Accuracy assessment of target tracking using two 5-degrees-of-freedom wireless transponders

Purpose Surgical navigation systems are generally only applied for targets in rigid areas. For non-rigid areas, real-time tumor tracking can be included to compensate for anatomical changes. The only clinically cleared system using a wireless electromagnetic tracking technique is the Calypso ® System (Varian Medical Systems Inc., USA), designed for radiotherapy. It is limited to tracking maximally three wireless 5-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) transponders, all used for tumor tracking. For surgical navigation, a surgical tool has to be tracked as well. In this study, we evaluated whether accurate 6DOF tumor tracking is possible using only two 5DOF transponders, leaving one transponder to track a tool. Methods Two methods were defined to derive 6DOF information out of two 5DOF transponders. The first method uses the vector information of both transponders (TTV), and the second method combines the vector information of one transponder with the distance vector between the transponders (OTV). The accuracy of tracking a rotating object was assessed for each method mimicking clinically relevant and worst-case configurations. Accuracy was compared to using all three transponders to derive 6DOF (Default method). An optical tracking system was used as a reference for accuracy. Results The TTV method performed best and was as accurate as the Default method for almost all transponder configurations (median errors < 0.5°, 95% confidence interval < 3°). Only when the angle between the transponders was less than 2°, the TTV method was inaccurate and the OTV method may be preferred. The accuracy of both methods was independent of the angle of rotation, and only the OTV method was sensitive to the plane of rotation. Conclusion These results indicate that accurate 6DOF tumor tracking is possible using only two 5DOF transponders. This encourages further development of a wireless EM surgical navigation approach using a readily available clinical system.

[1]  Dirk Schulze,et al.  Radiologically assisted navigation in cochlear implantation for X-linked deafness malformation , 2009, Cochlear implants international.

[2]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Comparing position and orientation accuracy of different electromagnetic sensors for tracking during interventions , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[3]  Volker Seifert,et al.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the surgical treatment of cerebral metastases , 2010, Journal of surgical oncology.

[4]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Electromagnetic Tracking in Medicine—A Review of Technology, Validation, and Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Mingyao Zhu,et al.  Adaptive radiation therapy for postprostatectomy patients using real-time electromagnetic target motion tracking during external beam radiation therapy. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  John Wong,et al.  Accuracy of a wireless localization system for radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  T. Omori,et al.  Sentinel node navigation surgery in early-stage esophageal cancer. , 2012, Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia.

[8]  Q. Nguyen,et al.  Image‐guided surgery in cancer: A strategy to reduce incidence of positive surgical margins , 2018, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[9]  ACCURACY OF PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION TECHNIQUES , 2018, Acta ortopedica brasileira.

[10]  E. Horwitz,et al.  Transrectal implantation of electromagnetic transponders following radical prostatectomy for delivery of IMRT. , 2011, The Canadian journal of urology.

[11]  Herbert Cattell,et al.  Electromagnetic detection and real-time DMLC adaptation to target rotation during radiotherapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Julia Götstedt,et al.  Clinical feasibility and positional stability of an implanted wired transmitter in a novel electromagnetic positioning system for prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  U. Stöckle,et al.  Computer-assisted navigation is beneficial both in primary and revision surgery with modular rotating-hinge knee arthroplasty , 2014, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  Sanford L. Meeks,et al.  Expanding the use of real‐time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology , 2011, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics.

[15]  James M. Metz,et al.  Feasibility of electromagnetic transponder use to monitor inter- and intrafractional motion in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Martin J Murphy,et al.  The effect of transponder motion on the accuracy of the Calypso Electromagnetic localization system. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  K. Cleary,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking for abdominal interventions in computer aided surgery , 2006, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[18]  Roeland Eppenga,et al.  Accuracy assessment of wireless transponder tracking in the operating room environment , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[19]  Andrew D. Wiles,et al.  Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems , 2004, Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures.

[20]  Y. Oshman,et al.  Averaging Quaternions , 2007 .

[21]  Andras Lasso,et al.  PLUS: Open-Source Toolkit for Ultrasound-Guided Intervention Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Sanford L. Meeks,et al.  Clinical Experience with the Calypso® 4D Localization System in Prostate Cancer Patients: Implantation, Tolerance, Migration, Localization and Real Time Tracking , 2005 .

[23]  Logan W. Clements,et al.  Image-guided liver surgery: intraoperative projection of computed tomography images utilizing tracked ultrasound. , 2012, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[24]  S Nill,et al.  Standardized accuracy assessment of the calypso wireless transponder tracking system , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Lena Maier-Hein,et al.  Robust augmented reality guidance with fluorescent markers in laparoscopic surgery , 2016, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[26]  Robert L Galloway,et al.  Image-Guided Abdominal Surgery and Therapy Delivery. , 2012, Journal of healthcare engineering.

[27]  L. Maier-Hein,et al.  Electromagnetic organ tracking allows for real-time compensation of tissue shift in image-guided laparoscopic rectal surgery: results of a phantom study , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[28]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Real-time wireless tumor tracking during breast conserving surgery , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[29]  I. Kehagias,et al.  Up-to-date intraoperative computer assisted solutions for liver surgery , 2019, World journal of gastrointestinal surgery.

[30]  A M Franz,et al.  Standardized assessment of new electromagnetic field generators in an interventional radiology setting. , 2012, Medical physics.

[31]  Andras Lasso,et al.  Navigated Breast Tumor Excision Using Electromagnetically Tracked Ultrasound and Surgical Instruments , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  S. Chang,et al.  Usefulness of Intraoperative Computer Tomography-Assisted Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Small-Sized Lung Cancer. , 2016, Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia.