OBJECTIVE
The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria for Imaging and Treatment Decisions are intended to help radiologists and referring physicians use imaging procedures appropriately and cost-effectively, but these criteria have not undergone empirical testing. To assess how readily the ACR appropriateness criteria can be applied to clinical practice, we retrospectively examined their applicability in a general ambulatory care setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From all requests during an 8-month period for noninterventional CT, sonography, MR imaging, and nuclear medicine imaging procedures received from a general internal medicine clinic, we excluded cases for which relevant clinic notes were unavailable or incomplete. Three experienced radiologists classified cases by consensus, using data from radiology requests and clinic notes. Cases were classified as a "complete match" if the features matched a clinical condition and variant included in the ACR appropriateness criteria; as a "partial match" if the features matched a clinical condition but did not match all features of a variant; or as "unmatched."
RESULTS
Of 316 cases, there were 202 complete matches (64%) and 37 partial matches (12%). Of the 77 unmatched cases (24%), 14 pertained to asymptomatic patients.
CONCLUSION
The ACR appropriateness criteria could be applied to 76% of the imaging procedure requests that we received from a general internal medicine clinic. These results suggest that the ACR appropriateness criteria can be applied to diagnostic imaging in a general ambulatory-care setting.
[1]
C. E. Kahn,et al.
Appropriateness of imaging procedure requests: do radiologists agree?
,
1997,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[2]
E. Mendelson.
The Development and Meaning of Appropriateness Guidelines
,
1997,
Radiologic clinics of North America.
[3]
D L Sackett,et al.
On the need for evidence-based medicine.
,
1995,
Therapie.
[4]
B. Manaster,et al.
Do radiologists use the American College of Radiology Musculoskeletal Appropriateness Criteria?
,
2000,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[5]
G Worrall,et al.
The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.
,
1997,
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.