Research Transparency: A Preliminary Study of Disciplinary Conceptualisation, Drivers, Tools and Support Services

T his paper describes a preliminary study of research transparency, which draws on the findings from four focus group sessions with faculty in chemistry, law, urban and social studies, and civil and environmental engineering. The multi-faceted nature of transparency is highlighted by the broad ways in which the faculty conceptualised the concept (data sharing, ethics, replicability) and the vocabulary they used with common core terms identified (data, methods, full disclosure). The associated concepts of reproducibility and trust are noted. The research lifecycle stages are used as a foundation to identify the action verbs and software tools associated with transparency. A range of transparency drivers and motivations are listed. The role of libraries and data scientists is discussed in the context of the provision of transparency services for researchers .

[1]  John Wilbanks,et al.  First, design for data sharing , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research , 2014, Science.

[3]  Eleanor Mattern,et al.  Developing Design Interventions for Cyberbullying: A Narrative-Based Participatory Approach. , 2014 .

[4]  D. Moher,et al.  Declaration of transparency for each research article , 2013, BMJ.

[5]  A. Nekrutenko,et al.  Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences , 2010, Genome Biology.

[6]  Marcel Salathé,et al.  Ethical Challenges of Big Data in Public Health , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Susann Fiedler,et al.  Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency , 2016, PLoS biology.

[8]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  Clarifying the terminology that describes scientific reproducibility , 2015, Nature Methods.

[9]  A J Carlson,et al.  Frederick R. Rickles, MD, FACP, Appointed Executive Director of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology , 2004, Journal of Investigative Medicine.

[10]  Daqing He,et al.  Using participatory design and visual narrative inquiry to investigate researchers' data challenges and recommendations for library research data services , 2015, Program.

[11]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Research integrity: Don't let transparency damage science , 2016, Nature.

[12]  Dirk Pilat,et al.  OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding , 2007, Data Sci. J..

[13]  M. S. Avila-Garcia,et al.  From Peer-Reviewed to Peer-Reproduced in Scholarly Publishing: The Complementary Roles of Data Models and Workflows in Bioinformatics , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  Making Open Science a Reality , 2015 .

[15]  Virginia Gewin,et al.  Data sharing: An open mind on open data , 2016, Nature.

[16]  M. Baker.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.

[17]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Promoting an open research culture , 2015, Science.

[18]  Ruth E. Duerr,et al.  Data Stewardship in the Earth Sciences , 2015, D Lib Mag..

[19]  Elizabeth Gilbert,et al.  Reproducibility Project: Results (Part of symposium called "The Reproducibility Project: Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science") , 2014 .

[20]  Jonathan M. Borwein,et al.  Setting the Default to Reproducible Reproducibility in Computational and Experimental Mathematics , 2013 .

[21]  A. Moravcsik.  Transparency: The Revolution in Qualitative Research , 2013, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[22]  Elizabeth R. Peterson,et al.  How to Get Focus Groups Talking: New Ideas that will Stick , 2007 .

[23]  D. Sarewitz.  Reproducibility will not cure what ails science , 2015, Nature.

[24]  Renata Gonçalves Curty,et al.  Untangling data sharing and reuse in social sciences , 2016, ASIST.

[25]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  A Practical Guide for Improving Transparency and Reproducibility in Neuroimaging Research , 2016, bioRxiv.

[26]  Liz Lyon,et al.  Transparency: the emerging third dimension of Open Science and Open Data , 2016 .

[27]  Adrian Burton,et al.  Designing for Discovery and Re-Use: the 'ANDS Data Sharing Verbs' Approach to Service Decomposition , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[28]  Daqing He,et al.  Investigating perceptions and support for transparency and openness in research: Using card sorting in a pilot study with academic librarians , 2016, ASIST.

[29]  Amitai Etzioni.  Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant , 2016 .