Tailoring: what's in a name?

Tailoring: what’s in a name? tailor-made clothing, custom fit in size and style to a particular person. The second corresponds Health Education Research has taken a lead in more nearly to the process of target marketing, publishing findings from the recent wave of studies appealing to a defined population subgroup that is reporting the effects of tailored health education expected to like a particular size or style of interventions. However, in this journal and elseclothing. This latter approach may be more approwhere, there has been considerable variation in priately labeled as ‘targeted’ rather than tailored. what is meant by the descriptor ‘tailored’. As a Targeting involves development of a single intergrowing number of health education researchers vention approach for a defined population subgroup and practitioners have added the language of that takes into account characteristics shared by tailoring to their vocabulary and the possibility of the subgroup’s members. These subgroups may be tailoring to their repertoire of intervention methods, very small and quite specifically defined, such as it is increasingly important that the field provide a African-American women aged 50–65 belonging clear definition for tailoring and seek to standardize to a particular neighborhood health center. Targetrelated terminology. ing is based upon the advertising principle of We would like to suggest that tailoring be defined market segmentation, which aims to find the right as follows: kinds of consumers for a particular product or service (Peppers and Rogers, 1993). Several Any combination of information or change recently published studies contain similar examples strategies intended to reach one specific person, of group-targeted interventions which have neverbased on characteristics that are unique to that theless been described as tailored (Davis et al., person, related to the outcome of interest, and 1992; Rimer and Orleans, 1994; Rimer et al., 1994; have been derived from an individual assessDrossaert et al., 1996; Morgan et al., 1996). For ment. (Kreuter et al., 1999a,b) example, Eakin and colleagues described tailoring as ‘a process of producing a video whose content This definition highlights the two features of a and characters are adapted for or designed to tailored health promotion intervention that distinappeal to a particular target population’ [(Eakin guish it from other commonly used approaches: et al., 1998), p. 520] and Pasick described tailoring (1) its collection of messages or strategies is as ‘the adaptation of interventions to best fit the intended for a particular person rather than a group relevant needs and characteristics of a specified of people and (2) these messages or strategies are target population’ (Pasick, 1997). based on individual-level factors that are related In contrast to targeting, tailoring—as we have to the health or behavioral outcome of interest. defined it—refers to a process of creating indiviOur rationale is as follows. dualized intervention materials or strategies. This The word tailor comes from the Latin word approach has also been referred to as ‘individual talea meaning ‘to cut’. Its common usage today is tailoring’ or ‘computer tailoring’. The published to make or adapt to fit a particular purpose—as in literature contains a number of intervention studies tailor-made clothing. Although we have found no using this tailoring approach (Prochaska et al., uses of the term tailoring in the published literature 1993; Campbell et al., 1994, 1999; Skinner et al., which betray this general meaning, there are clearly 1994; Strecher et al., 1994; Curry et al., 1995; different interpretations and operational definiKreuter and Strecher, 1995, 1996; Brug et al. 1996, tions of the concept. Appropriately, most authors 1998; Bull and Jamrozik, 1998; Dijkstra et al., describe tailoring as a process of specially creating 1998a–c; Marcus et al., 1998; Rakowski et al., intervention materials or activities. The details 1998; Bull et al., 1999; Kreuter et al., 1999b; of that process typically fall into one of two categories. The first corresponds more closely to Lipkus et al., 1999; Rimer et al., 1999) In these

[1]  V. Strecher,et al.  One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials , 1999, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[2]  Laura R. Olevitch,et al.  Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication With Computer Technology , 1999 .

[3]  F. Bull,et al.  Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[4]  B. Rimer,et al.  The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[5]  B. Rimer,et al.  Using tailored interventions to enhance smoking cessation among African-Americans at a community health center. , 1999, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[6]  F. Bull,et al.  Effects of tailored, personalized and general health messages on physical activity. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[7]  David D. Potenziani,et al.  Varying the message source in computer-tailored nutrition education. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[8]  Celette Sugg Skinner,et al.  How effective is tailored print communication? , 1999, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[9]  Edward Lichtenstein,et al.  Use of tailored videos in primary care smoking cessation interventions , 1998 .

[10]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Tailoring information to enhance quitting in smokers with low motivation to quit: three basic efficacy questions. , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[11]  W F Velicer,et al.  Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. , 1998, Preventive medicine.

[12]  F. Bull,et al.  Advice on exercise from a family physician can help sedentary patients to become active. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[13]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  The Impact of Computer-Tailored Feedback and Iterative Feedback on Fat, Fruit, and Vegetable Intake , 1998, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[14]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Computerized tailored feedback to change cognitive determinants of smoking: a Dutch field experiment. , 1998, Health education research.

[15]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feedback in smoking cessation. , 1998, Health education research.

[16]  B H Marcus,et al.  Evaluation of Motivationally Tailored vs. Standard Self-Help Physical Activity Interventions at the Workplace , 1998, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[17]  E. Perez-stable,et al.  Pathways to Early Cancer Detection for Latinas: En Acción Contra el Cáncer , 1996 .

[18]  C. Drossaert,et al.  Health education to improve repeat participation in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme: evaluation of a leaflet tailored to previous participants. , 1996, Patient education and counseling.

[19]  J. Brug,et al.  The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. , 1996, Preventive medicine.

[20]  B. Rimer,et al.  Reaching midlife and older smokers: tailored interventions for routine medical care. , 1996, Preventive medicine.

[21]  V. Strecher,et al.  Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. , 1996, Health education research.

[22]  E H Wagner,et al.  A randomized trial of self-help materials, personalized feedback, and telephone counseling with nonvolunteer smokers. , 1995, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[23]  V. Strecher,et al.  Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: results from a randomized trial. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[24]  B. Rimer,et al.  Tailoring smoking cessation for older adults , 1994, Cancer.

[25]  V. Strecher,et al.  The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. , 1994, The Journal of family practice.

[26]  V. Strecher,et al.  Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[27]  B. Rimer,et al.  Does tailoring matter? The impact of a tailored guide on ratings and short-term smoking-related outcomes for older smokers. , 1994, Health education research.

[28]  V. Strecher,et al.  Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? , 1994, American journal of public health.

[29]  W F Velicer,et al.  Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[30]  Don Peppers,et al.  The One to One Future: Building Relationships One Customer at a Time (Будущее персонализации: построение взаимоотношений с одним клиентом) , 1993 .

[31]  B. Rimer,et al.  The Impact of Tailored Self-Help Smoking Cessation Guides on Young Mothers , 1992, Health education quarterly.

[32]  K. Glanz,et al.  Health behavior and health education : theory, research, and practice , 1991 .

[33]  N. Medrano,et al.  [Socioeconomic and cultural factors in the gastrointestinal and nutritional disorders]. , 1968, Archivos argentinos de pediatria.