On adaptive underwater object detection

A new algorithm for the detection of underwater objects in sonar imagery is proposed. One particularly novel component of the algorithm also detects the presence of, and estimates the orientation of, sand ripples. The overall algorithm is made extremely fast by employing a cascaded architecture and by exploiting integral-image representations. As a result, the method makes real-time detection of objects in streaming sonar data collected by an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) feasible. No training data is required because the proposed method is adaptively tailored to the environmental characteristics of the sensed data that is collected in situ. The flexible yet rigorous approach also addresses and overcomes five major limitations that plague the most popular detection algorithms that are in common use. Moreover, the proposed algorithm achieves superior performance across a variety of seabed types on a large, challenging data set of real sonar data collected at sea. Ways to exploit the findings and adapt AUV surveys for optimized detection performance are also suggested.

[1]  Hanumant Singh,et al.  Imaging Underwater for Archaeology , 2000 .

[2]  Torstein O. Sæbø,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF SHALLOW WATER PERFORMANCE USING INTERFEROMETRIC SONAR COHERENCE , 2009 .

[3]  Z. Reut,et al.  Computer classification of sea beds by sonar , 1985, Nature.

[4]  David P. Williams,et al.  DETECTION RATE STATISTICS IN SYNTHETIC APERTURE SONAR IMAGES , 2009 .

[6]  Michael J. Barnes,et al.  Modeling the effects of crew size and crew fatigue on the control of tactical unmanned aerial vehicles (TUAVs) , 2000, 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37165).

[8]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[9]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Robust Real-time Object Detection , 2001 .

[10]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Detection of buried targets via active selection of labeled data: application to sensing subsurface UXO , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Scott Reed,et al.  An automatic approach to the detection and extraction of mine features in sidescan sonar , 2003 .

[12]  Gerhard Widmer,et al.  Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts , 2004, Machine Learning.

[13]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[14]  S. Douady,et al.  Formation and stability of transverse and longitudinal sand dunes , 2010 .

[15]  M. Amate,et al.  Mean–Standard Deviation Representation of Sonar Images for Echo Detection: Application to SAS Images , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[16]  Gerald J. Dobeck,et al.  Automated detection and classification of sea mines in sonar imagery , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[17]  A. Bellettini,et al.  Theoretical accuracy of synthetic aperture sonar micronavigation using a displaced phase-center antenna , 2002 .

[18]  Abdallah E. Dabbagh,et al.  Detection of sand-covered geologic features in the Arabian Peninsula using SIR-C/X-SAR data☆ , 1997 .

[19]  Shawn F. Johnson,et al.  Modeling the Effect of Seafloor Ripples on Synthetic Aperture Sonar Speckle Statistics , 2010, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[20]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[21]  Torstein Olsmo Sæbø,et al.  Challenges in Seafloor Imaging and Mapping With Synthetic Aperture Sonar , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Stefan B. Williams,et al.  Surveying noctural cuttlefish camouflage behaviour using an AUV , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[23]  Yvan Petillot,et al.  Real time AUV pipeline detection and tracking using side scan sonar and multi-beam echo-sounder , 2002, OCEANS '02 MTS/IEEE.

[24]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Robust Real-Time Face Detection , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.