Stability of Grazing Systems: An Application of Predator-Prey Graphs

In a now classical paper, Rosenzweig & MacArthur (1963) have shown how the general stability properties of simple predator-prey systems can be studied by graphical techniques, supplemented by mathematical analysis of the behaviour near equilibrium points. A similar, graphical analysis of predation functions was suggested by Holling (1965). The stability analysis of predator and prey isoclines in the predator-prey 'phase diagram' has been discussed further by MacArthur & Connell (1966) and Rosenzweig (1969, 1971). The mathematical and graphical analysis of stability in predator-prey systems, and even three-trophic-levels systems, have been extended by Canale (1970), Rosenzweig (1973), Hubbell (1973), May (1971, 1972), Vandermeer (1973), Strebel & Goel (1973) and Maynard Smith & Slatkin (1973). Thus a considerable body of theory has been developed to deal with systems of populations at two or more trophic levels, or 'exploitation' systems (Rosenzweig 1973). So far only few attempts (Salt 1967; Maly 1969; McAllister, Le Brasseur & Parsons 1972) have been made to apply this theory to real ecological systems, whether by directing experiments or observations to test it, or even by comparing its predictions with existing data. Partly this slowness in application may have been due to the feeling that these theoretical models are still too simplified to be expected to apply directly to the manyspecies, variable-environment and spatially heterogeneous predator-prey systems found in nature. However, as pointed out by Rosenzweig (1973), scientific theory often starts by testing rather simple models, even of complex systems. Grazing systems used and controlled by man, from intensive pastures to extensive range, may be considered as a special case of'predator-prey' systems. Much of the theory was developed with explicit or implicit reference to two animal populations (e.g. Rosenzweig & MacArthur 1963; Holling 1965). But herbivore ('predator')-plant ('prey') interaction is sufficiently similar in its general features to make the same approach useful. Some important modifications are necessary, on the basis of biological considerations, but some results are directly transferable between predator-prey and herbivore-plant systems. Grazing systems have some advantages as relatively simple test cases for general ecological theories: the number of species is limited (usually only one herbivore, in some cases one or a few plant species), environmental heterogeneity within a system is often low and movement of animals is controlled. There is a large and increasing number of observations and experiments on pasture and range systems in many parts of the world. On the other hand, grazing systems are one of the types of ecosystems which are of greatest importance to man; if theoretical ecology could contribute to their understanding and to the solution of their practical management problems, this would be a very useful contribution indeed.

[1]  I. Noy-Meir,et al.  Rotational grazing in a continuously growing pasture: A simple model , 1976 .

[2]  M. Austin,et al.  Ecosystem stability: a result from an abstract simulation. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[4]  J. Vandermeer Generalized Models of Two Species Interactions: A Graphical Analysis , 1973 .

[5]  D. Strebel,et al.  On the isocline methods for analyzing prey-predator interactions. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  H. M. Tsuchiya,et al.  Predator-prey interactions between Malthusian populations. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Exploitation in Three Trophic Levels , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[8]  J. Maynard Smith,et al.  The Stability of Predator‐Prey Systems , 1973 .

[9]  S. Hubbell Populations and Simple Food Webs as Energy Filters. II. Two-Species Systems , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[10]  M E Gilpin,et al.  Enriched predator-prey systems: theoretical stability. , 1972, Science.

[11]  Robert M. May,et al.  Limit Cycles in Predator-Prey Communities , 1972, Science.

[12]  M. Rosenzweig Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[13]  R. P. Canale An analysis of models describing predator‐prey interaction , 1970 .

[14]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Why the Prey Curve Has a Hump , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[15]  W. J. Ridgman,et al.  The design and interpretation of experiments to study animal production from grazed pasture , 1968, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[16]  R. Perry Australia's arid rangelands , 1968 .

[17]  G. Salt,et al.  Predation in an Experimental Protozoan Population (Woodruffia-Paramecium) , 1967 .

[18]  C. S. Holling The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density , 1966 .

[19]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Graphical Representation and Stability Conditions of Predator-Prey Interactions , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[20]  V. S. Ivlev,et al.  Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes , 1962 .

[21]  H. Heady Continuous vs. Specialized Grazing Systems: A Review and Application to the California Annual Type. , 1961 .

[22]  H. Paulsen,et al.  Trends in Carrying Capacity and Vegetation on an Arid Southwestern Range. , 1961 .

[23]  L. A. Stoddart,et al.  Determining Correct Stocking Rate on Range Land. , 1960 .

[24]  J. Harlan Generalized Curves for Gain Per Head and Gain Per Acre in Rates of Grazing Studies. , 1958 .

[25]  L. D. Incoll Prediction and measurement of photosynthetic productivity , 1972 .

[26]  N. Shaw The choice of stocking rate treatments as influenced by the expression of stocking rate. , 1970 .

[27]  F.W.T. Penning de Vries,et al.  The simulation of photosynthetic systems , 1970 .

[28]  E. J. Maly A Laboratory Study of the Interaction Between the Predatory Rotifer Asplanchna and Paramecium , 1969 .

[29]  F. Morley The biology of grazing management. , 1966 .

[30]  Morley Fhw Stability and productivity of pastures , 1966 .

[31]  C. S. Holling,et al.  The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. , 1965 .

[32]  R. G. Petersen,et al.  Relationship Between Rate of Stocking and Per Animal and Per Acre Performance on Pasture1 , 1965 .

[33]  G. O. Mott Grazing pressure and the measurement of pasture production. , 1960 .

[34]  W. Willoughby Limitations to animal production imposed by seasonal fluctuations in pasture and by management procedures. , 1959 .

[35]  C. Donald,et al.  The growth of swards of subterranean clover with particular reference to leaf area , 1958 .

[36]  R. W. Brougham A study in rate of pasture growth , 1955 .