Double-bar application decreases postoperative pain after the Nuss procedure.

OBJECTIVE This biomechanical study aims to elucidate whether additional bar application increases postoperative pain after the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. METHODS Clinical evaluation: The intensity of postoperative pain was compared between patients for whom a single-bar was used (single-bar group: n = 14) and those for whom double bars (double-bar group: n = 10) were used to correct the thoracic deformity. The evaluation was performed by referring to the frequency with which local anesthetics were self-injected in a patient-controlled anesthetic system and how many days were needed for the patients to resume ambulation. Theoretical evaluation: An original simulation system for the Nuss procedure was developed by producing 3-dimensional finite element analysis models from computed tomographic data of patients with pectus excavatum. With this system, single-bar and double-bar placement was simulated separately for the thorax models of the double-bar group. The stresses occurring on the thoraces were then compared between the two situations. RESULTS Clinical evaluation: Self-injection of local anesthetic was more frequent for the single-bar group than for the double-bar group; single-bar patients restarted ambulation later than the double-bar group. Theoretical evaluation: Stresses on the thoraces were smaller when double bars were applied than when a single bar was applied. CONCLUSIONS Performing double-bar placement decreases postoperative pain. Therefore, surgeons should not hesitate to perform double-bar correction in patients in whom the deformity extends to multiple intercostal spaces, requiring correction of the thorax shape at multiple sites.

[1]  M. E. Katz,et al.  A 10-year review of a minimally invasive technique for the correction of pectus excavatum. , 1998, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[2]  Tatsuo Nakajima,et al.  Stress distribution on the thorax after the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum results in different patterns between adult and child patients. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  A. Schwabegger,et al.  A Rounded Dissector to Reduce Complications in the Minimally Invasive Repair (Nuss) of Pectus Excavatum in Adolescents and Adults , 2008, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[4]  T M Keaveny,et al.  Biomechanical consequences of an isolated overload on the human vertebral body , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  Józef Dzielicki,et al.  Difficulties and limitations in minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum--6 years experiences with Nuss technique. , 2006, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[6]  M. Goretsky,et al.  The minimally invasive Nuss technique for recurrent or failed pectus excavatum repair in 50 patients. , 2005, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[7]  T. Nagasao,et al.  The Effect of Striking Angle on the Buckling Mechanism in Blowout Fracture , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  T. Ohashi,et al.  Tagged cine magnetic resonance imaging with a finite element model can predict the severity of retrosternal adhesions prior to redo cardiac surgery. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  C. Deschamps,et al.  Minimally invasive repair for pectus excavatum in adults. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  C. Tzao,et al.  Clinical experience of Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum in adult female patients. , 2008, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[11]  Hiromichi Kamamoto,et al.  Anesthetic management for the minimally invasive Nuss procedure in 21 patients with pectus excavatum , 2005, Journal of Anesthesia.

[12]  B. Griffith,et al.  Treatment of aortic stenosis with aortic valve bypass (apicoaortic conduit) surgery: an assessment using computational modeling. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  J A Haller,et al.  Use of CT scans in selection of patients for pectus excavatum surgery: a preliminary report. , 1987, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[14]  B. Reingruber,et al.  Forces to be overcome in correction of pectus excavatum. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  T. Nagasao,et al.  The Dynamic Role of Buttress Reconstruction after Maxillectomy , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  K. Neumann,et al.  Superior postoperative pain relief with thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Hyung Joo Park,et al.  The Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: evolution of techniques and early results on 322 patients. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  J. Windhaber,et al.  Minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum in adult patients. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  M. Kralik,et al.  Postoperative analgesia with intravenous fentanyl PCA vs epidural block after thoracoscopic pectus excavatum repair in children. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.