Digital Government: overcoming the systemic failure of transformation

By disseminating this working paper on an open access platform, the authors hope to entice wider discussion among the research and practitioner communities engaged in public sector and digital government research about the ideas and propositions presented. Parts of the working paper will be converted into a journal publication and later extended into a book.

[1]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  An analysis of methodologies utilised in e-government research: A user satisfaction perspective , 2012, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[2]  M. Howlett,et al.  Tales From the Crypt , 2013 .

[3]  Charles W. Anderson.  Statecraft: An introduction to political choice and judgment , 1977 .

[4]  Studying E-Government: Research Methodologies, Data Compilation Techniques and Future Outlook , 2012 .

[5]  Habin Lee,et al.  UK e-government provider satisfaction evaluation:findings from the I-MEET study , 2014 .

[6]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  The University of Bradford Institutional Repository , 2022 .

[8]  Athman Bouguettaya,et al.  Ubiquitous Web Services for E-Government Social Services , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: Semantic Web Meets eGovernment.

[9]  C. Hood,et al.  Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades , 2007 .

[10]  Frank Bannister,et al.  E-government Stage Models: A Contextual Critique , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Jeffrey W. Seifert,et al.  Using E-Government to Reinforce Government—Citizen Relationships , 2009 .

[12]  Matthias Finger,et al.  More than Digitisation - The Transformative Potential of E-Governance: An Exploratory Case Study , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  A. Schneider,et al.  Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools , 1990, The Journal of Politics.

[14]  M. Barzelay.  The New Public Management , 2019 .

[15]  Ramzi El-Haddadeh,et al.  The complexities of electronic services implementation and institutionalisation in the public sector , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The great theory hunt: Does e-government really have a problem? , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  Anthony B. Aktinson.  Inequality - what can be done? , 2016 .

[18]  C. Hood.  The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[19]  L. Salamon,et al.  The tools of government : a guide to the new governance , 2002 .

[20]  Michael Howlett,et al.  From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance , 2014 .

[21]  Rose O'Neill,et al.  The Transformative Impact of E-Government on Public Governance in New Zealand , 2009 .

[22]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Dismantling the silos: extracting new value from IT investments in public administration , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[23]  Zahir Irani,et al.  E-government implementation: A bird’s eye view of issues relating to costs, opportunities, benefits and risks , 2013, Information Systems Frontiers.

[24]  Tony Cornford,et al.  The State and Democracy After New Public Management: Exploring Alternative Models of E-Governance , 2012, Inf. Soc..

[25]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  An investigation of national policies on transformational government (t-Gov) in Europe , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag..

[26]  Zahir Irani,et al.  A Review of the Factors Affecting User Satisfaction in Electronic Government Services , 2014, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[27]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  SQ mGov: A Comprehensive Service-Quality Paradigm for Mobile Government , 2014, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[28]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities for Information Sharing: XBRL Enabling Business-to-Government Information Exchange , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agenda , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  V. Weerakkody,et al.  Adoption and diffusion of free wireless internet parks in Qatar , 2010 .

[31]  H. William Vroman,et al.  Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector , 1994 .

[32]  G. Orwell.  Politics and the English Language , 2018, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[33]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Beyond Good and Evil in Policy Implementation: Instrument Mixes, Implementation Styles, and Second Generation Theories of Policy Instrument Choice , 2004 .

[34]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government information sharing and integration: Combining the social and the technical , 2009, Inf. Polity.

[35]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Forward to the past: Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[36]  Jungwoo Lee.  Search for stage theory in e-government development , 2007 .

[37]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Determinants of Service Quality and Continuance Intention of Online Services: The Case of eTax , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  Pierre Lascoumes,et al.  Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation , 2007 .

[39]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Cuing Consumerism , 2012, Psychology Science.

[40]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government discourses: An inductive analysis , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[41]  E. Morozov,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here , 2013 .

[42]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design , 2009 .

[43]  Mirko Vintar,et al.  E-government and organisational transformation of government: Black box revisited? , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  The Myths of E-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[45]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Evaluating and modelling constructs for e-government decision making , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[46]  L. Wittgenstein.  Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus , 2021, Nordic Wittgenstein Review.

[48]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology integration solutions in UK local government: An exploratory study , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[50]  P. Beynon-Davies,et al.  Electronic Local Government and the Modernisation Agenda: Progress and Prospects for Public Service Improvement , 2004 .

[51]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  Big questions of e-government research , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[52]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to-government systems usage in the Netherlands , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[53]  Jane E. Fountain,et al.  Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service , 2001 .

[54]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Lessons on Measuring e-Government Satisfaction: An Experience from Surveying Government Agencies in the UK , 2014, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[55]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[56]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons , 2007 .

[58]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[59]  Yuan Long,et al.  Synthesizing e-government stage models - a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[60]  Evgeny V. Morozov,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems that Don't Exist by E. Morozov, ed., , 2013, Inf. Polity.

[61]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[62]  赫尓徳,et al.  民主的模式 = Models of democracy , 1986 .

[63]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Realizing joined-up government - Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[64]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Managerial discretion and internal alignment under regulatory constraints and change , 2007 .

[65]  Frank Bannister,et al.  ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[66]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts , 1989, Journal of Public Policy.

[67]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[68]  Paul Waller,et al.  A Social Innovation Investment Appraisal Method and Tool , 2013 .

[69]  Hyun Joon Kim,et al.  The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[70]  C. Hood,et al.  The tools of government in the digital age , 2007 .