B-CELL LYMPHOMA LINE (RAJI) VIABILITY AND SURFACE MARKER EXPRESSION MINIMALLY AFFECTED BY 20- AND 25-GAUGE VITRECTOMY SYSTEMS ANALYZED BY FLOW CYTOMETRY

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 20-gauge (20-G) and 25-gauge (25-G) vitrectomy on cell viability and diagnostic yield (surface marker expression) using flow cytometry and human lymphoma cells in culture. Methods: Cultured human Burkitt lymphoma cells (Raji B-cell lymphoma line) were allocated into five study groups in Roswell Park Memorial Institute media. By using manual aspiration, cells were then processed by aspiration alone, by 20-G vitrectomy at 600 cuts per minute (cpm) and 1,500 cpm, or by 25-G vitrectomy at both 600 and 1,500 cpm. To assess cell viability and cell surface marker expression, samples underwent standard flow cytometry analysis for suspected lymphoma using 7-amino-actinomycin D and antibodies against CD45, CD19, lambda, and kappa light chains. Results: Twenty-five samples were processed after being divided into four vitrectomy groups and one nonvitrectomy group (control). The mean cell viability was 98.5 for both the nonvitrectomized and vitrectomized specimens. The percentage of cells positive for CD45 or kappa light chain was the same in the nonvitrectomized and vitrectomized groups. In addition, the level of expression of these molecules was not significantly different in all five groups. Similarly, no difference was seen for these markers between 20-G and 25-G vitrectomy at either a cut rate of 600 or 1,500 cpm. The percentage positive for CD19 was significantly lower for the 20-G vitrectomy at 1,500 cpm compared with the 25-G vitrectomy at both 600 and 1,500 cpm. Percentage of CD19 cells was greater for the 25-G vitrectomy at 600 cpm than the nonvitrectomy group. Conclusion: Compared with simple aspiration, both 20-G and 25-G vitrectomy seem to have no significant effect on cell viability or diagnostic yield for B-cell lymphoma cells (Raji cell line) in suspension based on flow cytometry. Further studies need to be conducted to study and compare 20-G versus 25-G vitrectomy on lymphoma cells in human vitreous or in an animal model.

[1]  D. Maberley,et al.  Contribution of vitreous cytology to final clinical diagnosis fifteen-year review of vitreous cytology specimens from one institution. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[2]  R. Margolis Diagnostic vitrectomy for the diagnosis and management of posterior uveitis of unknown etiology , 2008, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[3]  A. Dick,et al.  Cytopathological analysis of vitreous in intraocular lymphoma , 2008, Eye.

[4]  A. Paetau,et al.  Primary intraocular lymphoma: improving the diagnostic procedure. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[5]  Chi-Chao Chan,et al.  Biopsy techniques and yields in diagnosing primary intraocular lymphoma , 2007, International Ophthalmology.

[6]  R. Curi,et al.  Comparative toxicity of oleic acid and linoleic acid on Raji cells. , 2005, Nutrition.

[7]  Chi-Chao Chan,et al.  Intraocular lymphoma: update on diagnosis and management. , 2004, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[8]  H. Grossniklaus,et al.  Primary intraocular lymphoma: clinical, cytologic, and flow cytometric analysis. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[9]  M. Ehrlichová,et al.  Iron deprivation induces apoptosis independently of p53 in human and murine tumour cells , 2003, Cell proliferation.

[10]  C. Drevon,et al.  Necrosis and apoptosis in lymphoma cell lines exposed to eicosapentaenoic acid and antioxidants , 2001, Lipids.

[11]  C. Chan,et al.  Molecular analysis of primary central nervous system and primary intraocular lymphomas. , 2001, Current molecular medicine.

[12]  H. Bartsch,et al.  A comparison of gamma and neutron irradiation on Raji cells: effects on DNA damage, repair, cell cycle distribution and lethality. , 1999, Mutation research.

[13]  W. Paulus Classification, Pathogenesis and Molecular Pathology of Primary CNS Lymphomas , 1999, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[14]  P. Ruiz,et al.  Diagnosis of intraocular lymphoma by flow cytometry. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  B W Corn,et al.  Will primary central nervous system lymphoma be the most frequent brain tumor diagnosed in the year 2000? , 1997, Cancer.

[16]  R. Nussenblatt,et al.  Intraocular lymphoma. Clinical and histopathologic diagnosis. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[17]  J. Gonder,et al.  Effect of vitrectomy and cytopreparatory techniques on cell survival and preservation. , 1992, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[18]  L. Deangelis,et al.  Combined modality therapy for primary CNS lymphoma. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  P. Burger,et al.  Increasing incidence of primary brain lymphoma in the US , 1988, Cancer.

[20]  W. Green,et al.  Clinical features, laboratory investigations, and survival in ocular reticulum cell sarcoma. , 1987, Ophthalmology.

[21]  J W Simon,et al.  Ocular reticulum cell sarcoma. , 1980, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  R. Appen Posterior uveitis and primary cerebral reticulum cell sarcoma. , 1975, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  E. Blumenthal,et al.  Intraocular lymphoma. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[24]  A. Rothova,et al.  Diagnostic testing of vitrectomy specimens. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.