Rangelands, surface mines, construction sites, unprotected and long slopes, gullies, eroding stream channels, and
erosion plots will yield large sediment loads under high intensity rainfalls. Conventional flow-measuring devices can easily
become clogged with sediment and debris during a major runoff event, resulting in the loss of runoff and sediment records.
Flow measurements can also be inaccurate using conventional flow-measuring devices in steep channels. The drop-box weir
(DBW) was developed to overcome many of the problems encountered in sediment-laden flow measurement. The weir creates
turbulence in a box that entrains and passes sediment through the weir. It is not a well-known device, and it has not been widely
used. Yet it is only one of two devices suitable for obtaining flow records with large sediment concentrations. It has utility
for a range of watershed sizes from small erosion plots to large watersheds. Information on what is known about the design
and operation of the DBW, and of sediment sampling approaches using the DBW, was compiled. Weir sizing, rating-curve
development, and sampling strategies were presented to facilitate its use and to identify its limitations. There are four known
configurations of the DBW: the original weir with upper weir lips; a modification of the DBW for erosion plots (removal of
upper weir lips); a modification of the DBW for small watersheds in steep and skewed channels (removal of upper weir lips
and use of baffle); and a Korean version of the weir (larger chute opening to minimize blockage of trash – suitable for large
and small watersheds). For each of the four configurations, rating tables and weir-sizing guidelines were summarized.
Low-flow rating curves must be developed from field data for individual weirs, but laboratory curves can be used for larger
flow rates. Curve-fitting procedures are outlined specifically for determining rating-curve equations where field data are
obtained. Water samplers designed specifically for use with DBWs are described. Other design considerations are discussed
for practical use of DBWs including measurement of stage, maintenance, and sediment traps. Research needs for hydraulic
modeling and sediment sampling are presented.
[1]
James V. Bonta,et al.
IMPACT OF COAL SURFACE MINING ON THREE OHIO WATERSHEDS ‐ SURFACE‐WATER HYDROLOGY 1
,
1997
.
[2]
J. V. Bonta,et al.
Modification and performance of the Coshocton wheel with the modified drop-box weir
,
2002
.
[3]
L. B. Owens,et al.
Large storm effects on total soil erosion
,
1991
.
[4]
A SUPERCRITICAL FLUME FOR MEASURING SEDIMENT‐LADEN STREAMFLOW
,
1986
.
[5]
T. K. Edwards,et al.
Field methods for measurement of fluvial sediment
,
1998
.
[6]
J. V. Bonta,et al.
WATER SAMPLER AND FLOW MEASUREMENT FOR RUNOFF CONTAINING LARGE SEDIMENT PARTICLES
,
1999
.
[7]
Wendell R. Gwinn,et al.
The Performance of a Modified Coshocton-Type Runoff Sampler
,
1981
.
[8]
James V. Bonta,et al.
IMPACT OF COAL SURFACE MINING AND RECLAMATION ON SUSPENDED SEDIMENT IN THREE OHIO WATERSHEDS 1
,
2000
.
[9]
Walter J. Rawls,et al.
Field manual for research in agricultural hydrology.
,
1979
.
[10]
J. R. Simanton,et al.
Small watershed automatic water quality sampler
,
1986
.
[11]
J. Y. Wang,et al.
Modification of H-Flume and Coshocton Wheel System
,
1971
.
[12]
J. V. Bonta,et al.
MODIFIED DROP–BOX WEIR FOR MONITORING WATERSHED FLOWS UNDER EXTREME APPROACH CHANNEL CONDITIONS
,
2001
.
[13]
J. V. Bonta.
Modified drop-box weir for monitoring flows from erosion plots and small watersheds
,
1998
.
[14]
F. Pierson,et al.
Hydrologic response of diverse western rangelands.
,
2002
.
[15]
W. R. Gwinn,et al.
Supercritical Flow Flumes for Measuring Sediment-Laden Flow
,
1982
.