Macroscale surface roughness and frictional resistance in overland flow

The hydraulics of overland flow on rough granular surfaces can be modelled and evaluated using the inundation ratio rather than the flow Reynolds number, as the primary dimensionless group determining the flow behaviour. The inundation ratio describes the average degree of submergence of the surface roughness and is used to distinguish three flow regimes representing partially inundated, marginally inundated and well-inundated surfaces. A heuristic physical model for the flow hydraulics in each regime demonstrates that the three states of flow are characterized by very different functional dependencies of frictional resistance on the scaled depth of flow. At partial inundation, flow resistance is associated with the drag force derived from individual roughness and therefore increases with depth and percentage cover. At marginal inundation, the size of the roughness elements relative to the depth of flow controls the degree of vertical mixing in the flow so that frictional resistance tends to decrease very rapidly with increasing depth of flow. Well-inundated flows are described using rough turbulent flow hydraulics previously developed for open channel flows. These flows exhibit a much more gradual decrease in frictional resistance with increasing depth than that observed during marginal inundation. A data set compiled from previously published studies of overland flow hydraulics is used to assess the functional dependence of frictional resistance on inundation ratio over a wide range of flow conditions. The data confirm the non-monotonic dependence predicted by the model and support the differentiation of three flow regimes based on the inundation ratio. Although the percentage cover and the surface slope may be of importance in addition to the inundation ratio in the partially and marginally inundated regimes, the Reynolds number appears to be of significance only in describing well-inundated flows at low to moderate Reynolds numbers. As these latter conditions are quite rare in natural environments, the inundation ratio rather than the Reynolds number should be used as the primary dimensionless group when evaluating the hydraulics of overland flow on rough surfaces. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  T. Dunne,et al.  Effects of Rainfall, Vegetation, and Microtopography on Infiltration and Runoff , 1991 .

[2]  J. Savat.  Resistance to flow in rough supercritical sheet flow , 1980 .

[3]  J. Gilley,et al.  Darcy-Weisbach Roughness Coefficients for Surfaces with Residue and Gravel Cover , 1995 .

[4]  A. D. Abrahams.  Discussion: ‘Macroscale surface roughness and frictional resistance in overland flow’ by D. S. L. Lawrence , 1998 .

[5]  D. Dunkerley.  Surface stone cover on desert hillslopes; parameterizing characteristics relevant to infiltration and surface runoff , 1995 .

[6]  J. Poesen,et al.  Effects of rock fragment size and cover on overland flow hydraulics, local turbulence and sediment yield on an erodible soil surface , 1994 .

[7]  P. Wilcock,et al.  Experimental study of incipient motion in mixed‐size sediment , 1988 .

[8]  John Wainwright,et al.  Resistance to overland flow on semiarid grassland and shrubland hillslopes, Walnut Gulch, southern Arizona , 1994 .

[9]  J. Motha,et al.  Modelling overland flow with seepage , 1995 .

[10]  A. Parsons,et al.  Resistance to overland flow on desert hillslopes , 1986 .

[11]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  Determining the mean depth of overland flow in field studies of flow hydraulics , 1990 .

[12]  J. Bridge,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE ENTRAINMENT AND TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT GRAINS OF MIXED SIZES, SHAPES, AND DENSITIES , 1992 .

[13]  J. Savat.  The hydraulics of sheet flow on a smooth surface and the effect of simulated rainfall , 1977 .

[14]  F. J. Watts,et al.  Effects of Surface Roughness and Rainfall Impact on Overland Flow , 1995 .

[15]  J. Roels.  Flow resistance in concentrated overland flow on rough slope surfaces , 1984 .

[16]  Richard D. Hey,et al.  Gravel-Bed Rivers: Fluvial Processes, Engineering and Management , 1982 .

[17]  G. Rauws,et al.  Laboratory experiments on resistance to overland flow due to composite roughness , 1988 .

[18]  J. Poesen,et al.  Effects of rock fragment covers on erosion and transport of noncohesive sediment by shallow overland-flow , 1993 .

[19]  Leonard J. Lane,et al.  Hydraulic Roughness Coefficients for Native Rangelands , 1992 .

[20]  R. Rudra,et al.  Hydraulics of sediment‐laden sheetflow and the influence of simulated rainfall , 1990 .

[21]  John E. Gilley,et al.  Darcy-Weisbach Roughness Coefficients for Gravel and Cobble Surfaces , 1992 .

[22]  A. Parsons,et al.  Hydraulics of interrill overland flow on stone-covered desert surfaces , 1994 .

[23]  John E. Gilley,et al.  Roughness Coefficients for Selected Residue Materials , 1991 .

[24]  H. Langhaar.  Dimensional analysis and theory of models , 1951 .

[25]  Martin C. Miller,et al.  Threshold of sediment motion under unidirectional currents , 1977 .

[26]  A. Parsons,et al.  Resistance to Overland Flow on Desert Pavement and Its Implications for Sediment Transport Modeling , 1991 .

[27]  P. Komar,et al.  Measurements and analysis of setting velocities of natural quartz sand grains , 1981 .

[28]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  Hydraulics of interrill overland flow on a semi-arid hillslope, southern Arizona , 1990 .