Characteristics of Inhalable Particulate Matter Concentration and Size Distribution from Power Plants in China

Abstract In this investigation, the collection efficiency of particulate emission control devices (PECDs), particulate matter (PM) emissions, and PM size distribution were determined experimentally at the inlet and outlet of PECDs at five coal-fired power plants. Different boilers, coals, and PECDs are used in these power plants. Measurement in situ was performed by an electrical low-pressure impactor with a sampling system, which consisted of an isokinetic sampler probe, precut cyclone, and two-stage dilution system with a sample line to the instruments. The size distribution was measured over a range from 0.03 to 10 µm. Before and after all of the PECDs, the particle number size distributions display a bimodal distribution. The PM2.5 fraction emitted to atmosphere includes a significant amount of the mass from the coarse particle mode. The controlled and uncontrolled emission factors of total PM, inhalable PM (PM10), and fine PM P(M2.5) were obtained. Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and baghouse total collection efficiencies are 96.38–99.89% and 99.94%, respectively. The minimum collection efficiency of the ESP and the baghouse both appear in the particle size range of 0.1–1 µm. In this size range, ESP and baghouse collection efficiencies are 85.79–98.6% and 99.54%. Real-time measurement shows that the mass and number concentration of PM10 will be greatly affected by the operating conditions of the PECDs. The number of emitted particles increases with increasing boiler load level because of higher combustion temperature. During test run periods, the data reproducibility is satisfactory.

[1]  J. Keskinen,et al.  Fine particle size distributions of seven different combustion power plants , 1998 .

[2]  A. Robinson,et al.  Effects of Sampling Conditions on the Size Distribution of Fine Particulate Matter Emitted from a Pilot-Scale Pulverized-Coal Combustor , 2002 .

[3]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Combustion sources of particles. 1. Health relevance and source signatures. , 2002, Chemosphere.

[4]  R. Hillamo,et al.  Electrostatic precipitator collection efficiency and trace element emissions from co-combustion of biomass and recovered fuel in fluidized-bed combustion. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  T. Bond,et al.  Climate-Relevant Particulate Emission Characteristics of a Coal Fired Heating Plant , 1999 .

[6]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ELECTRICAL LOW-PRESSURE IMPACTOR (ELPI) , 2000 .

[7]  U. Tapper,et al.  Ash formation during fluidized-bed incineration of paper mill waste sludge , 1998 .

[8]  Joseph J. Helble,et al.  A model for the air emissions of trace metallic elements from coal combustors equipped with electrostatic precipitators , 2000 .

[9]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Particulate air pollution and daily mortality in Detroit. , 1991, Environmental research.

[10]  C. Pope,et al.  Particulate air pollution and daily mortality on Utah's Wasatch Front. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  K. Siegmann,et al.  Soot formation in flames , 2000 .

[12]  Barbara Zielinska,et al.  Characterizing PM2.5 emission profiles for stationary sources: comparison of traditional and dilution sampling techniques , 2000 .

[13]  Ralf Zimmermann,et al.  Particle collection efficiency and particle re-entrainment of an electrostatic precipitator in a sewage sludge incineration plant. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Chang-Yu Wu,et al.  Combustion Aerosols: Factors Governing Their Size and Composition and Implications to Human Health , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.