Augmented, Pulsating Tactile Feedback Facilitates Simulator Training of Clinical Breast Examinations

Haptic training devices can facilitate tactile skill development by providing repeatable exposures to rare stimuli. Extant haptic training simulator research primarily emphasizes realistic stimuli representation; however, the experiments reported herein suggest that providing augmented feedback can improve training effectiveness, even when the feedback is not natural. A novel clinical breast examination training device uses inflated balloons embedded in silicone to simulate breast lumps. Oscillating the balloon water pressure makes the lumps pulsate. The pulsating lumps are easier to detect than the static lumps used in current simulators, and this manipulation seems to effectively introduce trainees to small, deep lumps that are initially difficult to perceive. A study of 48 medical students indicates that training with the dynamic breast model increased the number of lumps detected, F(1, 47) = 9.34, p = .004, decreased the number of false positives, F(1, 47) = 5.78, p = .020, and improved intersimulator skill transfer, F(1, 47) = 26.56, p < .001. The results suggest that at least in this case, augmented, tactile feedback increases training effectiveness, despite the fact that the feedback does not attempt to mimic any physical phenomenon present in the natural stimulus. Applications of this research include training techniques and tools for improved detection of palpable cancers.

[1]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[2]  George V. Popescu,et al.  Virtual reality-based training for the diagnosis of prostate cancer , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Physicians' abilities to detect lumps in silicone breast models. , 1985, JAMA.

[4]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  Roni Yagel,et al.  Building a virtual environment for endoscopic sinus surgery simulation , 1996, Comput. Graph..

[6]  C. K. Adams,et al.  Major stimulus dimensions determining detection of simulated breast lesions , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. , 1989 .

[8]  T M Morgan,et al.  Improving physicians' and nurses' clinical breast examination: a randomized controlled trial. , 1991, American journal of preventive medicine.

[9]  C. K. Adams,et al.  Improved detection of human breast lesions following experimental training , 1980, Cancer.

[10]  S Weghorst,et al.  Fast finite element modeling for surgical simulation. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[11]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  A Virtual Environment Testbed for Training Laparoscopic Surgical Skills , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  H. S. Pennypacker,et al.  Progress in manual breast examination , 1977, Cancer.

[14]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Improving realism of a surgery simulator: linear anisotropic elasticity, complex interactions and force extrapolation , 2002, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[15]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Analysis of 462 breast carcinomas. , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[16]  J K Heard,et al.  Clinical breast examination: an illustrated educational review and update. , 2001, Clinical excellence for nurse practitioners : the international journal of NPACE.

[17]  Carole Lannon,et al.  Improving clinical breast examination training in a medical school , 1993, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[18]  S. Bennett,et al.  Effectiveness of methods used to teach breast self-examination. , 1990, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  E A Coleman,et al.  Breast cancer screening for primary care trainees: comparison of two teaching methods. , 2001, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[20]  N C Dolan,et al.  Do clinical breast examination skills improve during medical school? , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[21]  M Zelen,et al.  Screening sensitivity and sojourn time from breast cancer early detection clinical trials: mammograms and physical examinations. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  J M Wiecha,et al.  Provider confidence in breast examination. , 1993, Family practice research journal.

[23]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2005 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[24]  Howard N. Zelaznik,et al.  Advances in Motor Learning and Control , 1996 .

[25]  Dong-Soo Kwon,et al.  Visually guided spine biopsy simulator with force feedback , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[26]  V. Clarke,et al.  Breast self-examination training: a brief review. , 1999, Cancer nursing.

[27]  H. S. Pennypacker,et al.  Toward an Effective Technology of Instruction in Breast Self-examination , 1982 .

[28]  Louis B. Rosenberg,et al.  A virtual simulation environment for learning epidural anesthesia. , 1996, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[29]  C. K. Adams,et al.  Lump detection in simulated human breasts , 1976 .

[30]  B E Storer,et al.  Assessing breast self-examination. , 1995, Preventive medicine.

[31]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .