Submaximal arm crank ergometry: Effects of crank axis positioning on mechanical efficiency, physiological strain and perceived discomfort

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the spatial orientation of the crank axis on mechanical efficiency, physiological strain and perceived discomfort in submaximal synchronous arm crank ergometry. Methods: Twelve able-bodied individuals performed 12 submaximal exercise bouts of 3 minutes (women: 20 W/25 W; men: 25 W/35 W). The crank axis position was defined by elbow and shoulder angle. Results: The results showed that a crank set-up with an elbow angle of 30° was more efficient than 15°; oxygen consumption and minute ventilation were significantly lower. No significant effects were seen for shoulder angle. Power output and gender showed obvious effects. Discussion and conclusion: The magnitude of this effect and the absence of any significant shoulder angle effects may be due to the relative low exertion levels that were evaluated. An elbow angle of 30° flexion in arm crank exercise is favourable compared to an elbow angle of 15° in able-bodied untrained subjects.

[1]  Han Houdijk,et al.  Influence of hand cycling on physical capacity in the rehabilitation of persons with a spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  P. Ludewig,et al.  Clinical Trial of Exercise for Shoulder Pain in Chronic Spinal Injury , 2006, Physical Therapy.

[3]  A. Hicks,et al.  Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[4]  L. Gladden,et al.  Responses to submaximal and maximal arm cycling above, at, and below heart level. , 1983, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  A physiological comparison of synchronous and asynchronous hand cycling. , 2004, International journal of sports medicine.

[6]  Jacquelin Perry,et al.  Effect of Fore-Aft Seat Position on Shoulder Demands During Wheelchair Propulsion:Part2. An Electromyographic Analysis , 2005, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[7]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Submaximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling versus handrim wheelchair propulsion , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[8]  James H Rimmer,et al.  Health Promotion for People with Physical, Cognitive, and Sensory Disabilities: An Emerging National Priority , 2002, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[9]  H E Veeger,et al.  Biomechanics and physiology in active manual wheelchair propulsion. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  M. Nash,et al.  Effects of circuit resistance training on fitness attributes and upper-extremity pain in middle-aged men with paraplegia. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  R A Cooper,et al.  Methods for determining three-dimensional wheelchair pushrim forces and moments: a technical note. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  C. Warfield,et al.  The measurement of pain. , 1988, Hospital practice.

[13]  E. Heath.  Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales , 1998 .

[14]  G Mukherjee,et al.  Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  R H Rozendal,et al.  Seat height in handrim wheelchair propulsion. , 1989, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  Alicia M Koontz,et al.  Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities, wheelchair propulsion, and gender. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  H E Veeger,et al.  Manual wheelchair propulsion: effects of power output on physiology and technique. , 1988, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  Maria T. E. Hopman,et al.  Physiological responses to asynchronous and synchronous arm-cranking exercise , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[19]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Biophysical aspects of submaximal hand cycling. , 2008, International journal of sports medicine.

[20]  Helena Saraste,et al.  Shoulder pain in persons with thoracic spinal cord injury: prevalence and characteristics. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[21]  L Garby,et al.  The relationship between the respiratory quotient and the energy equivalent of oxygen during simultaneous glucose and lipid oxidation and lipogenesis. , 1987, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[22]  H E Veeger,et al.  Handcycling: different modes and gear ratios. , 2000, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[23]  E N Corlett,et al.  A technique for assessing postural discomfort. , 1976, Ergonomics.

[24]  T. K. Hight,et al.  Effects of crank length and seat position on arm cranked ergometry performance , 1988, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[25]  G Salvendy,et al.  Psychophysiological aspects of paced and unpaced performance as influenced by age. , 1971, Ergonomics.

[26]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Power output and metabolic cost of synchronous and asynchronous submaximal and peak level hand cycling on a motor driven treadmill in able-bodied male subjects. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[27]  S. Delp,et al.  Variation of muscle moment arms with elbow and forearm position. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  K. An,et al.  Optimum length of muscle contraction. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[29]  M. Nash,et al.  The relationship between perceived exertion and physiologic indicators of stress during graded arm exercise in persons with spinal cord injuries. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  Paul Sindall,et al.  The effects of arm crank strategy on physiological responses and mechanical efficiency during submaximal exercise , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[31]  K. Nordeen-Snyder,et al.  The effect of bicycle seat height variation upon oxygen consumption and lower limb kinematics. , 1977, Medicine and science in sports.

[32]  S. Delp,et al.  The isometric functional capacity of muscles that cross the elbow. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  J. Romkes,et al.  Mechanical efficiency in arm cranking exercise , 1999 .

[34]  L. A. Rozendaal,et al.  Load on the shoulder in low intensity wheelchair propulsion. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[35]  A. Schrijvers,et al.  Services for spinal cord injured: availability and satisfaction , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[36]  Lucas van der Woude,et al.  Biomedical aspects of manual wheelchair propulsion : the state of the art II , 1999 .

[37]  W L Haskell,et al.  J.B. Wolffe Memorial Lecture. Health consequences of physical activity: understanding and challenges regarding dose-response. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[38]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Mechanical load on the upper extremity during wheelchair activities. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.