Measurement of low-frequency noise during CNC machining and its assessment

Abstract The aim of the paper is to point out the necessity to measure noise exposure by means of weighting filter Z, not only weighting filter A, which is prescribed by the standard. The measurement in the paper confirms the various acoustic pressure levels using weighting filter A and weighting filter Z at a low-frequency from 16 Hz to a frequency of 100 Hz. Such measurements suggest that the way in which this noise is evaluated must be adjusted. Due to the risks of exposure to excessive noise, the legislation prescribes regular measurement of permissible noise levels. European legislation and technical standards (e.g. ISO 1996) prescribe “weighting A” in case of such noise. However, this does not respect the energetic effect of sound on the auditory organ, as well as the neuropsychic and cardiovascular system of humans and sensory-motor functions. Experiments and research show that when evaluating low-frequency sounds with strong acoustic energy, the evaluation procedures should be adjusted to the impact of real acoustic energy affecting humans. The noise exposure measurement described in the paper was carried out during production of cars parts that were machined by a CNC machine. The measurement results showed that when weighting filter Z was used, the acoustic pressure levels were higher than those measured by weighting filter A by 22.8 dB. The measured equivalent L Zeq values for the given work activity were 73.4 dB(Z) and L Aeq was 50.6 dB(A). At low frequencies, this difference was the most pronounced, up to several times higher.

[1]  Luba Bicejova,et al.  The Influence of Technology Head Shift Speed, Abrasive Kind and Granularity on Technology Head Vibration during Hard-to-Machine Material Cutting , 2014 .

[2]  I. Alimohammadi,et al.  Comparison between effects of low and high frequency noise on mental performance , 2017 .

[3]  Adam Dudarewicz,et al.  The impact of low-frequency noise on human mental performance. , 2005, International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health.

[4]  S. Janssen,et al.  Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health , 2014, The Lancet.

[5]  Menderes Kalkat Experimentally vibration and noise analysis of two types of washing machines with a proposed neural network predictor , 2014 .

[6]  Juraj Sinay,et al.  Acoustic Risk Management , 2014 .

[7]  V. P. Agrawal,et al.  Vibration and noise analysis of computer hard disk drives , 2006 .

[8]  S. Ziaran The assessment and evaluation of low-frequency noise near the region of infrasound. , 2014, Noise & health.

[9]  Marek Pawelczyk,et al.  Evaluation of measurement value and uncertainty of sound pressure level difference obtained by active device noise reduction , 2017 .

[10]  Michal Puškár,et al.  Measuring of accoustic wave influences generated at various configurations of racing engine inlet and exhaust system on brake mean effective pressure , 2013 .

[11]  P. Remoaldo,et al.  The Influence of Low-Frequency Noise Pollution on the Quality of Life and Place in Sustainable Cities: A Case Study from Northern Portugal , 2015 .