Thinking and Computing: Computers as Special Kinds of Signs

Cognitive science has been dominated by the computational conception that cognition is computation across representations. To the extent to which cognition as computation across representations is supposed to be a purposive, meaningful, algorithmic, problem-solving activity, however, computers appear to be incapable of cognition. They are devices that can facilitate computations on the basis of semantic grounding relations as special kinds of signs. Even their algorithmic, problem-solving character arises from their interpretation by human users. Strictly speaking, computers as such — apart from human users — are not only incapable of cognition, but even incapable of computation, properly construed. If we want to understand the nature of thought, then we have to study thinking, not computing, because they are not the same thing.

[1]  James H. Fetzer Aspects of Artificial Intelligence , 1987 .

[2]  Stephen Cole Kleene Mathematical Logic , 1967 .

[3]  Harold Thimbleby Book review: Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits By James H. Fetzer (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990) , 1991, SGAR.

[4]  John von Neumann,et al.  The Computer and the Brain , 1960 .

[5]  John R. Searle,et al.  The Rediscovery of the Mind , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[6]  James H. Fetzer Philosophy and Cognitive Science , 1990 .

[7]  James H. Fetzer Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits , 1990 .

[8]  John T. Kearns Thinking Machines: Some Fundamental Confusions , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[9]  James H. Fetzer Primitive Concepts: Habits, Conventions, and Laws , 1991 .

[10]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search , 1976, CACM.

[11]  James H. Fetzer,et al.  People are not computers: (most) thought processes are not computational procedures , 1998, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[12]  Carol E. Cleland Is the Church-Turing thesis true? , 1993, Minds and Machines.

[13]  Edwina L. Rissland,et al.  Cognitive Science: An Introduction , 1987 .

[14]  William J. Rapaport,et al.  Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural-Language Understanding , 1988 .

[15]  M. Voytko Cognitive Science: An Introduction , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Paul Coates,et al.  Meaning, Mistake and Miscalculation , 1997, Minds and Machines.

[17]  John C. Haugland Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence , 1981 .

[18]  D. Dennett Kinds Of Minds , 1996 .

[19]  James H. Fetzer Signs and Minds: An Introduction to the Theory of Semiotic Systems , 1988 .

[20]  James H. Fetzer Language and Mentality: Computational, Representational, and Dispositional Conceptions , 1990 .

[21]  John Haugeland Mind Design II: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence , 1997 .

[22]  B. Eckardt What Is Cognitive Science , 1992 .

[23]  D. Dennett Darwin's Dangerous Idea , 1995 .

[24]  Daniel I. A. Cohen,et al.  Introduction to computer theory , 1986 .

[25]  D. Dennett Consciousness Explained. Boston (Little, Brown and Co) 1991. , 1991 .

[26]  J. Launer Darwin's dangerous idea. , 2002, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[27]  A. Kox,et al.  THE COLLECTED PAPERS OF , 1996 .

[28]  Carol E. Cleland Effective procedures and computable functions , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[29]  Leon Horsten,et al.  The Church-Turing thesis and effective mundane procedures , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[30]  M. Resnik,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation. , 1966 .

[31]  James H. Fetzer Mental Algorithms: Are Minds Computational Systems? , 1994 .

[32]  James H. Fetzer Artificial intelligence meets David Hume: a response to Pat Hayes , 1990 .

[33]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.