Comparison of Urine Cytology Between the Ileal Conduit and Indiana Pouch

OBJECTIVE To compare the cytomorphologic features of urine obtained from two different kinds of urinary diversions constructed after total bladder resection. STUDY DESIGN The smears of urine from 11 ileal conduits and 6 Indiana pouches were evaluated. All patients underwent total bladder resection due to transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) or other kinds of cancer before urine diversion. RESULTS The cytologic features of Indiana pouch urine include degenerated, small, round cells without columnar cells derived from intestinal epithelium. In ileal conduit urine, well-preserved columnar cells and degenerated, small, round cells were frequently observed. The columnar cells in ileal conduit urine exhibited cytologic features that should be distinguished from TCC cells. CONCLUSION The method of reconstructing the urinary tract is important in urine cytology from urine diversions because the cytomorphologic features of urine are different between the two kinds of urinary diversions. Since columnar cells in ileal conduit urine might lead to misdiagnosis as TCC, special consideration is required to examine ileal conduit urine.

[1]  A. Shokeir,et al.  Late malignancy in bowel segments exposed to urine without fecal stream. , 1995, Urology.

[2]  M. Likourinas,et al.  Urine cytology evaluation in cases of uretero‐ileal cutaneous diversion , 1995, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[3]  R. Kahnoski,et al.  The Indiana Continent Urinary Reservoir , 1987 .

[4]  A. Ketcham,et al.  Cytology of ileal conduit urine. , 1971, Acta cytologica.

[5]  J.Edward Hall,et al.  Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic Bases , 1962 .

[6]  E. Bricker Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. , 1950, The Surgical clinics of North America.