[10]  A. Marion,et al.  Study Of The Leaching Behaviour Of Paving Concretes: Quantification Of Heavy Metal Content In Leachates Issued From Tank Test Using Demineralized Water , 2005 .

[11]  Claus Pade,et al.  Carbon dioxide uptake in demolished and crushed concrete , 2005 .

[12]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Comparative pavement life cycle assessment with parameter uncertainty , 2013 .

[13]  Colorado Colorado,et al.  AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS , 2010 .

[14]  P. Bowen,et al.  Changes in portlandite morphology with solvent composition: Atomistic simulations and experiment , 2011 .

[15]  Paulo A. A. Pereira,et al.  Mechanical Characterisation of Hot Mix Recycled Materials , 2004 .

[16]  H. Brandt,et al.  Aqueous leaching of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from bitumen and asphalt. , 2001, Water research.

[17]  R. Cassen Our common future: report of the World Commission on Environment and Development , 1987 .

[18]  Gw Taylor,et al.  Effects of Pavement Structure on Vehicle Fuel Consumption - Phase III , 2006 .

[19]  Rosario Vidal,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hot mix asphalt and zeolite-based warm mix asphalt with reclaimed asphalt pavement , 2013 .

[20]  L. coord. Bragança,et al.  Life-cycle analysis of buildings : envirnonmental impact of building elements , 2012 .

[21]  Eul-Bum Lee,et al.  Life cycle energy consumption and GHG emission from pavement rehabilitation with different rolling resistance , 2012 .

[22]  H Stripple,et al.  LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD: A PILOT STUDY FOR INVENTORY ANALYSIS. SECOND REVISED EDITION , 2001 .

[23]  Liliana M. B. Costa,et al.  Waste polymers recycling in high performance asphalt mixtures , 2011 .

[24]  Eric Masanet,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of pavements Part II: Filling the research gaps , 2011 .

[25]  Christoph Gehlen,et al.  life cycle assessment for road construction and use , 2011 .

[26]  H Bendtsen,et al.  Rolling resistance, fuel consumption - a literature review , 2004 .

[27]  Margaret Bell,et al.  A comparative study of the emissions by road maintenance works and the disrupted traffic using life cycle assessment and micro-simulation , 2009 .

[28]  Pedro José Pérez-Martínez,et al.  Energy consumption and intensity of toll highway transport in Spain , 2014 .

[29]  Alan Woodside,et al.  ROLLING RESISTANCE OF SURFACE MATERIALS AFFECTED BY SURFACE TYPE, TYRE LOAD AND INFLATION PRESSURE , 2003 .

[30]  John T Harvey,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Pavements , 2014 .

[31]  B. Lagerblad Carbon Dioxide Uptake during Concrete Life Cycle - State of the Art , 2005 .