Design factors influencing performance of constrained acetabular liners: finite element characterization.

Constrained acetabular liners are utilized to deal with the infrequent but devastating problem of recurrent dislocation. While an encouraging treatment of last resort, the clinical performance of contemporary constrained liners has been somewhat mixed. There are multiple factors contributing to this variability, one of which is the limited understanding of the intrinsic mechanical characteristics of these specialty devices. To address this issue, a three-dimensional, materially nonlinear, multi-surface contact finite element model of a representative constrained liner was created. The model was physically validated, and then used for parametric testing to explore the effects of individual design features. The model was exercised for both intra-operative assembly and lever-out dislocation. It was found that the coefficient of friction between the femoral head and the liner substantially affected both the force required to seat the femoral head into the liner during assembly, and the peak moment resisting dislocation (226% increase in assembly force for friction coefficients of 0.2 versus 0.0; 49% reduction in dislocation moment for friction coefficients of 0.013 versus 0.135). As expected, the cup opening radius also had a dominant effect on both maneuvers: decreasing the opening radius from 13.9 to 13.6 mm increased assembly force by 506 N and increased the dislocation moment by over 3.5 N-m, whereas the influence of other design parameters was much more modest.

[1]  Roy D. Crowninshield,et al.  The influences of lubricant and material on polymer/CoCr sliding friction , 2003 .

[2]  D. Pedersen,et al.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a single surgeon's experience. , 2001, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[3]  D R Laster,et al.  Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  P. Lachiewicz,et al.  Stability of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 75 Years or Older , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  W. Dust,et al.  Failure of a new constrained acetabular insert: a report of 2 cases. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  S. Banks,et al.  Closed Reduction of Constrained Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  W. Bruce,et al.  Salvaging Unstable or Recurrent Dislocating Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Constrained Acetabular Component , 2002, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.

[8]  P. Pellicci,et al.  The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  John J Callaghan,et al.  Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  H. Skinner,et al.  Constrained acetabular components. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  P. Bonutti,et al.  Effects of machining on tribological behavior of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) under dry reciprocating sliding , 1999 .

[12]  T. Matsuno,et al.  Destruction of acetabular bone caused by early failure of a constrained acetabular component. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  M. A. Ali Khan,et al.  Dislocation following total hip replacement. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  B. K. Vaughn,et al.  Preliminary report on the S-ROM constraining acetabular insert: a retrospective clinical experience. , 1991, Orthopedics.

[15]  T D Brown,et al.  A Finite Element Analysis of Factors Influencing Total Hip Dislocation , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.