Effects of firm size and geographical proximity on different models of interaction between university and firm: A case study

Abstract This paper analyzes a total of 1930 collaboration projects, including contract research, joint research, technology transfer, and incubation models, between National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) and firms during the period between 2001 and 2009. Effects of both firm size and geographical proximity on the frequency of different models of collaboration are addressed. Results show that large-sized enterprises prefer adopting the contract research model and implementing it in a more comprehensive cooperation mechanism or with long-term cooperation relationships. By contrast, small and medium-sized enterprises prefer to give equal prominence to both contract research for research subject dominance and joint research due to low investment requirements. Results also show that geographical proximity is an important factor during the interaction between enterprises and NCKU. However, the influence is quite different when the cooperation models are compared individually.

[1]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[2]  R. Pouder,et al.  Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation , 1996 .

[3]  Heng Liu,et al.  Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Contractual Manufacturing Model , 2008 .

[4]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations , 2003, Scientometrics.

[5]  John T. Scott,et al.  U.S. science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities , 2003 .

[6]  中華經濟研究院.  White paper on small and medium enterprises in Taiwan , 1998 .

[7]  Dimitris Skuras,et al.  Innovation and Peripherality: An Empirical Comparative Study of SMEs in Six European Union Member Countries , 2008 .

[8]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[9]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Geography Matter for Science-Based Firms? Epistemic Communities and the Geography of Research and Patenting in Biotechnology , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Hans Löfsten,et al.  Proximity as a Resource Base for Competitive Advantage: University–Industry Links for Technology Transfer , 2004 .

[11]  Leonard Solomon Silk,et al.  Communicating Economic Ideas and Controversies , 1986 .

[12]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Global Competitiveness Report 2007-2008 , 2007 .

[13]  Alessandro Sterlacchini,et al.  Innovation, formal vs. informal R&D, and firm size: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing firms , 1990 .

[14]  David L. Deeds,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN HIGH TECHNOLOGY VENTURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY FIRMS , 2000 .

[15]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria , 2003 .

[16]  Petr Hanel,et al.  Industry–University Collaboration by Canadian Manufacturing Firms* , 2006 .

[17]  D. Mowery,et al.  The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University–Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments? , 2004 .

[18]  Attila Varga,et al.  Geographical Spillovers and University Research: A Spatial EconometricPerspective , 2000 .

[19]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[20]  Doris Schartinger,et al.  Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria , 2001 .

[21]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Rosina Moreno,et al.  Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions , 2003 .

[23]  Joaquín Guzmán,et al.  Firms as source of variety in innovation: influence of size and sector , 2011 .

[24]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[25]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Firm size and innovation , 1991 .

[26]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Universities and Innovation in Space , 2007 .

[27]  Albert N. Link,et al.  The economics of intellectual property at universities: an overview of the special issue , 2003 .

[28]  Patrick Waelbroeck,et al.  Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data , 2003 .

[29]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s , 1985 .

[30]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[31]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[32]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[33]  Xiang dong Chen,et al.  IT adoption in manufacturing industries: differences by company size and industrial sectors — the case of Chinese mechanical industries , 2001 .

[34]  Yoshio Takahashi,et al.  Factors mediating gender and firm performance in Lao micro, small, and medium sized enterprises , 2012 .

[35]  Elyse Golob,et al.  Capturing the Regional Economic Benefits of University Technology Transfer: A Case Study , 2006 .

[36]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[37]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Knowledge-Based Economy , 2006 .

[38]  M. Meeus,et al.  Do Organizational and Spatial Proximity Impact on Firm Performance? , 2005 .

[39]  K. Chang,et al.  University-government partnership in technology transfer: Taiwan's experience , 2012 .

[40]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Anders Broström,et al.  Working with Distant Researchers - Distance and Content in University-Industry Interaction , 2010 .

[42]  A. Broström,et al.  Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? , 2008 .

[43]  Dipti Pandya,et al.  How scientists commercialise new knowledge via entrepreneurship , 2008 .

[44]  Alessandro Muscio,et al.  What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy , 2010 .

[45]  E. Mansfield.  Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[46]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Interaction of Universities and Industrial Enterprises in Germany and the United States-A Comparison , 1999 .